Structured Self-Consistency:A Multi-Task Evaluation of LLMs on VirtualHome
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.00611v2
- Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2026 09:15:21 GMT
- Title: Structured Self-Consistency:A Multi-Task Evaluation of LLMs on VirtualHome
- Abstract summary: Embodied AI requires agents to understand goals, plan actions, and execute tasks in simulated environments.<n>We present a comprehensive evaluation of Large Language Models (LLMs) on the VirtualHome benchmark using the Embodied Agent Interface (EAI) framework.
- Score: 17.912331507214052
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Embodied AI requires agents to understand goals, plan actions, and execute tasks in simulated environments. We present a comprehensive evaluation of Large Language Models (LLMs) on the VirtualHome benchmark using the Embodied Agent Interface (EAI) framework. We compare two representative 7B-parameter models OPENPANGU-7B and QWEN2.5-7B across four fundamental tasks: Goal Interpretation, Action Sequencing, Subgoal Decomposition, and Transition Modeling. We propose Structured Self-Consistency (SSC), an enhanced decoding strategy that leverages multiple sampling with domain-specific voting mechanisms to improve output quality for structured generation tasks. Experimental results demonstrate that SSC significantly enhances performance, with OPENPANGU-7B excelling at hierarchical planning while QWEN2.5-7B show advantages in action-level tasks. Our analysis reveals complementary strengths across model types, providing insights for future embodied AI system development.
Related papers
- HAAS Studio: A Tool for Simulating, Benchmarking, and Governing Human-AI Work Allocation [0.0]
HAAS Studio is a simulation and decision-support tool for policy-aware adaptive task allocation between humans and AI systems.<n>Three domain packs are included: software engineering, manufacturing, and healthcare.<n>The release includes 16 company profiles and six governance benchmark suites.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-18T22:07:02Z) - RoboAgent: Chaining Basic Capabilities for Embodied Task Planning [46.248451288196435]
This paper focuses on embodied task planning, where an agent acquires visual observations from the environment and executes atomic actions to accomplish a given task.<n>We propose RoboAgent, a capability-driven planning pipeline in which the model actively invokes different sub-capabilities.<n>We use a multi-stage paradigm that consists of: (1) behavior cloning with expert plans, (2) DAgger training using trajectories collected by the model, and (3) reinforcement learning guided by an expert policy.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-04-09T04:01:27Z) - VAGEN: Reinforcing World Model Reasoning for Multi-Turn VLM Agents [130.70999337445468]
Key challenge in training Vision-Language Model (VLM) agents, compared to Language Model (LLM) agents, is shift from textual states to complex visual observations.<n>We ask: Can VLM agents construct internal world models through explicit visual state reasoning?<n>We architecturally enforce and reward the agent's reasoning process via reinforcement learning (RL)<n>We find that the agent's reasoning into State Estimation and Transition Modeling is critical for success.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-19T16:05:07Z) - Learning Active Perception via Self-Evolving Preference Optimization for GUI Grounding [31.57375084036447]
Vision Language Models (VLMs) have recently achieved significant progress in bridging visual perception and linguistic reasoning.<n>We propose LASER, a self-evolving framework that progressively endows VLMs with multi-step perception capabilities.<n>Our approach integrates Monte Carlo quality estimation with Intersection-over-Union (IoU)-based region quality evaluation to jointly encourage both accuracy and diversity in constructing high-quality preference data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-09-04T14:17:01Z) - RoboCerebra: A Large-scale Benchmark for Long-horizon Robotic Manipulation Evaluation [59.9896841079005]
We introduce RoboCerebra, a benchmark for evaluating high-level reasoning in long-horizon robotic manipulation.<n>The dataset is constructed via a top-down pipeline, where GPT generates task instructions and decomposes them into subtask sequences.<n>Compared to prior benchmarks, RoboCerebra features significantly longer action sequences and denser annotations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-07T06:15:49Z) - CLaC at SemEval-2025 Task 6: A Multi-Architecture Approach for Corporate Environmental Promise Verification [0.20482269513546458]
This paper presents our approach to the SemEval-2025 Task6 (PromiseEval), which focuses on verifying promises in corporate ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) reports.<n>We explore three model architectures to address the four subtasks of promise identification, supporting evidence assessment, clarity evaluation, and verification timing.<n>Our work highlights the effectiveness of linguistic feature extraction, attention pooling, and multi-objective learning in promise verification tasks, despite challenges posed by class imbalance and limited training data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-29T15:19:00Z) - Benchmarking Vision, Language, & Action Models in Procedurally Generated, Open Ended Action Environments [20.93006455952299]
Vision-language-action (VLA) models represent an important step toward general-purpose robotic systems.<n>We introduce MultiNet v0.2, a benchmark designed to evaluate and analyze the generalization performance of state-of-the-art VLMs andVLAs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-08T16:51:36Z) - VisualPRM: An Effective Process Reward Model for Multimodal Reasoning [76.35753243272521]
We introduce VisualPRM, which improves the reasoning abilities of existing Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs)<n>Our model achieves a 5.9-point improvement across seven multimodal reasoning benchmarks.<n>For the evaluation of multimodal PRMs, we propose VisualProcessBench, a benchmark with human-annotated step-wise correctness labels.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-13T12:03:37Z) - LLaVE: Large Language and Vision Embedding Models with Hardness-Weighted Contrastive Learning [76.82159851648711]
We propose a framework that dynamically improves the embedding model's representation learning for negative pairs.<n>LLaVE establishes stronger baselines that achieve state-of-the-art (SOTA) performance.<n>LLaVE can generalize to text-video retrieval tasks in a zero-shot manner and achieve strong performance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-04T10:21:57Z) - Automatic Evaluation for Text-to-image Generation: Task-decomposed Framework, Distilled Training, and Meta-evaluation Benchmark [62.58869921806019]
We propose a task decomposition evaluation framework based on GPT-4o to automatically construct a new training dataset.
We design innovative training strategies to effectively distill GPT-4o's evaluation capabilities into a 7B open-source MLLM, MiniCPM-V-2.6.
Experimental results demonstrate that our distilled open-source MLLM significantly outperforms the current state-of-the-art GPT-4o-base baseline.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-11-23T08:06:06Z) - TestAgent: Automatic Benchmarking and Exploratory Interaction for Evaluating LLMs in Vertical Domains [19.492393243160244]
Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed in highly specialized vertical domains.<n>Existing evaluations for vertical domains typically rely on the labor-intensive construction of static single-turn datasets.<n>We propose TestAgent, a framework for automatic benchmarking and exploratory dynamic evaluation in vertical domains.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-15T11:20:42Z) - Fine-Tuning Large Vision-Language Models as Decision-Making Agents via Reinforcement Learning [79.38140606606126]
We propose an algorithmic framework that fine-tunes vision-language models (VLMs) with reinforcement learning (RL)
Our framework provides a task description and then prompts the VLM to generate chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning.
We demonstrate that our proposed framework enhances the decision-making capabilities of VLM agents across various tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-16T17:50:19Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.