RAGCap-Bench: Benchmarking Capabilities of LLMs in Agentic Retrieval Augmented Generation Systems
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2510.13910v1
- Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2025 04:13:00 GMT
- Title: RAGCap-Bench: Benchmarking Capabilities of LLMs in Agentic Retrieval Augmented Generation Systems
- Authors: Jingru Lin, Chen Zhang, Stephen Y. Liu, Haizhou Li,
- Abstract summary: Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) mitigates key limitations of Large Language Models (LLMs)<n>Recent work extends this paradigm through agentic RAG systems, where LLMs act as agents to iteratively plan, retrieve, and reason over complex queries.<n>We propose RAGCap-Bench, a capability-oriented benchmark for fine-grained evaluation of intermediate tasks in agentic RAG.
- Score: 31.4909149697414
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) mitigates key limitations of Large Language Models (LLMs)-such as factual errors, outdated knowledge, and hallucinations-by dynamically retrieving external information. Recent work extends this paradigm through agentic RAG systems, where LLMs act as agents to iteratively plan, retrieve, and reason over complex queries. However, these systems still struggle with challenging multi-hop questions, and their intermediate reasoning capabilities remain underexplored. To address this, we propose RAGCap-Bench, a capability-oriented benchmark for fine-grained evaluation of intermediate tasks in agentic RAG workflows. We analyze outputs from state-of-the-art systems to identify common tasks and the core capabilities required for their execution, then construct a taxonomy of typical LLM errors to design targeted evaluation questions. Experiments show that "slow-thinking" models with stronger RAGCap performance achieve better end-to-end results, underscoring the benchmark's validity and the importance of enhancing these intermediate capabilities.
Related papers
- AgentLongBench: A Controllable Long Benchmark For Long-Contexts Agents via Environment Rollouts [78.33143446024485]
We introduce textbfAgentLongBench, which evaluates agents through simulated environment rollouts based on Lateral Thinking Puzzles.<n>This framework generates rigorous interaction trajectories across knowledge-intensive and knowledge-free scenarios.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-28T16:05:44Z) - Is Agentic RAG worth it? An experimental comparison of RAG approaches [0.07777489763207261]
"Retrieval-Augmented Generation" systems are usually defined by the combination of a generator and a retrieval component.<n>These shortcomings have motivated the development of "Enhanced" RAG.<n>The growing self-reflective capabilities of Large Language Models have enabled a new paradigm, which we refer to as "Agentic" RAG.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-12T16:43:44Z) - Multi-hop Reasoning via Early Knowledge Alignment [68.28168992785896]
Early Knowledge Alignment (EKA) aims to align Large Language Models with contextually relevant retrieved knowledge.<n>EKA significantly improves retrieval precision, reduces cascading errors, and enhances both performance and efficiency.<n>EKA proves effective as a versatile, training-free inference strategy that scales seamlessly to large models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-12-23T08:14:44Z) - GRIL: Knowledge Graph Retrieval-Integrated Learning with Large Language Models [59.72897499248909]
We propose a novel graph retriever trained end-to-end with Large Language Models (LLMs)<n>Within the extracted subgraph, structural knowledge and semantic features are encoded via soft tokens and the verbalized graph, respectively, which are infused into the LLM together.<n>Our approach consistently achieves state-of-the-art performance, validating the strength of joint graph-LLM optimization for complex reasoning tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-09-20T02:38:00Z) - Agentic Reinforced Policy Optimization [66.96989268893932]
Large-scale reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) has demonstrated its effectiveness in harnessing the potential of large language models (LLMs) for single-turn reasoning tasks.<n>Current RL algorithms inadequately balance the models' intrinsic long-horizon reasoning capabilities and their proficiency in multi-turn tool interactions.<n>We propose Agentic Reinforced Policy Optimization (ARPO), a novel agentic RL algorithm tailored for training multi-turn LLM-based agents.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-07-26T07:53:11Z) - ReMA: Learning to Meta-think for LLMs with Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning [53.817538122688944]
We introduce Reinforced Meta-thinking Agents (ReMA) to elicit meta-thinking behaviors from Reasoning of Large Language Models (LLMs)<n>ReMA decouples the reasoning process into two hierarchical agents: a high-level meta-thinking agent responsible for generating strategic oversight and plans, and a low-level reasoning agent for detailed executions.<n> Empirical results from single-turn experiments demonstrate that ReMA outperforms single-agent RL baselines on complex reasoning tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-12T16:05:31Z) - Agentic Retrieval-Augmented Generation: A Survey on Agentic RAG [0.8463972278020965]
Large Language Models (LLMs) have revolutionized artificial intelligence (AI) by enabling human like text generation and natural language understanding.<n>Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) has emerged as a solution, enhancing LLMs by integrating real time data retrieval to provide contextually relevant responses.<n>Agentic Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) transcends these limitations by embedding autonomous AI agents into the RAG pipeline.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-01-15T20:40:25Z) - A Survey of Query Optimization in Large Language Models [10.255235456427037]
RAG mitigates the limitations of Large Language Models by dynamically retrieving and leveraging up-to-date relevant information.<n>QO has emerged as a critical element, playing a pivotal role in determining the effectiveness of RAG's retrieval stage.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-12-23T13:26:04Z) - Don't Do RAG: When Cache-Augmented Generation is All You Need for Knowledge Tasks [11.053340674721005]
Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) has gained traction as a powerful approach for enhancing language models by integrating external knowledge sources.<n>This paper proposes an alternative paradigm, cache-augmented generation (CAG) that bypasses real-time retrieval.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-12-20T06:58:32Z) - RAG-Star: Enhancing Deliberative Reasoning with Retrieval Augmented Verification and Refinement [85.08223786819532]
Existing large language models (LLMs) show exceptional problem-solving capabilities but might struggle with complex reasoning tasks.<n>We propose textbfRAG-Star, a novel RAG approach that integrates retrieved information to guide the tree-based deliberative reasoning process.<n>Our experiments involving Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct and GPT-4o demonstrate that RAG-Star significantly outperforms previous RAG and reasoning methods.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-12-17T13:05:36Z) - RAG-Modulo: Solving Sequential Tasks using Experience, Critics, and Language Models [5.0741409008225755]
Large language models (LLMs) have emerged as promising tools for solving challenging robotic tasks.
Most existing LLM-based agents lack the ability to retain and learn from past interactions.
We propose RAG-Modulo, a framework that enhances LLM-based agents with a memory of past interactions and incorporates critics to evaluate the agents' decisions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-09-18T20:03:32Z) - RAGEval: Scenario Specific RAG Evaluation Dataset Generation Framework [66.93260816493553]
This paper introduces RAGEval, a framework designed to assess RAG systems across diverse scenarios.<n>With a focus on factual accuracy, we propose three novel metrics: Completeness, Hallucination, and Irrelevance.<n> Experimental results show that RAGEval outperforms zero-shot and one-shot methods in terms of clarity, safety, conformity, and richness of generated samples.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-08-02T13:35:11Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.