Machine learning with minimal use of quantum computers: Provable advantages in Learning Under Quantum Privileged Information (LUQPI)

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.22006v1
• Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2026 17:14:58 GMT
• Title: Machine learning with minimal use of quantum computers: Provable advantages in Learning Under Quantum Privileged Information (LUQPI)
• Authors: Vasily Bokov, Lisa Kohl, Sebastian Schmitt, Vedran Dunjko,
• Abstract summary: A quantum computer is used only as a feature extractor.<n>We formalize this model by adapting the classical framework of Learning Under Privileged Information.<n>We show that even such minimally involved quantum feature extraction, available only during training, can yield exponential quantum-classical separations.
• Score: 3.3882078618429348
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Quantum machine learning (QML) is often listed as a promising candidate for useful applications of quantum computers, in part due to numerous proofs of possible quantum advantages. A central question is how small a role quantum computers can play while still enabling provable learning advantages over classical methods. We study an especially restricted setting in which a quantum computer is used only as a feature extractor: it acts independently on individual data points, without access to labels or global dataset information, is available only to augment the training set, and is not available at deployment. Training and deployment are therefore carried out by fully classical learners on a dataset augmented with quantum-generated features. We formalize this model by adapting the classical framework of Learning Under Privileged Information (LUPI) to the quantum case, which we call Learning Under Quantum Privileged Information (LUQPI). Within this framework, we show that even such minimally involved quantum feature extraction, available only during training, can yield exponential quantum-classical separations for suitable concept classes and data distributions under reasonable computational assumptions. We further situate LUQPI within a taxonomy of related quantum and classical learning settings and show how standard classical machinery, most notably the SVM+ algorithm, can exploit quantum-augmented data. Finally, we present numerical experiments in a physically motivated many-body setting, where privileged quantum features are expectation values of observables on ground states, and observe consistent performance gains for LUQPI-style models over strong classical baselines.

Related papers

• Efficient Learning for Linear Properties of Bounded-Gate Quantum Circuits [62.46800898243033]
  Recent progress in quantum learning theory prompts a question: can linear properties of a large-qubit circuit be efficiently learned from measurement data generated by varying classical inputs?<n>We prove that the sample complexity scaling linearly in $d$ is required to achieve a small prediction error, while the corresponding computational complexity may scale exponentially in d.<n>We propose a kernel-based method leveraging classical shadows and truncated trigonometric expansions, enabling a controllable trade-off between prediction accuracy and computational overhead.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-22T08:21:28Z)
• The curse of random quantum data [62.24825255497622]
  We quantify the performances of quantum machine learning in the landscape of quantum data. We find that the training efficiency and generalization capabilities in quantum machine learning will be exponentially suppressed with the increase in qubits. Our findings apply to both the quantum kernel method and the large-width limit of quantum neural networks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-19T12:18:07Z)
• Exponential quantum advantages in learning quantum observables from classical data [1.9662978733004604]
  We prove quantum advantages for the physically relevant task of learning quantum observables from classical data.<n>Our results shed light on the utility of quantum computers for machine learning problems in the domain of quantum many body physics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-03T11:58:43Z)
• Information-theoretic generalization bounds for learning from quantum data [5.0739329301140845]
  We propose a general mathematical formalism for describing quantum learning by training on classical-quantum data. We prove bounds on the expected generalization error of a quantum learner in terms of classical and quantum information-theoretic quantities. Our work lays a foundation for a unifying quantum information-theoretic perspective on quantum learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-09T17:21:38Z)
• Quantum data learning for quantum simulations in high-energy physics [55.41644538483948]
  We explore the applicability of quantum-data learning to practical problems in high-energy physics. We make use of ansatz based on quantum convolutional neural networks and numerically show that it is capable of recognizing quantum phases of ground states. The observation of non-trivial learning properties demonstrated in these benchmarks will motivate further exploration of the quantum-data learning architecture in high-energy physics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-29T18:00:01Z)
• Classical Verification of Quantum Learning [42.362388367152256]
  We develop a framework for classical verification of quantum learning. We propose a new quantum data access model that we call "mixture-of-superpositions" quantum examples. Our results demonstrate that the potential power of quantum data for learning tasks, while not unlimited, can be utilized by classical agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-08T00:31:27Z)
• Shadows of quantum machine learning [2.236957801565796]
  We introduce a new class of quantum models where quantum resources are only required during training, while the deployment of the trained model is classical. We prove that this class of models is universal for classically-deployed quantum machine learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-31T18:00:02Z)
• Quantum Machine Learning: from physics to software engineering [58.720142291102135]
  We show how classical machine learning approach can help improve the facilities of quantum computers. We discuss how quantum algorithms and quantum computers may be useful for solving classical machine learning tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-04T23:37:45Z)
• A didactic approach to quantum machine learning with a single qubit [68.8204255655161]
  We focus on the case of learning with a single qubit, using data re-uploading techniques. We implement the different proposed formulations in toy and real-world datasets using the qiskit quantum computing SDK.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-23T18:25:32Z)
• Recent Advances for Quantum Neural Networks in Generative Learning [98.88205308106778]
  Quantum generative learning models (QGLMs) may surpass their classical counterparts. We review the current progress of QGLMs from the perspective of machine learning. We discuss the potential applications of QGLMs in both conventional machine learning tasks and quantum physics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-07T07:32:57Z)
• Quantum Federated Learning with Quantum Data [87.49715898878858]
  Quantum machine learning (QML) has emerged as a promising field that leans on the developments in quantum computing to explore large complex machine learning problems. This paper proposes the first fully quantum federated learning framework that can operate over quantum data and, thus, share the learning of quantum circuit parameters in a decentralized manner.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-30T12:19:27Z)
• Power of data in quantum machine learning [2.1012068875084964]
  We show that some problems that are classically hard to compute can be easily predicted by classical machines learning from data. We propose a projected quantum model that provides a simple and rigorous quantum speed-up for a learning problem in the fault-tolerant regime.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-03T19:00:01Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.