MMFineReason: Closing the Multimodal Reasoning Gap via Open Data-Centric Methods

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.21821v1
• Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2026 15:07:28 GMT
• Title: MMFineReason: Closing the Multimodal Reasoning Gap via Open Data-Centric Methods
• Authors: Honglin Lin, Zheng Liu, Yun Zhu, Chonghan Qin, Juekai Lin, Xiaoran Shang, Conghui He, Wentao Zhang, Lijun Wu,
• Abstract summary: We introduce MMFineReason, a large-scale multimodal reasoning dataset comprising 1.8M samples and 5.1B solution tokens.<n>The resulting dataset spans STEM problems, visual puzzles, games, and complex diagrams, with each sample annotated with visually grounded reasoning traces.<n>Our models establish new state-of-the-art results for their size class.
• Score: 41.49799689399879
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Recent advances in Vision Language Models (VLMs) have driven significant progress in visual reasoning. However, open-source VLMs still lag behind proprietary systems, largely due to the lack of high-quality reasoning data. Existing datasets offer limited coverage of challenging domains such as STEM diagrams and visual puzzles, and lack consistent, long-form Chain-of-Thought (CoT) annotations essential for eliciting strong reasoning capabilities. To bridge this gap, we introduce MMFineReason, a large-scale multimodal reasoning dataset comprising 1.8M samples and 5.1B solution tokens, featuring high-quality reasoning annotations distilled from Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B-Thinking. The dataset is established via a systematic three-stage pipeline: (1) large-scale data collection and standardization, (2) CoT rationale generation, and (3) comprehensive selection based on reasoning quality and difficulty awareness. The resulting dataset spans STEM problems, visual puzzles, games, and complex diagrams, with each sample annotated with visually grounded reasoning traces. We fine-tune Qwen3-VL-Instruct on MMFineReason to develop MMFineReason-2B/4B/8B versions. Our models establish new state-of-the-art results for their size class. Notably, MMFineReason-4B succesfully surpasses Qwen3-VL-8B-Thinking, and MMFineReason-8B even outperforms Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Thinking while approaching Qwen3-VL-32B-Thinking, demonstrating remarkable parameter efficiency. Crucially, we uncover a "less is more" phenomenon via our difficulty-aware filtering strategy: a subset of just 7\% (123K samples) achieves performance comparable to the full dataset. Notably, we reveal a synergistic effect where reasoning-oriented data composition simultaneously boosts general capabilities.

Related papers

• CHIMERA: Compact Synthetic Data for Generalizable LLM Reasoning [44.519834940763964]
  CHIMERA is a compact synthetic reasoning dataset comprising 9K samples for generalizable cross-domain reasoning.<n>It has broad and structured coverage, spanning 8 major scientific disciplines and over 1K fine-grained topics organized via a model-generated hierarchical taxonomy.<n>It achieves strong performance on a suite of challenging reasoning benchmarks, including GPQA-Diamond, AIME 24/25/26, HMMT 25, and Humanity's Last Exam.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-01T03:23:41Z)
• ChartVerse: Scaling Chart Reasoning via Reliable Programmatic Synthesis from Scratch [57.01439313241121]
  We introduce Rollout Posterior Entropy (RPE), a novel metric that quantifies chart complexity.<n>We also develop truth-anchored inverse QA synthesis to guarantee reasoning rigor.<n>To further elevate difficulty and reasoning depth, we filter samples based on model fail-rate and distill high-quality Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-20T05:11:44Z)
• Long Grounded Thoughts: Distilling Compositional Visual Reasoning Chains at Scale [70.23466957404891]
  We introduce a new reasoning data generation framework spanning diverse skills and levels of complexity with over 1M high-quality synthetic vision-centric questions.<n>We show that finetuning Qwen2.5-VL-7B on our data outperforms all open-data baselines across all evaluated vision-centric benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-07T20:50:54Z)
• VERITAS: Leveraging Vision Priors and Expert Fusion to Improve Multimodal Data [3.638465758795032]
  VERITAS is a pipeline that integrates vision priors and multiple state-of-the-art LMMs to enhance SFT data quality.<n>Three LMMs evaluate the original answers, providing critique rationales and scores that are statistically fused into a high-confidence consensus score.<n>Our critic model exhibits enhanced capability comparable to state-of-the-art LMMs while being significantly more efficient.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-17T05:13:50Z)
• Truth in the Few: High-Value Data Selection for Efficient Multi-Modal Reasoning [71.3533541927459]
  We propose a novel data selection paradigm termed Activation Reasoning Potential (RAP)<n>RAP identifies cognitive samples by estimating each sample's potential to stimulate genuine multi-modal reasoning.<n>Our RAP method consistently achieves superior performance using only 9.3% of the training data, while reducing computational costs by over 43%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-05T08:40:24Z)
• Observe-R1: Unlocking Reasoning Abilities of MLLMs with Dynamic Progressive Reinforcement Learning [3.364797975300393]
  We present Observe-R1, a novel framework aimed at enhancing the reasoning capabilities of multimodal large language models (MLLMs)<n>We construct the NeuraLadder dataset, which is organized and sampled according to the difficulty and complexity of data samples for RL training.<n>Experiments with the Qwen2.5-VL-3B and Qwen2.5-VL-7B models on 20k samples from the NeuraLadder dataset show that Observe-R1 outperforms a series of larger reasoning models on both reasoning and general benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-18T14:08:03Z)
• Exploring the Effect of Reinforcement Learning on Video Understanding: Insights from SEED-Bench-R1 [53.894789613838654]
  We introduce SEED-Bench-R1, a benchmark designed to evaluate post-training methods for MLLMs in video understanding.<n>It includes intricate real-world videos and complex everyday planning tasks in the format of multiple-choice questions.<n>Using Qwen2-VL-Instruct-7B as a base model, we compare RL with supervised fine-tuning (SFT)<n>Our detailed analysis reveals that RL enhances visual perception but often produces less coherent reasoning chains.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-31T17:55:23Z)
• Reason-RFT: Reinforcement Fine-Tuning for Visual Reasoning of Vision Language Models [42.75418134743927]
  Reason-RFT is a two-stage reinforcement fine-tuning framework for visual reasoning.<n>First,Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT) with curated CoT data activates the reasoning potential of Vision-Language Models (VLMs)<n>Second, reinforcement learning based on Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO) generates multiple reasoning-response pairs to enhance adaptability to domain shifts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-26T17:38:06Z)
• The Jumping Reasoning Curve? Tracking the Evolution of Reasoning Performance in GPT-[n] and o-[n] Models on Multimodal Puzzles [29.214813685163218]
  Release of OpenAI's o-[n] series, such as o1, o3, and o4-mini, mark a significant paradigm shift in Large Language Models.<n>We track the evolution of the GPT-[n] and o-[n] series models on challenging multimodal puzzles.<n>Our results reveal that o-[n] series, particularly later iterations like o3 and o4-mini, significantly outperform the GPT-[n] series and show strong scalability in multimodal reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-03T05:47:04Z)
• MAmmoTH-VL: Eliciting Multimodal Reasoning with Instruction Tuning at Scale [66.73529246309033]
  multimodal large language models (MLLMs) have shown significant potential in a broad range of multimodal tasks.<n>Existing instruction-tuning datasets only provide phrase-level answers without any intermediate rationales.<n>We introduce a scalable and cost-effective method to construct a large-scale multimodal instruction-tuning dataset with rich intermediate rationales.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-06T18:14:24Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.