Good SFT Optimizes for SFT, Better SFT Prepares for Reinforcement Learning

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.01058v1
• Date: Sun, 01 Feb 2026 06:53:45 GMT
• Title: Good SFT Optimizes for SFT, Better SFT Prepares for Reinforcement Learning
• Authors: Dylan Zhang, Yufeng Xu, Haojin Wang, Qingzhi Chen, Hao Peng,
• Abstract summary: Post-training of reasoning LLMs typically consists of an offline SFT stage followed by an online reinforcement learning stage.<n>We show that, after identical RL training, models from stronger SFT checkpoints can significantly underperform those from weaker ones.<n>We propose PEAR, an SFT-stage method that corrects this mismatch and better prepares the model for RL.
• Score: 8.550698116833123
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Post-training of reasoning LLMs is a holistic process that typically consists of an offline SFT stage followed by an online reinforcement learning (RL) stage. However, SFT is often optimized in isolation to maximize SFT performance alone. We show that, after identical RL training, models initialized from stronger SFT checkpoints can significantly underperform those initialized from weaker ones. We attribute this to a mismatch typical in current SFT-RL pipelines: the distribution that generates the offline SFT data can differ substantially from the policy optimized during online RL, which learns from its own rollouts. We propose PEAR (Policy Evaluation-inspired Algorithm for Offline Learning Loss Re-weighting), an SFT-stage method that corrects this mismatch and better prepares the model for RL. PEAR uses importance sampling to reweight the SFT loss, with three variants operating at the token, block, and sequence levels. It can be used to augment standard SFT objectives and incurs little additional training overhead once probabilities for the offline data are collected. We conduct controlled experiments on verifiable reasoning games and mathematical reasoning tasks on Qwen 2.5 and 3 and DeepSeek-distilled models. PEAR consistently improves post-RL performance over canonical SFT, with pass at 8 gains up to a 14.6 percent on AIME2025. Our results suggest that PEAR is an effective step toward more holistic LLM post-training by designing and evaluating SFT with downstream RL in mind rather than in isolation.

Related papers

• SED-SFT: Selectively Encouraging Diversity in Supervised Fine-Tuning [54.393763477932474]
  Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT) followed by Reinforcement Learning (RL) has emerged as the standard post-training paradigm for large language models (LLMs)<n>We propose SED-SFT, which adaptively encourages diversity based on the token exploration space.<n>This framework introduces a selective entropy regularization term with a selective masking mechanism into the optimization objective.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-07T09:39:21Z)
• On the Non-decoupling of Supervised Fine-tuning and Reinforcement Learning in Post-training [10.433802085981046]
  Post-training of large language models routinely interleaves supervised fine-tuning (SFT) with reinforcement learning (RL)<n>We show that RL increases SFT loss under SFT optimality and that SFT lowers the reward achieved by RL.<n> Experiments on Qwen3-0.6B confirm the predicted degradation, verifying that SFT and RL cannot be separated without loss of prior performance in the post-training.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-12T10:14:09Z)
• Trust-Region Adaptive Policy Optimization [82.09255251747818]
  Post-training methods play an important role in improving large language models' (LLMs) complex reasoning abilities.<n>We introduce TRAPO, a framework that interleavesSupervised Fine-Tuning (SFT) and Reinforcement Learning (RL) within each training instance.<n>Experiments on five mathematical reasoning benchmarks show that TRAPO consistently surpasses standard SFT, RL, and SFT-then-RL pipelines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-19T14:37:07Z)
• Reassessing the Role of Supervised Fine-Tuning: An Empirical Study in VLM Reasoning [30.751908700207185]
  SFT plays a crucial role across several scenarios.<n>SFT with only 2K achieves comparable or better reasoning performance to RL with 20K.<n>We identify a pervasive issue of deceptive rewards, where higher rewards fail to correlate with better reasoning accuracy in RL.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-14T13:46:42Z)
• Rethinking Expert Trajectory Utilization in LLM Post-training [35.018182540417236]
  We propose the Plasticity-Ceiling Framework to ground this landscape.<n>We establish the Sequential SFT-then-RL pipeline as the superior standard.<n>Our findings provide actionable guidelines for maximizing the value extracted from expert trajectories.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-12T11:13:00Z)
• Mitigating Forgetting Between Supervised and Reinforcement Learning Yields Stronger Reasoners [28.039145840787683]
  Supervised fine-tuning (SFT) offers complementary benefits but typically requires large-scale data and risks overfitting.<n>Recent attempts to combine SFT and RL face three main challenges: data inefficiency, algorithm-specific designs, and catastrophic forgetting.<n>We propose a plug-and-play framework that dynamically integrates SFT into RL by selecting challenging examples for SFT.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-06T03:01:14Z)
• Quagmires in SFT-RL Post-Training: When High SFT Scores Mislead and What to Use Instead [20.446287312285648]
  We study whether high SFT scores translate to improved performance after RL.<n>We find high SFT scores can be biased toward simpler or more homogeneous data and are not reliably predictive of subsequent RL gains or scaled-up post-training effectiveness.<n>We study alternative metrics and identify generalization loss on held-out reasoning examples and Pass@large k performance to provide strong proxies for the RL outcome.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-02T02:57:00Z)
• Why Reinforcement Fine-Tuning Enables MLLMs Preserve Prior Knowledge Better: A Data Perspective [98.45690529036848]
  Post-training algorithms such as Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT) and Reinforcement Fine-Tuning (RFT) are widely used to adapt multimodal large language models to downstream tasks.<n>While effective at task adaptation, their impact on prior knowledge remains unclear.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-30T04:15:01Z)
• AceReason-Nemotron 1.1: Advancing Math and Code Reasoning through SFT and RL Synergy [48.30596996677882]
  We investigate the synergy between supervised fine-tuning (SFT) and reinforcement learning (RL) in developing strong reasoning models.<n> scaling strategies yield notable improvements in reasoning performance.<n>Our AceReason-Nemotron-1.1 7B model significantly outperforms AceReason-Nemotron-1.0 and new state-of-the-art performance among Qwen2.5-7B-based reasoning models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-16T09:27:48Z)
• Implicit Reward as the Bridge: A Unified View of SFT and DPO Connections [65.36449542323277]
  We present a unified theoretical framework bridgingSupervised Fine-Tuning (SFT) and preference learning in Large Language Model (LLM) post-training.<n>We propose a simple yet effective learning rate reduction approach that yields significant performance improvements.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-15T05:42:29Z)
• Bridging Supervised Learning and Reinforcement Learning in Math Reasoning [55.889740979706815]
  Reinforcement Learning (RL) has played a central role in the recent surge of math abilities by enabling self-improvement through binary verifier signals.<n>In this work, we propose Negative-aware Fine-Tuning (NFT) -- a supervised approach that enables LLMs to reflect on their failures and improve autonomously with no external teachers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-23T17:17:40Z)
• Understanding Forgetting in LLM Supervised Fine-Tuning and Preference Learning - A Convex Optimization Perspective [55.66517396157806]
  The widely adopted approach in post-training popular open-source LLMs is to sequentially perform SFT and RLHF/DPO.<n>This is suboptimal in terms of SFT and RLHF/DPO trade-off.<n>We propose a practical joint post-training framework which has theoretical convergence guarantees and empirically outperforms sequential post-training framework.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-20T19:38:41Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.