HAAS Studio: A Tool for Simulating, Benchmarking, and Governing Human-AI Work Allocation

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.20596v1
• Date: Mon, 18 May 2026 22:07:02 GMT
• Title: HAAS Studio: A Tool for Simulating, Benchmarking, and Governing Human-AI Work Allocation
• Abstract summary: HAAS Studio is a simulation and decision-support tool for policy-aware adaptive task allocation between humans and AI systems.<n>Three domain packs are included: software engineering, manufacturing, and healthcare.<n>The release includes 16 company profiles and six governance benchmark suites.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: We present HAAS Studio, a simulation and decision-support tool for policy-aware adaptive task allocation between humans and AI systems. HAAS Studio turns the HAAS framework into an interactive environment for asking a practical deployment question: before introducing AI into a workflow, how can a team compare allocation strategies, inspect governance tradeoffs, and derive a defensible task-level operating model? The tool combines a five-dimensional cognitive representation of subtasks, a five-mode collaboration spectrum, adaptive allocation with multi-armed bandits (UCB1, Discounted UCB, LinUCB, and Thompson Sampling), oracle counterfactual regret analysis, contract-based governance with four independent guards, and a multi-criteria decision-support layer that separates efficient strategies from deployable options. It also models human-AI coevolution across six layers, monitors deskilling risk through sliding-window exposure metrics and benchmark runners, and supports persistent worker modeling through Live Twin and Planning modules. Three domain packs are included: software engineering, manufacturing, and healthcare. Each provides a task catalog, worker profiles, and KPI vocabulary, while the architecture allows new domains to be added without modifying the simulation core. The release includes 16 company profiles and six governance benchmark suites. This paper focuses on the tool, including its modeling assumptions, layered architecture, interaction workflow, built-in evidence assets, task-oriented recipes, case-study protocols, and a compact reproducible demonstration snapshot. A decision-guidance layer translates benchmark outputs into deployment decisions through structured patterns, heuristics, and a decision matrix.

Related papers

• DuMateBench: Evaluating Autonomous Agents in Complex Real-World Workflows [69.12339622053588]
  We introduce DuMateBench, a real-session benchmark reconstructed from anonymized and privacy-screened user sessions.<n>The resulting benchmark comprises 200 tasks spanning 8 broad scenarios and 17 fine-grained capability categories.<n>We execute these tasks in isolated Docker containers injected with three forms of real-world environmental complexity: Insufficient, Unstable, and Noisy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-27T02:36:23Z)
• From Question Answering to Task Completion: A Survey on Agent System and Harness Design [67.8241530947325]
  This survey examines LLM-based agents through a model-harness lens.<n>We first clarify the functional definition of agents and the implementation view of an LLM-based agent as a foundation model and an execution harness.<n>We then analyze the limits of model-centric scaling, trace four paradigms of agent engineering, and decompose the execution harness into six coupled runtime responsibilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-14T05:40:16Z)
• Small Model as Master Orchestrator: Learning Unified Agent-Tool Orchestration with Parallel Subtask Decomposition [61.291733522717415]
  Agent-as-Tool is a unified parallel orchestration paradigm that mitigates both agents and tools into a standardized, learnable action space.<n>ParaManager decouples planning decisions from subtask solving, enabling state-aware parallel subtask decomposition, delegation, and asynchronous execution.<n>Experiments show that ParaManager achieves strong performance across multiple benchmarks and exhibits robust generalization under unseen model pools.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-18T14:41:27Z)
• RoboAgent: Chaining Basic Capabilities for Embodied Task Planning [46.248451288196435]
  This paper focuses on embodied task planning, where an agent acquires visual observations from the environment and executes atomic actions to accomplish a given task.<n>We propose RoboAgent, a capability-driven planning pipeline in which the model actively invokes different sub-capabilities.<n>We use a multi-stage paradigm that consists of: (1) behavior cloning with expert plans, (2) DAgger training using trajectories collected by the model, and (3) reinforcement learning guided by an expert policy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-09T04:01:27Z)
• The Evolution of Tool Use in LLM Agents: From Single-Tool Call to Multi-Tool Orchestration [58.61149924275458]
  Tool use enables large language models to access external information, invoke software systems, and act in digital environments beyond what can be solved from model parameters alone.<n>As agent systems evolve, the central problem has shifted from isolated invocation to multi-tool orchestration over long trajectories with intermediate state, execution feedback, changing environments, and practical constraints such as safety, cost, and verifiability.<n>We organize the literature around six core dimensions: inference-time planning and execution, training and trajectory construction, safety and control, efficiency under resource constraints, capability completeness in open environments, and benchmark design and evaluation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-24T07:05:05Z)
• Agyn: A Multi-Agent System for Team-Based Autonomous Software Engineering [0.09046463333989574]
  Real-world software development is organized as a collaborative activity carried out by teams following shared methodologies.<n>We present a fully automated multi-agent system that explicitly models software engineering as an organizational process.<n>Our results suggest that replicating team structure, methodology, and communication is a powerful paradigm for autonomous software engineering.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-01T22:17:19Z)
• Structured Self-Consistency:A Multi-Task Evaluation of LLMs on VirtualHome [17.912331507214052]
  Embodied AI requires agents to understand goals, plan actions, and execute tasks in simulated environments.<n>We present a comprehensive evaluation of Large Language Models (LLMs) on the VirtualHome benchmark using the Embodied Agent Interface (EAI) framework.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-31T08:56:43Z)
• Agentic Workflow for Education: Concepts and Applications [7.875055566698523]
  This study introduces the Agentic for Education (AWE), a four-component model comprising self-reflection, tool invocation, task planning, and multi-agent collaboration.<n>AWE offers a promising path toward reducing teacher workload, enhancing instructional quality, and enabling broader educational innovation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-01T14:39:48Z)
• Rethinking Testing for LLM Applications: Characteristics, Challenges, and a Lightweight Interaction Protocol [83.83217247686402]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have evolved from simple text generators into complex software systems that integrate retrieval augmentation, tool invocation, and multi-turn interactions.<n>Their inherent non-determinism, dynamism, and context dependence pose fundamental challenges for quality assurance.<n>This paper decomposes LLM applications into a three-layer architecture: textbftextitSystem Shell Layer, textbftextitPrompt Orchestration Layer, and textbftextitLLM Inference Core.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-28T13:00:28Z)
• HEAS: Hierarchical Evolutionary Agent Simulation Framework for Cross-Scale Modeling and Multi-Objective Search [4.807104001943257]
  Hierarchical Simulation Agent (HEAS) is a Python framework that unifies layered agent-based modeling with evolutionary optimization and tournament evaluation.<n>HEAS represents models as hierarchies of lightweight processes ("streams") scheduled in deterministic layers that read and write a shared context.<n> compact API and CLI-simulate, optimize, evaluate-expose single- and multi-objective evolution.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-21T13:35:46Z)
• Boosting Virtual Agent Learning and Reasoning: A Step-Wise, Multi-Dimensional, and Generalist Reward Model with Benchmark [72.46357004059661]
  Generalist Virtual Agents (GVAs) have shown significant promise in autonomous task execution.<n>To address these challenges, we propose Similar, a Step-Wise Multi-Dimensional Generalist Reward Model.<n>Similar offers fine-grained signals for agent training and can choose better action for inference-time scaling.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-24T13:30:47Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.