Unveiling Perceptual Artifacts: A Fine-Grained Benchmark for Interpretable AI-Generated Image Detection

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.19430v1
• Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2026 10:09:17 GMT
• Title: Unveiling Perceptual Artifacts: A Fine-Grained Benchmark for Interpretable AI-Generated Image Detection
• Abstract summary: X-AIGD provides pixel-level, categorized annotations of perceptual artifacts, spanning low-level distortions, high-level semantics, and cognitive-level counterfactuals.<n>Existing AIGI detectors demonstrate negligible reliance on perceptual artifacts, even at the most basic distortion level.<n>Explicitly aligning model attention with artifact regions can increase the interpretability and generalization of detectors.
• Score: 95.08316274158165
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Current AI-Generated Image (AIGI) detection approaches predominantly rely on binary classification to distinguish real from synthetic images, often lacking interpretable or convincing evidence to substantiate their decisions. This limitation stems from existing AIGI detection benchmarks, which, despite featuring a broad collection of synthetic images, remain restricted in their coverage of artifact diversity and lack detailed, localized annotations. To bridge this gap, we introduce a fine-grained benchmark towards eXplainable AI-Generated image Detection, named X-AIGD, which provides pixel-level, categorized annotations of perceptual artifacts, spanning low-level distortions, high-level semantics, and cognitive-level counterfactuals. These comprehensive annotations facilitate fine-grained interpretability evaluation and deeper insight into model decision-making processes. Our extensive investigation using X-AIGD provides several key insights: (1) Existing AIGI detectors demonstrate negligible reliance on perceptual artifacts, even at the most basic distortion level. (2) While AIGI detectors can be trained to identify specific artifacts, they still substantially base their judgment on uninterpretable features. (3) Explicitly aligning model attention with artifact regions can increase the interpretability and generalization of detectors. The data and code are available at: https://github.com/Coxy7/X-AIGD.

Related papers

• GenShield: Unified Detection and Artifact Correction for AI-Generated Images [65.11434977803509]
  GenShield is a framework that performs AIGI detection and artifact correction in a closed loop from diagnosis to restoration.<n>A high-quality dataset with large-scale artifact-restored'' pairs is constructed alongside a unified evaluation pipeline.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-15T16:06:20Z)
• ReAlign: Generalizable Image Forgery Detection via Reasoning-Aligned Representation [20.53808948318056]
  The rise of AI-generated images (AIGIs) poses growing challenges for digital authenticity.<n>Existing methods, whether non-LLM-based or LLM-based, exhibit distinct advantages and limitations.<n>We propose ReAlign, a novel framework that distills high-quality reasoning texts into a lightweight AIGI detector.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-15T15:43:44Z)
• Generalizable Detection of AI Generated Images with Large Models and Fuzzy Decision Tree [30.175850837300317]
  malicious use and widespread dissemination of AI-generated images pose a serious threat to the authenticity of digital content.<n>Existing detection methods exploit low-level artifacts left by common manipulation steps within the generation pipeline.<n>We propose a novel AI-generated image detection framework that integrates lightweight artifact-aware detectors with MLLMs via a fuzzy decision tree.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-30T14:43:14Z)
• VAAS: Vision-Attention Anomaly Scoring for Image Manipulation Detection in Digital Forensics [0.0]
  Recent advances in AI-driven image generation have introduced new challenges for verifying the authenticity of digital evidence in forensic investigations.<n>Modern generative models can produce visually consistent forgeries that evade traditional detectors based on pixel or compression artefacts.<n>This paper introduces Vision-Attention Anomaly Scoring (VAAS), a novel dual-module framework that integrates global attention-based anomaly estimation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-17T15:05:40Z)
• Task-Model Alignment: A Simple Path to Generalizable AI-Generated Image Detection [57.17054616831796]
  Vision Language Models (VLMs) are increasingly adopted for AI-generated images (AIGI) detection.<n>VLMs' underperformance is attributed to task-model misalignment.<n>In this paper, we formalize AIGI detection as two complementary tasks--semantic consistency checking and pixel-artifact detection.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-07T09:19:00Z)
• Self-Supervised AI-Generated Image Detection: A Camera Metadata Perspective [80.10217707456046]
  We introduce a self-supervised approach for detecting AI-generated images that leverages camera metadata.<n>We train a feature extractor solely on camera-captured photographs by classifying categorical EXIF tags.<n>Our detectors deliver strong generalization to in-the-wild samples and robustness to common benign image perturbations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-05T11:53:18Z)
• Semantic Visual Anomaly Detection and Reasoning in AI-Generated Images [96.43608872116347]
  AnomReason is a large-scale benchmark with structured annotations as quadruple textbfAnomAgent<n>AnomReason and AnomAgent serve as a foundation for measuring and improving the semantic plausibility of AI-generated images.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-11T14:09:24Z)
• ForenX: Towards Explainable AI-Generated Image Detection with Multimodal Large Language Models [82.04858317800097]
  We present ForenX, a novel method that not only identifies the authenticity of images but also provides explanations that resonate with human thoughts.<n>ForenX employs the powerful multimodal large language models (MLLMs) to analyze and interpret forensic cues.<n>We introduce ForgReason, a dataset dedicated to descriptions of forgery evidences in AI-generated images.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-02T15:21:26Z)
• Is Artificial Intelligence Generated Image Detection a Solved Problem? [16.9828631287303]
  AIGIBench is a benchmark designed to rigorously evaluate the robustness and generalization capabilities of state-of-the-art AIGI detectors.<n>It simulates real-world challenges through four core tasks: multi-source generalization, robustness to image degradation, sensitivity to data augmentation, and impact of test-time pre-processing.<n>It includes 23 diverse fake image subsets that span both advanced and widely adopted image generation techniques, along with real-world samples collected from social media and AI art platforms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-18T10:00:39Z)
• FakeScope: Large Multimodal Expert Model for Transparent AI-Generated Image Forensics [66.14786900470158]
  We propose FakeScope, an expert multimodal model (LMM) tailored for AI-generated image forensics.<n>FakeScope identifies AI-synthetic images with high accuracy and provides rich, interpretable, and query-driven forensic insights.<n>FakeScope achieves state-of-the-art performance in both closed-ended and open-ended forensic scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-31T16:12:48Z)
• Towards Generalizable Forgery Detection and Reasoning [23.858913560970866]
  We formulate detection and explanation as a unified Forgery Detection and Reasoning task (FDR-Task)<n>We introduce the Multi-Modal Forgery Reasoning dataset (MMFR-Dataset), a large-scale dataset containing 120K images across 10 generative models, with 378K reasoning annotations on forgery attributes.<n>Experiments across multiple generative models demonstrate that FakeReasoning achieves robust generalization and outperforms state-of-the-art methods on both detection and reasoning tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-27T06:54:06Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.