"If You're Very Clever, No One Knows You've Used It": The Social Dynamics of Developing Generative AI Literacy in the Workplace
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.01386v1
- Date: Sun, 01 Feb 2026 18:41:30 GMT
- Title: "If You're Very Clever, No One Knows You've Used It": The Social Dynamics of Developing Generative AI Literacy in the Workplace
- Authors: Qing, Xia, Marios Constantinides, Advait Sarkar, Duncan Brumby, Anna Cox,
- Abstract summary: We conducted in-depth interviews with 19 knowledge workers across multiple sectors to examine how they develop GenAI competencies.<n>We found that, while knowledge sharing from colleagues supported learning, the ability to remove cues indicating GenAI use was perceived as validation of domain expertise.<n>These behaviours ultimately reduced opportunities for learning via knowledge sharing and undermined transparency.
- Score: 16.792964152066638
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Generative AI (GenAI) tools are rapidly transforming knowledge work, making AI literacy a critical priority for organizations. However, research on AI literacy lacks empirical insight into how knowledge workers' beliefs around GenAI literacy are shaped by the social dynamics of the workplace, and how workers learn to apply GenAI tools in these environments. To address this gap, we conducted in-depth interviews with 19 knowledge workers across multiple sectors to examine how they develop GenAI competencies in real-world professional contexts. We found that, while knowledge sharing from colleagues supported learning, the ability to remove cues indicating GenAI use was perceived as validation of domain expertise. These behaviours ultimately reduced opportunities for learning via knowledge sharing and undermined transparency. To advance workplace AI literacy, we argue for fostering open dialogue, increasing visibility of user-generated knowledge, and greater emphasis on the benefits of collaborative learning for navigating rapid technological developments.
Related papers
- Generative AI in Saudi Arabia: A National Survey of Adoption, Risks, and Public Perceptions [0.6010778467667774]
Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) is rapidly becoming embedded in Saudi Arabia's digital transformation under Vision 2030.<n>This study provides an early snapshot of GenAI engagement among Saudi nationals.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-26T07:40:41Z) - Examining the Usage of Generative AI Models in Student Learning Activities for Software Programming [3.2383459424229835]
This study investigates how GenAI assistance compares to conventional online resources in supporting knowledge gains across different proficiency levels.<n>We conducted a controlled user experiment with 24 undergraduate students of two different levels of programming experience.<n>Our findings reveal that generating complete solutions with GenAI significantly improves task performance, especially for beginners, but does not consistently result in knowledge gains.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-11-17T11:42:24Z) - A Community-driven vision for a new Knowledge Resource for AI [54.6699845861346]
Despite the success of knowledge resources like WordNet, verifiable, general-purpose widely available sources of knowledge remain a critical deficiency in AI infrastructure.<n>This paper synthesizes our findings and outlines a community-driven vision for a new knowledge infrastructure.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-19T20:51:28Z) - "We need to avail ourselves of GenAI to enhance knowledge distribution": Empowering Older Adults through GenAI Literacy [0.49157446832511503]
Older adults often exhibit greater reservations about adopting emerging technologies.<n>This study examines strategies for delivering GenAI literacy to older adults.<n> Quantitative data indicated a trend toward improved AI literacy, though the results were not statistically significant.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-06T16:38:37Z) - Reflection on Data Storytelling Tools in the Generative AI Era from the Human-AI Collaboration Perspective [54.152639172274]
Large-scale generative AI techniques have the potential to enhance data storytelling with their power in visual and narration generation.<n>We compare the collaboration patterns of the latest tools with those of earlier ones using a dedicated framework for understanding human-AI collaboration in data storytelling.<n>The benefits of these AI techniques and implications to human-AI collaboration are also revealed.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-04T13:56:18Z) - Lessons for GenAI Literacy From a Field Study of Human-GenAI Augmentation in the Workplace [0.11704154007740832]
This study compares the use of GenAI across three different functions - product development, software engineering, and digital content creation.<n>Findings show a wide variance in the use of GenAI and in the level of computing knowledge of users.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-01T21:26:31Z) - Generative AI Literacy: Twelve Defining Competencies [48.90506360377104]
This paper introduces a competency-based model for generative artificial intelligence (AI) literacy covering essential skills and knowledge areas necessary to interact with generative AI.<n>The competencies range from foundational AI literacy to prompt engineering and programming skills, including ethical and legal considerations.<n>These twelve competencies offer a framework for individuals, policymakers, government officials, and educators looking to navigate and take advantage of the potential of generative AI responsibly.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-11-29T14:55:15Z) - Not a Swiss Army Knife: Academics' Perceptions of Trade-Offs Around Generative Artificial Intelligence Use [12.85888736626468]
We interviewed 17 knowledge workers, including faculty and students, to investigate the social and technical dimensions of generative AI (Gen AI)<n>Our participants raised concerns about the opacity of the data used to train Gen AI.<n>Participants recognized Gen AI's potential to democratize knowledge by accelerating the learning process and act as an accessible research assistant.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-02T04:25:35Z) - Beyond Factuality: A Comprehensive Evaluation of Large Language Models
as Knowledge Generators [78.63553017938911]
Large language models (LLMs) outperform information retrieval techniques for downstream knowledge-intensive tasks.
However, community concerns abound regarding the factuality and potential implications of using this uncensored knowledge.
We introduce CONNER, designed to evaluate generated knowledge from six important perspectives.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-11T08:22:37Z) - AutoML in The Wild: Obstacles, Workarounds, and Expectations [37.813441975457735]
This study focuses on understanding the limitations of AutoML encountered by users in their real-world practices.
Our findings reveal that users actively exercise user agency to overcome three major challenges arising from customizability, transparency, and privacy.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-02-21T17:06:46Z) - Towards Human Cognition Level-based Experiment Design for Counterfactual
Explanations (XAI) [68.8204255655161]
The emphasis of XAI research appears to have turned to a more pragmatic explanation approach for better understanding.
An extensive area where cognitive science research may substantially influence XAI advancements is evaluating user knowledge and feedback.
We propose a framework to experiment with generating and evaluating the explanations on the grounds of different cognitive levels of understanding.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-10-31T19:20:22Z) - From Psychological Curiosity to Artificial Curiosity: Curiosity-Driven
Learning in Artificial Intelligence Tasks [56.20123080771364]
Psychological curiosity plays a significant role in human intelligence to enhance learning through exploration and information acquisition.
In the Artificial Intelligence (AI) community, artificial curiosity provides a natural intrinsic motivation for efficient learning.
CDL has become increasingly popular, where agents are self-motivated to learn novel knowledge.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-01-20T17:07:03Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.