Integrating Fine-Grained Audio-Visual Evidence for Robust Multimodal Emotion Reasoning
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.18321v2
- Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2026 05:48:10 GMT
- Title: Integrating Fine-Grained Audio-Visual Evidence for Robust Multimodal Emotion Reasoning
- Authors: Zhixian Zhao, Wenjie Tian, Lei Xie,
- Abstract summary: We introduce SABER-LLM, a framework designed for robust multimodal reasoning.<n>First, we construct SABER, a large-scale emotion reasoning dataset comprising 600K video clips.<n>Second, we propose the structured evidence decomposition paradigm, which enforces a "perceive-then-reason" separation between evidence extraction and reasoning.
- Score: 9.470507126417292
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Multimodal emotion analysis is shifting from static classification to generative reasoning. Beyond simple label prediction, robust affective reasoning must synthesize fine-grained signals such as facial micro-expressions and prosodic which shifts to decode the latent causality within complex social contexts. However, current Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) face significant limitations in fine-grained perception, primarily due to data scarcity and insufficient cross-modal fusion. As a result, these models often exhibit unimodal dominance which leads to hallucinations in complex multimodal interactions, particularly when visual and acoustic cues are subtle, ambiguous, or even contradictory (e.g., in sarcastic scenery). To address this, we introduce SABER-LLM, a framework designed for robust multimodal reasoning. First, we construct SABER, a large-scale emotion reasoning dataset comprising 600K video clips, annotated with a novel six-dimensional schema that jointly captures audiovisual cues and causal logic. Second, we propose the structured evidence decomposition paradigm, which enforces a "perceive-then-reason" separation between evidence extraction and reasoning to alleviate unimodal dominance. The ability to perceive complex scenes is further reinforced by consistency-aware direct preference optimization, which explicitly encourages alignment among modalities under ambiguous or conflicting perceptual conditions. Experiments on EMER, EmoBench-M, and SABER-Test demonstrate that SABER-LLM significantly outperforms open-source baselines and achieves robustness competitive with closed-source models in decoding complex emotional dynamics. The dataset and model are available at https://github.com/zxzhao0/SABER-LLM.
Related papers
- ADEPT: RL-Aligned Agentic Decoding of Emotion via Evidence Probing Tools -- From Consensus Learning to Ambiguity-Driven Emotion Reasoning [67.22219034602514]
We introduce ADEPT (Agentic Decoding of Emotion via Evidence Probing Tools), a framework that reframes emotion recognition as a multi-turn inquiry process.<n> ADEPT transforms an SLLM into an agent that maintains an evolving candidate emotion set and adaptively invokes dedicated semantic and acoustic probing tools.<n>We show that ADEPT improves primary emotion accuracy in most settings while substantially improving minor emotion characterization.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-13T08:33:37Z) - Analyzing Reasoning Consistency in Large Multimodal Models under Cross-Modal Conflicts [74.47786985522762]
We identify a critical failure mode termed textual inertia, where models tend to blindly adhere to the erroneous text while neglecting conflicting visual evidence.<n>We propose the LogicGraph Perturbation Protocol that structurally injects perturbations into the reasoning chains of diverse LMMs.<n>Results reveal that models successfully self-correct in less than 10% of cases and predominantly succumb to blind textual error propagation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-07T16:39:34Z) - Explaining multimodal LLMs via intra-modal token interactions [55.27436637894534]
Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have achieved remarkable success across diverse vision-language tasks, yet their internal decision-making mechanisms remain insufficiently understood.<n>We propose enhancing interpretability by leveraging intra-modal interaction.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-09-26T14:39:13Z) - Benchmarking and Bridging Emotion Conflicts for Multimodal Emotion Reasoning [21.344503400857107]
We introduce CA-MER, a new benchmark designed to examine MLLMs under realistic emotion conflicts.<n> evaluations reveal that current state-of-the-art emotion MLLMs systematically over-rely on audio signal during emotion conflicts.<n>We propose MoSEAR, a parameter-efficient framework that promotes balanced modality integration.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-08-02T04:03:44Z) - Multimodal Inconsistency Reasoning (MMIR): A New Benchmark for Multimodal Reasoning Models [26.17300490736624]
Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) are predominantly trained and tested on consistent visual-textual inputs.<n>We propose the Multimodal Inconsistency Reasoning benchmark to assess MLLMs' ability to detect and reason about semantic mismatches.<n>We evaluate six state-of-the-art MLLMs, showing that models with dedicated multimodal reasoning capabilities, such as o1, substantially outperform their counterparts.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-22T01:52:37Z) - Tracing Intricate Cues in Dialogue: Joint Graph Structure and Sentiment Dynamics for Multimodal Emotion Recognition [37.12407597998884]
A novel approach named GraphSmile is proposed for tracking intricate emotional cues in multimodal dialogues.<n>GraphSmile comprises two key components, i.e., GSF and SDP modules.<n> Empirical results on multiple benchmarks demonstrate that GraphSmile can handle complex emotional and sentimental patterns.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-31T11:47:36Z) - Cantor: Inspiring Multimodal Chain-of-Thought of MLLM [83.6663322930814]
We argue that converging visual context acquisition and logical reasoning is pivotal for tackling visual reasoning tasks.
We propose an innovative multimodal CoT framework, termed Cantor, characterized by a perception-decision architecture.
Our experiments demonstrate the efficacy of the proposed framework, showing significant improvements in multimodal CoT performance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-24T17:59:48Z) - Cross-Attention is Not Enough: Incongruity-Aware Dynamic Hierarchical
Fusion for Multimodal Affect Recognition [69.32305810128994]
Incongruity between modalities poses a challenge for multimodal fusion, especially in affect recognition.
We propose the Hierarchical Crossmodal Transformer with Dynamic Modality Gating (HCT-DMG), a lightweight incongruity-aware model.
HCT-DMG: 1) outperforms previous multimodal models with a reduced size of approximately 0.8M parameters; 2) recognizes hard samples where incongruity makes affect recognition difficult; 3) mitigates the incongruity at the latent level in crossmodal attention.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-23T01:24:15Z) - Fusion with Hierarchical Graphs for Mulitmodal Emotion Recognition [7.147235324895931]
This paper proposes a novel hierarchical graph network (HFGCN) model that learns more informative multimodal representations.
Specifically, the proposed model fuses multimodality inputs using a two-stage graph construction approach and encodes the modality dependencies into the conversation representation.
Experiments showed the effectiveness of our proposed model for more accurate AER, which yielded state-of-the-art results on two public datasets.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-09-15T08:21:01Z) - Bi-Bimodal Modality Fusion for Correlation-Controlled Multimodal
Sentiment Analysis [96.46952672172021]
Bi-Bimodal Fusion Network (BBFN) is a novel end-to-end network that performs fusion on pairwise modality representations.
Model takes two bimodal pairs as input due to known information imbalance among modalities.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-07-28T23:33:42Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.