Happy Young Women, Grumpy Old Men? Emotion-Driven Demographic Biases in Synthetic Face Generation

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.00032v2
• Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2026 08:10:05 GMT
• Title: Happy Young Women, Grumpy Old Men? Emotion-Driven Demographic Biases in Synthetic Face Generation
• Authors: Mengting Wei, Aditya Gulati, Guoying Zhao, Nuria Oliver,
• Abstract summary: We present a systematic audit of eight state-of-the-art text-to-image (T2I) models.<n>Using state-of-the-art facial analysis algorithms, we estimate the gender, race, age, and attractiveness levels in the generated faces.<n>Our findings reveal persistent demographic and emotion-conditioned biases in all models regardless of their country of origin.
• Score: 23.578218002193996
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Synthetic face generation has rapidly advanced with the emergence of text-to-image (T2I) and of multimodal large language models, enabling high-fidelity image production from natural-language prompts. Despite the widespread adoption of these tools, the biases, representational quality, and cross-cultural consistency of these models remain poorly understood. Prior research on biases in the synthetic generation of human faces has examined demographic biases, yet there is little research on how emotional prompts influence demographic representation and how models trained in different cultural and linguistic contexts vary in their output distributions. We present a systematic audit of eight state-of-the-art T2I models comprising four models developed by Western organizations and four developed by Chinese institutions, all prompted identically. Using state-of-the-art facial analysis algorithms, we estimate the gender, race, age, and attractiveness levels in the generated faces. To measure the deviations from global population statistics, we apply information-theoretic bias metrics including Kullback-Leibler and Jensen-Shannon divergences. Our findings reveal persistent demographic and emotion-conditioned biases in all models regardless of their country of origin. We discuss implications for fairness, socio-technical harms, governance, and the development of transparent generative systems.

Related papers

• Mitigation of Gender and Ethnicity Bias in AI-Generated Stories through Model Explanations [2.86989372262348]
  Language models have been shown to propagate social bias through their output, particularly in the representation of gender and ethnicity.<n>This paper investigates gender and ethnicity biases in AI-generated occupational stories.<n>Our proposed mitigation strategy, Bias Analysis and Mitigation through Explanation (BAME), reveals improvements in demographic representation ranging from 2% to 20%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-03T00:25:25Z)
• Blind Men and the Elephant: Diverse Perspectives on Gender Stereotypes in Benchmark Datasets [12.798832545154271]
  This paper examines the inconsistencies between intrinsic stereotype benchmarks.<n>Using StereoSet and CrowS-Pairs as case studies, we investigated how data distribution affects benchmark results.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-02T09:40:31Z)
• The Factuality Tax of Diversity-Intervened Text-to-Image Generation: Benchmark and Fact-Augmented Intervention [61.80236015147771]
  We quantify the trade-off between using diversity interventions and preserving demographic factuality in T2I models. Experiments on DoFaiR reveal that diversity-oriented instructions increase the number of different gender and racial groups. We propose Fact-Augmented Intervention (FAI) to reflect on verbalized or retrieved factual information about gender and racial compositions of generation subjects in history.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-29T09:09:42Z)
• Random Silicon Sampling: Simulating Human Sub-Population Opinion Using a Large Language Model Based on Group-Level Demographic Information [15.435605802794408]
  Large language models exhibit societal biases associated with demographic information. We propose "random silicon sampling," a method to emulate the opinions of the human population sub-group. We find that language models can generate response distributions remarkably similar to the actual U.S. public opinion polls.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-28T08:09:14Z)
• Evaluating Large Language Models through Gender and Racial Stereotypes [0.0]
  We conduct a quality comparative study and establish a framework to evaluate language models under the premise of two kinds of biases: gender and race. We find out that while gender bias has reduced immensely in newer models, as compared to older ones, racial bias still exists.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-24T18:41:16Z)
• Exposing Bias in Online Communities through Large-Scale Language Models [3.04585143845864]
  This work uses the flaw of bias in language models to explore the biases of six different online communities. The bias of the resulting models is evaluated by prompting the models with different demographics and comparing the sentiment and toxicity values of these generations. This work not only affirms how easily bias is absorbed from training data but also presents a scalable method to identify and compare the bias of different datasets or communities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-04T08:09:26Z)
• Stable Bias: Analyzing Societal Representations in Diffusion Models [72.27121528451528]
  We propose a new method for exploring the social biases in Text-to-Image (TTI) systems. Our approach relies on characterizing the variation in generated images triggered by enumerating gender and ethnicity markers in the prompts. We leverage this method to analyze images generated by 3 popular TTI systems and find that while all of their outputs show correlations with US labor demographics, they also consistently under-represent marginalized identities to different extents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-20T19:32:49Z)
• DALL-Eval: Probing the Reasoning Skills and Social Biases of Text-to-Image Generation Models [73.12069620086311]
  We investigate the visual reasoning capabilities and social biases of text-to-image models. First, we measure three visual reasoning skills: object recognition, object counting, and spatial relation understanding. Second, we assess the gender and skin tone biases by measuring the gender/skin tone distribution of generated images.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-08T18:36:52Z)
• Are Commercial Face Detection Models as Biased as Academic Models? [64.71318433419636]
  We compare academic and commercial face detection systems, specifically examining robustness to noise. We find that state-of-the-art academic face detection models exhibit demographic disparities in their noise robustness. We conclude that commercial models are always as biased or more biased than an academic model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-25T02:21:42Z)
• Towards Understanding and Mitigating Social Biases in Language Models [107.82654101403264]
  Large-scale pretrained language models (LMs) can be potentially dangerous in manifesting undesirable representational biases. We propose steps towards mitigating social biases during text generation. Our empirical results and human evaluation demonstrate effectiveness in mitigating bias while retaining crucial contextual information.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-24T17:52:43Z)
• Investigating Bias in Deep Face Analysis: The KANFace Dataset and Empirical Study [67.3961439193994]
  We introduce the most comprehensive, large-scale dataset of facial images and videos to date. The data are manually annotated in terms of identity, exact age, gender and kinship. A method to debias network embeddings is introduced and tested on the proposed benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-15T00:14:39Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.