Mitigating Overthinking in Large Reasoning Models via Difficulty-aware Reinforcement Learning

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.21418v1
• Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2026 08:56:45 GMT
• Title: Mitigating Overthinking in Large Reasoning Models via Difficulty-aware Reinforcement Learning
• Authors: Qian Wan, Ziao Xu, Luona Wei, Xiaoxuan Shen, Jianwen Sun,
• Abstract summary: Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) achieve explicit chain-of-thought expansion by imitating deep thinking behaviors of humans.<n>However, the deep-thinking mode often leads to unnecessarily lengthy reasoning and resource inefficiency when handling simple tasks.<n>This paper proposes Difficulty-aware Policy Optimization (DiPO), a reinforcement learning-based LRM training framework.
• Score: 13.096138112729358
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) achieve explicit chain-of-thought expansion by imitating deep thinking behaviors of humans, demonstrating excellent performance in complex task scenarios. However, the deep-thinking mode often leads to unnecessarily lengthy reasoning and resource inefficiency when handling simple tasks. This overthinking phenomenon may arise from the generation preference triggered by the reward function during post-training. Existing research attempts to mitigate overthinking from the perspective of prompt design or model training, but generally underestimates the importance of task difficulty awareness, which makes it difficult for LRMs to effectively allocate reasoning resources. In this paper, we propose Difficulty-aware Policy Optimization (DiPO), a reinforcement learning-based LRM training framework. DiPO encourages LRM to spontaneously model task complexity, and integrates them into reinforcement learning framework to adjust the generation preferences introduced by post-training. A difficulty modeling method based on model self-reasoning is proposed, which significantly reduces the dependence on manual annotation and formalize task complexity. We further develop a difficulty-signal-enhanced reward function that incorporates a penalty for lengthy reasoning while considering reasoning performance and output format. Experimental results indicate that DiPO enables the model to spontaneously adjust inference overhead, significantly reducing redundant tokens without losing performance due to thought compression.

Related papers

• Native Reasoning Models: Training Language Models to Reason on Unverifiable Data [16.065264121785294]
  We introduce NRT (Native Reasoning Training), a novel framework that cultivates complex reasoning.<n>NRT reframes the training problem by treating the reasoning process as a latent variable.<n>NRT achieves state-of-the-art performance among verifier-free methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-12T04:15:46Z)
• Accordion-Thinking: Self-Regulated Step Summaries for Efficient and Readable LLM Reasoning [62.680551162054975]
  We introduce an end-to-end framework where LLMs learn to self-regulate the granularity of the reasoning steps through dynamic summarization.<n>We apply reinforcement learning to incentivize this capability further, uncovering a critical insight: the accuracy gap between the highly efficient Fold mode and the exhaustive Unfold mode progressively narrows.<n>Our Accordion-Thinker demonstrates that with learned self-compression, LLMs can tackle complex reasoning tasks with minimal dependency token overhead.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-03T08:34:20Z)
• Less is More Tokens: Efficient Math Reasoning via Difficulty-Aware Chain-of-Thought Distillation [82.2288581878096]
  We present a framework for difficulty-aware reasoning that teaches models to dynamically adjust reasoning depth based on problem complexity.<n>We show that models can be endowed with such dynamic inference pathways without any architectural modifications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-05T16:40:13Z)
• Think How to Think: Mitigating Overthinking with Autonomous Difficulty Cognition in Large Reasoning Models [22.57102686737925]
  Recent Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) excel at complex reasoning tasks but often suffer from overthinking.<n>We propose Think-How-to-Think (TH2T), a novel two-stage fine-tuning strategy that progressively inspires LRMs' difficulty cognition and redundancy cognition.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-03T14:24:26Z)
• Exploring and Exploiting the Inherent Efficiency within Large Reasoning Models for Self-Guided Efficiency Enhancement [101.77467538102924]
  Large reasoning models (LRMs) exhibit overthinking, which hinders efficiency and inflates inference cost.<n>We propose two lightweight methods to enhance LRM efficiency.<n>First, we introduce Efficiency Steering, a training-free activation steering technique that modulates reasoning behavior via a single direction.<n>Second, we develop Self-Rewarded Efficiency RL, a reinforcement learning framework that dynamically balances task accuracy and brevity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-18T17:18:12Z)
• Incentivizing Dual Process Thinking for Efficient Large Language Model Reasoning [75.04643265875072]
  Large reasoning models (LRMs) have demonstrated strong performance on complex reasoning tasks, but often suffer from overthinking.<n>Inspired by the dual process theory in cognitive science, we propose Adaptive Cognition Policy Optimization.<n>ACPO enables LRMs to achieve efficient reasoning through adaptive cognitive allocation and dynamic system switch.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-22T07:15:08Z)
• Let LRMs Break Free from Overthinking via Self-Braking Tuning [68.93713497579853]
  Large reasoning models (LRMs) have significantly enhanced their reasoning capabilities by generating longer chains of thought.<n>This performance gain comes at the cost of a substantial increase in redundant reasoning during the generation process.<n>We propose a novel framework, Self-Braking Tuning (SBT), which tackles overthinking from the perspective of allowing the model to regulate its own reasoning process.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-20T16:53:40Z)
• SHARP: Synthesizing High-quality Aligned Reasoning Problems for Large Reasoning Models Reinforcement Learning [19.457621121430464]
  Training large reasoning models (LRMs) with reinforcement learning in STEM domains is hindered by the scarcity of high-quality, diverse, and verifiable problem sets.<n>We introduce SHARP, a unified approach to Synthesizing High-quality Aligned Reasoning Problems for LRMs reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR)<n>We implement SHARP by leveraging a state-of-the-art LRM to infer and verify challenging STEM questions, then employ a reinforcement learning loop to refine the model's reasoning through verifiable reward signals.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-20T09:54:42Z)
• Trade-offs in Large Reasoning Models: An Empirical Analysis of Deliberative and Adaptive Reasoning over Foundational Capabilities [101.77467538102924]
  Recent advancements in Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) have demonstrated remarkable performance in specialized reasoning tasks.<n>We show that acquiring deliberative reasoning capabilities significantly reduces the foundational capabilities of LRMs.<n>We demonstrate that adaptive reasoning -- employing modes like Zero-Thinking, Less-Thinking, and Summary-Thinking -- can effectively alleviate these drawbacks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-23T08:18:51Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.