Attribution Techniques for Mitigating Hallucinated Information in RAG Systems: A Survey

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.19927v1
• Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2026 04:19:27 GMT
• Title: Attribution Techniques for Mitigating Hallucinated Information in RAG Systems: A Survey
• Authors: Yuqing Zhao, Ziyao Liu, Yongsen Zheng, Kwok-Yan Lam,
• Abstract summary: Large Language Models (LLMs)-based question answering systems play a critical role in modern AI.<n>LLMs-generated responses often suffer from hallucinations, unfaithful statements lacking reliable references.<n>This survey investigates how attribution-based techniques are used within RAG systems to mitigate hallucinations.
• Score: 32.31859104084246
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs)-based question answering (QA) systems play a critical role in modern AI, demonstrating strong performance across various tasks. However, LLM-generated responses often suffer from hallucinations, unfaithful statements lacking reliable references. Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) frameworks enhance LLM responses by incorporating external references but also introduce new forms of hallucination due to complex interactions between the retriever and generator. To address these challenges, researchers have explored attribution-based techniques that ensure responses are verifiably supported by retrieved content. Despite progress, a unified pipeline for these techniques, along with a clear taxonomy and systematic comparison of their strengths and weaknesses, remains lacking. A well-defined taxonomy is essential for identifying specific failure modes within RAG systems, while comparative analysis helps practitioners choose appropriate solutions based on hallucination types and application context. This survey investigates how attribution-based techniques are used within RAG systems to mitigate hallucinations and addresses the gap by: (i) outlining a taxonomy of hallucination types in RAG systems, (ii) presenting a unified pipeline for attribution techniques, (iii) reviewing techniques based on the hallucinations they target, and (iv) discussing strengths and weaknesses with practical guidelines. This work offers insights for future research and practical use of attribution techniques in RAG systems.

Related papers

• Multi-hop Reasoning via Early Knowledge Alignment [68.28168992785896]
  Early Knowledge Alignment (EKA) aims to align Large Language Models with contextually relevant retrieved knowledge.<n>EKA significantly improves retrieval precision, reduces cascading errors, and enhances both performance and efficiency.<n>EKA proves effective as a versatile, training-free inference strategy that scales seamlessly to large models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-23T08:14:44Z)
• ReAG: Reasoning-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-based Visual Question Answering [54.72902502486611]
  ReAG is a Reasoning-Augmented Multimodal RAG approach that combines coarse- and fine-grained retrieval with a critic model that filters irrelevant passages.<n>ReAG significantly outperforms prior methods, improving answer accuracy and providing interpretable reasoning grounded in retrieved evidence.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-27T19:01:02Z)
• Mitigating Hallucination in Large Language Models (LLMs): An Application-Oriented Survey on RAG, Reasoning, and Agentic Systems [3.7722124918244506]
  Hallucination remains one of the key obstacles to the reliable deployment of large language models.<n>Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) and reasoning enhancement have emerged as two of the most effective and widely adopted approaches.<n>This survey adopts an application-oriented perspective to analyze how RAG, reasoning enhancement, and their integration in Agentic Systems hallucinations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-28T14:48:57Z)
• RAGCap-Bench: Benchmarking Capabilities of LLMs in Agentic Retrieval Augmented Generation Systems [31.4909149697414]
  Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) mitigates key limitations of Large Language Models (LLMs)<n>Recent work extends this paradigm through agentic RAG systems, where LLMs act as agents to iteratively plan, retrieve, and reason over complex queries.<n>We propose RAGCap-Bench, a capability-oriented benchmark for fine-grained evaluation of intermediate tasks in agentic RAG.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-15T04:13:00Z)
• LUMINA: Detecting Hallucinations in RAG System with Context-Knowledge Signals [7.61196995380844]
  Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) aims to mitigate hallucinations in large language models (LLMs) by grounding responses in retrieved documents.<n>Yet, RAG-based LLMs still hallucinate even when provided with correct and sufficient context.<n>We propose LUMINA, a novel framework that detects hallucinations in RAG systems through context-knowledge signals.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-26T04:57:46Z)
• Enhancing Retrieval Augmentation via Adversarial Collaboration [50.117273835877334]
  We propose the Adrial Collaboration RAG (AC-RAG) framework to address "Retrieval Hallucinations"<n>AC-RAG employs two heterogeneous agents: a generalist Detector that identifies knowledge gaps, and a domain-specialized Resolver that provides precise solutions.<n>Experiments show that AC-RAG significantly improves retrieval accuracy and outperforms state-of-the-art RAG methods across various vertical domains.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-18T08:54:20Z)
• Towards Agentic RAG with Deep Reasoning: A Survey of RAG-Reasoning Systems in LLMs [69.10441885629787]
  Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) lifts the factuality of Large Language Models (LLMs) by injecting external knowledge.<n>It falls short on problems that demand multi-step inference; conversely, purely reasoning-oriented approaches often hallucinate or mis-ground facts.<n>This survey synthesizes both strands under a unified reasoning-retrieval perspective.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-13T03:29:41Z)
• Faithfulness-Aware Uncertainty Quantification for Fact-Checking the Output of Retrieval Augmented Generation [108.13261761812517]
  We introduce FRANQ (Faithfulness-based Retrieval Augmented UNcertainty Quantification), a novel method for hallucination detection in RAG outputs.<n>We present a new long-form Question Answering (QA) dataset annotated for both factuality and faithfulness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-27T11:56:59Z)
• Towards More Robust Retrieval-Augmented Generation: Evaluating RAG Under Adversarial Poisoning Attacks [45.07581174558107]
  Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) systems have emerged as a promising solution to mitigate hallucinations.<n>RAG systems are vulnerable to adversarial poisoning attacks, where malicious passages injected into the retrieval corpus can mislead models into producing factually incorrect outputs.<n>We present a rigorously controlled empirical study of how RAG systems behave under such attacks and how their robustness can be improved.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-21T17:31:52Z)
• Unanswerability Evaluation for Retrieval Augmented Generation [74.3022365715597]
  UAEval4RAG is a framework designed to evaluate whether RAG systems can handle unanswerable queries effectively.<n>We define a taxonomy with six unanswerable categories, and UAEval4RAG automatically synthesizes diverse and challenging queries.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-16T19:11:55Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.