Does Ad-Free Mean Less Data Collection? An Empirical Study of Platform Data Practices and User Expectations

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.01231v1
• Date: Sun, 01 Feb 2026 13:46:04 GMT
• Title: Does Ad-Free Mean Less Data Collection? An Empirical Study of Platform Data Practices and User Expectations
• Abstract summary: We investigate the alignment between platform data collection practices and related user expectations.<n>Our survey reveals that 69% of the participants normatively expect data collection to be reduced.<n>Our findings indicate a significant disconnect between data practices and user expectations.
• Score: 6.986930655208371
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Online platforms increasingly offer "paid" ad-free subscriptions as an alternative to the traditional "free" ad-based model. The transition to ad-free models ostensibly removes advertising as a key justification for data processing under the GDPR. So, normatively, platforms should collect less user data. However, platforms may justify continued data collection as a means to provide an improved, personalized experience. This tension between privacy principles and platform incentives raises a critical underexplored question: do data collection practices vary between ad-free and ad-based subscription models? In this paper, we shed light on this important privacy issue by investigating the alignment between platform data collection practices and related user expectations. With respect to data collection process, our analyses of data exports from three major online platforms - Instagram, Facebook, and X - reveal that these platforms continue to retain or collect some ad-related data, even in ad-free subscriptions. With respect to user expectations, our survey among 255 participants on Prolific reveals that 69% of the participants normatively expect data collection to be reduced, indicating their expectation of improved digital privacy in an ad-free model. However, when asked what they think actually happens, 63% of these participants believed that platforms would still collect about the same amount of data, highlighting skepticism about platform practices. Our findings not only indicate a significant disconnect between data practices and normative user expectations, but also raise serious questions about platform compliance with core GDPR principles, such as purpose limitation, data minimization, and transparency.

Related papers

• Insights from an experiment crowdsourcing data from thousands of US Amazon users: The importance of transparency, money, and data use [6.794366017852433]
  This paper shares an innovative approach to crowdsourcing user data to collect otherwise inaccessible Amazon purchase histories, spanning 5 years, from more than 5000 US users. We developed a data collection tool that prioritizes participant consent and includes an experimental study design. Experiment results (N=6325) reveal both monetary incentives and transparency can significantly increase data sharing.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-19T20:45:19Z)
• Data Acquisition: A New Frontier in Data-centric AI [65.90972015426274]
  We first present an investigation of current data marketplaces, revealing lack of platforms offering detailed information about datasets. We then introduce the DAM challenge, a benchmark to model the interaction between the data providers and acquirers. Our evaluation of the submitted strategies underlines the need for effective data acquisition strategies in Machine Learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-22T22:15:17Z)
• Protecting User Privacy in Online Settings via Supervised Learning [69.38374877559423]
  We design an intelligent approach to online privacy protection that leverages supervised learning. By detecting and blocking data collection that might infringe on a user's privacy, we can restore a degree of digital privacy to the user.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-06T05:20:16Z)
• Membership Inference Attacks against Synthetic Data through Overfitting Detection [84.02632160692995]
  We argue for a realistic MIA setting that assumes the attacker has some knowledge of the underlying data distribution. We propose DOMIAS, a density-based MIA model that aims to infer membership by targeting local overfitting of the generative model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-24T11:27:39Z)
• Towards a User Privacy-Aware Mobile Gaming App Installation Prediction Model [0.8602553195689513]
  We investigate the process of predicting a mobile gaming app installation from the point of view of a demand-side platform. We explore the trade-off between privacy preservation and model performance. We conclude that privacy-aware models might still preserve significant capabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-07T09:14:59Z)
• The Fair Value of Data Under Heterogeneous Privacy Constraints in Federated Learning [26.53734856637336]
  This paper puts forth an idea for a textitfair amount to compensate users for their data at a given privacy level based on an axiomatic definition of fairness. We also formulate a heterogeneous federated learning problem for the platform with privacy level options for users.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-30T23:51:03Z)
• Position: Considerations for Differentially Private Learning with Large-Scale Public Pretraining [75.25943383604266]
  We question whether the use of large Web-scraped datasets should be viewed as differential-privacy-preserving. We caution that publicizing these models pretrained on Web data as "private" could lead to harm and erode the public's trust in differential privacy as a meaningful definition of privacy. We conclude by discussing potential paths forward for the field of private learning, as public pretraining becomes more popular and powerful.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-13T10:41:12Z)
• Lessons from the AdKDD'21 Privacy-Preserving ML Challenge [57.365745458033075]
  A prominent proposal at W3C only allows sharing advertising signals through aggregated, differentially private reports of past displays. To study this proposal extensively, an open Privacy-Preserving Machine Learning Challenge took place at AdKDD'21. A key finding is that learning models on large, aggregated data in the presence of a small set of unaggregated data points can be surprisingly efficient and cheap.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-31T11:09:59Z)
• Challenges and approaches to privacy preserving post-click conversion prediction [3.4071263815701336]
  We provide an overview of the challenges and constraints when learning conversion models in this setting. We introduce a novel approach for training these models that makes use of post-ranking signals. We show using offline experiments on real world data that it outperforms a model relying on opt-in data alone.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-29T21:36:01Z)
• Measuring Lay Reactions to Personal Data Markets [0.0]
  This study investigates whether market transactions in a typical online scenario are accepted when evaluated by lay people. Results show that a high percentage of study participants refused to participate in a data pricing exercise. Results also point to a conceptual mismatch between cultural and legal expectations regarding the use of personal data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-21T20:56:19Z)
• Explainable Patterns: Going from Findings to Insights to Support Data Analytics Democratization [60.18814584837969]
  We present Explainable Patterns (ExPatt), a new framework to support lay users in exploring and creating data storytellings. ExPatt automatically generates plausible explanations for observed or selected findings using an external (textual) source of information.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-19T16:13:44Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.