Like a Therapist, But Not: Reddit Narratives of AI in Mental Health Contexts

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.20747v1
• Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2026 16:23:00 GMT
• Title: Like a Therapist, But Not: Reddit Narratives of AI in Mental Health Contexts
• Authors: Elham Aghakhani, Rezvaneh Rezapour,
• Abstract summary: We analyze 5,126 Reddit posts describing experiential or exploratory use of AI for emotional support or therapy.<n>Our results show that engagement is shaped primarily by narrated outcomes, trust, and response quality, rather than emotional bond alone.<n>Overall, this work demonstrates how theory-grounded constructs can be operationalized in large-scale discourse analysis.
• Score: 3.532061394511271
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used for emotional support and mental health-related interactions outside clinical settings, yet little is known about how people evaluate and relate to these systems in everyday use. We analyze 5,126 Reddit posts from 47 mental health communities describing experiential or exploratory use of AI for emotional support or therapy. Grounded in the Technology Acceptance Model and therapeutic alliance theory, we develop a theory-informed annotation framework and apply a hybrid LLM-human pipeline to analyze evaluative language, adoption-related attitudes, and relational alignment at scale. Our results show that engagement is shaped primarily by narrated outcomes, trust, and response quality, rather than emotional bond alone. Positive sentiment is most strongly associated with task and goal alignment, while companionship-oriented use more often involves misaligned alliances and reported risks such as dependence and symptom escalation. Overall, this work demonstrates how theory-grounded constructs can be operationalized in large-scale discourse analysis and highlights the importance of studying how users interpret language technologies in sensitive, real-world contexts.

Related papers

• Mental Health Impacts of AI Companions: Triangulating Social Media Quasi-Experiments, User Perspectives, and Relational Theory [18.716972390545703]
  We examined how engaging with AICCs shaped wellbeing and how users perceived these experiences.<n>Findings revealed mixed effects -- greater affective and grief expression, readability, and interpersonal focus.<n>We offer design implications for AI companions that scaffold healthy boundaries, support mindful engagement, support disclosure without dependency, and surface relationship stages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-26T15:47:37Z)
• Beyond Empathy: Integrating Diagnostic and Therapeutic Reasoning with Large Language Models for Mental Health Counseling [50.83055329849865]
  PsyLLM is a large language model designed to integrate diagnostic and therapeutic reasoning for mental health counseling.<n>It processes real-world mental health posts from Reddit and generates multi-turn dialogue structures.<n>Our experiments demonstrate that PsyLLM significantly outperforms state-of-the-art baseline models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-21T16:24:49Z)
• Sentient Agent as a Judge: Evaluating Higher-Order Social Cognition in Large Language Models [75.85319609088354]
  Sentient Agent as a Judge (SAGE) is an evaluation framework for large language models.<n>SAGE instantiates a Sentient Agent that simulates human-like emotional changes and inner thoughts during interaction.<n>SAGE provides a principled, scalable and interpretable tool for tracking progress toward genuinely empathetic and socially adept language agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-01T19:06:10Z)
• "It Listens Better Than My Therapist": Exploring Social Media Discourse on LLMs as Mental Health Tool [1.223779595809275]
  Large language models (LLMs) offer new capabilities in conversational fluency, empathy simulation, and availability.<n>This study explores how users engage with LLMs as mental health tools by analyzing over 10,000 TikTok comments.<n>Results show that nearly 20% of comments reflect personal use, with these users expressing overwhelmingly positive attitudes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-14T17:37:32Z)
• The Emotional Spectrum of LLMs: Leveraging Empathy and Emotion-Based Markers for Mental Health Support [41.463376100442396]
  RACLETTE is a conversational system that demonstrates superior emotional accuracy compared to state-of-the-art benchmarks.<n>We show how the emotional profiles of a user can be used as interpretable markers for mental health assessment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-28T07:42:29Z)
• Evaluating Large Language Models with Psychometrics [59.821829073478376]
  This paper offers a comprehensive benchmark for quantifying psychological constructs of Large Language Models (LLMs)<n>Our work identifies five key psychological constructs -- personality, values, emotional intelligence, theory of mind, and self-efficacy -- assessed through a suite of 13 datasets.<n>We uncover significant discrepancies between LLMs' self-reported traits and their response patterns in real-world scenarios, revealing complexities in their behaviors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-25T16:09:08Z)
• Evaluating the Efficacy of Interactive Language Therapy Based on LLM for High-Functioning Autistic Adolescent Psychological Counseling [1.1780706927049207]
  This study investigates the efficacy of Large Language Models (LLMs) in interactive language therapy for high-functioning autistic adolescents. LLMs present a novel opportunity to augment traditional psychological counseling methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-12T07:55:39Z)
• NLP as a Lens for Causal Analysis and Perception Mining to Infer Mental Health on Social Media [10.342474142256842]
  We argue that more consequential and explainable research is required for optimal impact on clinical psychology practice and personalized mental healthcare. Within the scope of Natural Language Processing (NLP), we explore critical areas of inquiry associated with Causal analysis and Perception mining. We advocate for a more explainable approach toward modeling computational psychology problems through the lens of language.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-26T09:26:01Z)
• Co-Located Human-Human Interaction Analysis using Nonverbal Cues: A Survey [71.43956423427397]
  We aim to identify the nonverbal cues and computational methodologies resulting in effective performance. This survey differs from its counterparts by involving the widest spectrum of social phenomena and interaction settings. Some major observations are: the most often used nonverbal cue, computational method, interaction environment, and sensing approach are speaking activity, support vector machines, and meetings composed of 3-4 persons equipped with microphones and cameras, respectively.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-20T13:37:57Z)
• Disambiguating Affective Stimulus Associations for Robot Perception and Dialogue [67.89143112645556]
  We provide a NICO robot with the ability to learn the associations between a perceived auditory stimulus and an emotional expression. NICO is able to do this for both individual subjects and specific stimuli, with the aid of an emotion-driven dialogue system. The robot is then able to use this information to determine a subject's enjoyment of perceived auditory stimuli in a real HRI scenario.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-05T20:55:48Z)
• MET: Multimodal Perception of Engagement for Telehealth [52.54282887530756]
  We present MET, a learning-based algorithm for perceiving a human's level of engagement from videos. We release a new dataset, MEDICA, for mental health patient engagement detection.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-17T15:18:38Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.