RAG-E: Quantifying Retriever-Generator Alignment and Failure Modes

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.21803v1
• Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2026 14:47:00 GMT
• Title: RAG-E: Quantifying Retriever-Generator Alignment and Failure Modes
• Authors: Korbinian Randl, Guido Rocchietti, Aron Henriksson, Ziawasch Abedjan, Tony Lindgren, John Pavlopoulos,
• Abstract summary: RAG-E is an end-to-end explainability framework that quantifies retriever-generator alignment through mathematically grounded attribution methods.<n>We show that RAG output quality depends not solely on individual component performance but on their interplay, which can be audited via RAG-E.
• Score: 10.900031381533354
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) systems combine dense retrievers and language models to ground LLM outputs in retrieved documents. However, the opacity of how these components interact creates challenges for deployment in high-stakes domains. We present RAG-E, an end-to-end explainability framework that quantifies retriever-generator alignment through mathematically grounded attribution methods. Our approach adapts Integrated Gradients for retriever analysis, introduces PMCSHAP, a Monte Carlo-stabilized Shapley Value approximation, for generator attribution, and introduces the Weighted Attribution-Relevance Gap (WARG) metric to measure how well a generator's document usage aligns with a retriever's ranking. Empirical analysis on TREC CAsT and FoodSafeSum reveals critical misalignments: for 47.4% to 66.7% of queries, generators ignore the retriever's top-ranked documents, while 48.1% to 65.9% rely on documents ranked as less relevant. These failure modes demonstrate that RAG output quality depends not solely on individual component performance but on their interplay, which can be audited via RAG-E.

Related papers

• SAGE: Benchmarking and Improving Retrieval for Deep Research Agents [60.53966065867568]
  We introduce SAGE, a benchmark for scientific literature retrieval comprising 1,200 queries across four scientific domains, with a 200,000 paper retrieval corpus.<n>We evaluate six deep research agents and find that all systems struggle with reasoning-intensive retrieval.<n> BM25 significantly outperforms LLM-based retrievers by approximately 30%, as existing agents generate keyword-oriented sub-queries.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-05T18:25:24Z)
• SIRAG: Towards Stable and Interpretable RAG with A Process-Supervised Multi-Agent Framework [7.37561751991963]
  We propose a process-supervised multi-agent framework to bridge the gap between retriever and generator.<n>The proposed framework is modular and plug-and-play, requiring no modification to the retriever or generator.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-17T09:09:28Z)
• Attributing Response to Context: A Jensen-Shannon Divergence Driven Mechanistic Study of Context Attribution in Retrieval-Augmented Generation [52.3707788779464]
  We introduce a novel Jensen-Shannon Divergence driven method to Attribute Response to Context (ARC-JSD)<n>ARC-JSD enables efficient and accurate identification of essential context sentences without additional fine-tuning, gradient-calculation or surrogate modelling.<n> Evaluations on a wide range of RAG benchmarks, such as TyDi QA, Hotpot QA, and Musique, using instruction-tuned LLMs in different scales demonstrate superior accuracy and significant computational efficiency improvements.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-22T09:04:03Z)
• MIRAGE: A Metric-Intensive Benchmark for Retrieval-Augmented Generation Evaluation [8.950307082012763]
  Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) has gained prominence as an effective method for enhancing the generative capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs)<n>We present MIRAGE, a Question Answering dataset specifically designed for RAG evaluation.<n>MIRAGE consists of 7,560 curated instances mapped to a retrieval pool of 37,800 entries, enabling an efficient and precise evaluation of both retrieval and generation tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-23T23:05:46Z)
• MAIN-RAG: Multi-Agent Filtering Retrieval-Augmented Generation [34.66546005629471]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) are essential tools for various natural language processing tasks but often suffer from generating outdated or incorrect information.<n>Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) addresses this issue by incorporating external, real-time information retrieval to ground LLM responses.<n>To tackle this problem, we propose Multi-Agent Filtering Retrieval-Augmented Generation (MAIN-RAG)<n>MAIN-RAG is a training-free RAG framework that leverages multiple LLM agents to collaboratively filter and score retrieved documents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-31T08:07:26Z)
• Unanswerability Evaluation for Retrieval Augmented Generation [74.3022365715597]
  UAEval4RAG is a framework designed to evaluate whether RAG systems can handle unanswerable queries effectively.<n>We define a taxonomy with six unanswerable categories, and UAEval4RAG automatically synthesizes diverse and challenging queries.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-16T19:11:55Z)
• Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Domain-Specific Question Answering: A Case Study on Pittsburgh and CMU [3.1787418271023404]
  We designed a Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) system to provide large language models with relevant documents for answering domain-specific questions. We extracted over 1,800 subpages using a greedy scraping strategy and employed a hybrid annotation process, combining manual and Mistral-generated question-answer pairs. Our RAG framework integrates BM25 and FAISS retrievers, enhanced with a reranker for improved document retrieval accuracy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-20T20:10:43Z)
• RAGChecker: A Fine-grained Framework for Diagnosing Retrieval-Augmented Generation [61.14660526363607]
  We propose a fine-grained evaluation framework, RAGChecker, that incorporates a suite of diagnostic metrics for both the retrieval and generation modules. RAGChecker has significantly better correlations with human judgments than other evaluation metrics. The metrics of RAGChecker can guide researchers and practitioners in developing more effective RAG systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-15T10:20:54Z)
• RAGEval: Scenario Specific RAG Evaluation Dataset Generation Framework [66.93260816493553]
  This paper introduces RAGEval, a framework designed to assess RAG systems across diverse scenarios.<n>With a focus on factual accuracy, we propose three novel metrics: Completeness, Hallucination, and Irrelevance.<n> Experimental results show that RAGEval outperforms zero-shot and one-shot methods in terms of clarity, safety, conformity, and richness of generated samples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-02T13:35:11Z)
• Blended RAG: Improving RAG (Retriever-Augmented Generation) Accuracy with Semantic Search and Hybrid Query-Based Retrievers [0.0]
  Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) is a prevalent approach to infuse a private knowledge base of documents with Large Language Models (LLM) to build Generative Q&A (Question-Answering) systems. We propose the 'Blended RAG' method of leveraging semantic search techniques, such as Vector indexes and Sparse indexes, blended with hybrid query strategies. Our study achieves better retrieval results and sets new benchmarks for IR (Information Retrieval) datasets like NQ and TREC-COVID datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-22T17:13:46Z)
• RAGGED: Towards Informed Design of Scalable and Stable RAG Systems [51.171355532527365]
  Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) enhances language models by integrating external knowledge.<n>RAGGED is a framework for systematically evaluating RAG systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-14T02:26:31Z)
• ARES: An Automated Evaluation Framework for Retrieval-Augmented Generation Systems [46.522527144802076]
  We introduce ARES, an Automated RAG Evaluation System, for evaluating RAG systems. ARES finetunes lightweight LM judges to assess the quality of individual RAG components. We make our code and datasets publicly available on Github.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-16T00:39:39Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.