Rethinking AI in the age of climate collapse: Ethics, power, and responsibility

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.18462v1
• Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2026 13:11:19 GMT
• Title: Rethinking AI in the age of climate collapse: Ethics, power, and responsibility
• Authors: Julio Vega,
• Abstract summary: This contribution examines the ambivalent role of AI in the ecological crisis, addressing both its promises and its risks.<n>On the one hand, AI supports improvements in climate forecasting, renewable energy management, and real-time detection of environmental degradation.<n>On the other hand, the energy demands of data centres, resource-intensive hardware production, algorithmic bias, corporate concentration of power, and technocratic decision-making reveal contradictions that challenge its sustainability.
• Score: 0.505004805597255
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: The climate crisis requires responses that integrate scientific, ethical, social, and technological perspectives. Artificial intelligence (AI) has emerged as a powerful tool in climate modelling, environmental monitoring, and energy optimisation, yet its growing use also raises critical environmental, ethical, legal, and social questions. This contribution examines the ambivalent role of AI in the ecological crisis, addressing both its promises and its risks. On the one hand, AI supports improvements in climate forecasting, renewable energy management, and real-time detection of environmental degradation. On the other hand, the energy demands of data centres, resource-intensive hardware production, algorithmic bias, corporate concentration of power, and technocratic decision-making reveal contradictions that challenge its sustainability. The discussion explores these issues through interdisciplinary lenses, including environmental ethics, philosophy of technology, and legal governance, and concludes with recommendations for socially just, ecologically responsible, and democratically accountable uses of AI. Rather than assuming AI as an inherently sustainable solution, this analysis argues that its contribution to climate action depends fundamentally on the values, institutions, and power structures that shape its development.

Related papers

• Advancing Science- and Evidence-based AI Policy [163.43609502905707]
  This paper tackles the problem of how to optimize the relationship between evidence and policy to address the opportunities and challenges of AI.<n>An increasing number of efforts address this problem by often either (i) contributing research into the risks of AI and their effective mitigation or (ii) advocating for policy to address these risks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-02T23:20:58Z)
• The Hidden Costs of AI: A Review of Energy, E-Waste, and Inequality in Model Development [0.0]
  Review explores four critical areas where AI's impact extends beyond performance.<n>High emissions from model training, rising hardware turnover, global infrastructure disparities are highlighted.<n>Ultimately, it argues that AI's progress must align with ethical responsibility and environmental stewardship.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-13T12:31:42Z)
• Open and Sustainable AI: challenges, opportunities and the road ahead in the life sciences (October 2025 -- Version 2) [49.142289900583705]
  We review the increased erosion of trust in AI research outputs, driven by the issues of poor reusability.<n>We discuss the fragmented components of the AI ecosystem and lack of guiding pathways to best support Open and Sustainable AI.<n>Our work connects researchers with relevant AI resources, facilitating the implementation of sustainable, reusable and transparent AI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-22T12:52:34Z)
• Bridging the Gap: Integrating Ethics and Environmental Sustainability in AI Research and Practice [57.94036023167952]
  We argue that the efforts aiming to study AI's ethical ramifications should be made in tandem with those evaluating its impacts on the environment.<n>We propose best practices to better integrate AI ethics and sustainability in AI research and practice.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-01T13:53:11Z)
• Climate And Resource Awareness is Imperative to Achieving Sustainable AI (and Preventing a Global AI Arms Race) [6.570828098873743]
  We argue that reconciling climate and resource awareness is essential to realizing the full potential of sustainable AI.<n>We introduce the Climate and Resource Aware Machine Learning (CARAML) framework to address this conflict.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-27T11:54:10Z)
• From Efficiency Gains to Rebound Effects: The Problem of Jevons' Paradox in AI's Polarized Environmental Debate [69.05573887799203]
  We argue that understanding these second-order impacts requires an interdisciplinary approach, combining lifecycle assessments with socio-economic analyses.<n>We contend that a narrow focus on direct emissions misrepresents AI's true climate footprint, limiting the scope for meaningful interventions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-27T22:45:06Z)
• Responsible AI for Earth Observation [10.380878519901998]
  We systematically define the intersection of AI and EO, with a central focus on responsible AI practices. We identify several critical components guiding this exploration from both academia and industry perspectives. The paper explores potential opportunities and emerging trends, providing valuable insights for future research endeavors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-31T14:47:27Z)
• On the Opportunities of Green Computing: A Survey [80.21955522431168]
  Artificial Intelligence (AI) has achieved significant advancements in technology and research with the development over several decades. The needs for high computing power brings higher carbon emission and undermines research fairness. To tackle the challenges of computing resources and environmental impact of AI, Green Computing has become a hot research topic.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-01T11:16:41Z)
• AI For Global Climate Cooperation 2023 Competition Proceedings [77.07135605362795]
  No global authority can ensure compliance with international climate agreements. RICE-N supports modeling regional decision-making using AI agents. The IAM then models the climate-economic impact of those decisions into the future.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-10T20:05:42Z)
• Towards Sustainable Artificial Intelligence: An Overview of Environmental Protection Uses and Issues [0.0]
  This paper describes the paradox of an energy-consuming technology serving the ecological challenges of tomorrow. It draws on numerous examples from AI for Green players to present use cases and concrete examples. The environmental dimension is part of the broader ethical problem of AI, and addressing it is crucial for ensuring the sustainability of AI in the long term.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-22T14:31:48Z)
• Artificial intelligence for Sustainable Energy: A Contextual Topic Modeling and Content Analysis [0.0]
  We offer a novel contextual topic modeling combining LDA, BERT, and Clustering. We then combined these computational analyses with content analysis of related scientific publications to identify the main scholarly topics, sub-themes, and cross-topic themes within scientific research on sustainable AI in energy. Our research identified eight dominant topics including sustainable buildings, AI-based DSSs for urban water management, climate artificial intelligence, Agriculture 4, the convergence of AI with IoT, and AI-based evaluation of renewable technologies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-02T15:51:51Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.