Mapping a Decade of Avian Influenza Research (2014-2023): A Scientometric Analysis from Web of Science

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.01712v1
• Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2026 06:37:20 GMT
• Title: Mapping a Decade of Avian Influenza Research (2014-2023): A Scientometric Analysis from Web of Science
• Authors: Muneer Ahmad, Undie Felicia Nkatv, Amrita Sharma, Gorrety Maria Juma, Nicholas Kamoga, Julirine Nakanwag,
• Abstract summary: This study analyzes Avian Influenza research from 2014 to 2023 using data from the Web of Science database.<n>Results reveal a steady increase in publications, with high contributions from Chinese and American institutions.<n>China and the USA lead in publication volume, though developed nations like the United Kingdom and Germany exhibit a higher rate of international collaboration.
• Score: 0.22166578153935787
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: This scientometric study analyzes Avian Influenza research from 2014 to 2023 using bibliographic data from the Web of Science database. We examined publication trends, sources, authorship, collaborative networks, document types, and geographical distribution to gain insights into the global research landscape. Results reveal a steady increase in publications, with high contributions from Chinese and American institutions. Journals such as PLoS One and the Journal of Virology published the highest number of studies, indicating their influence in this field. The most prolific institutions include the Chinese Academy of Sciences and the University of Hong Kong, while the College of Veterinary Medicine at South China Agricultural University emerged as the most productive department. China and the USA lead in publication volume, though developed nations like the United Kingdom and Germany exhibit a higher rate of international collaboration. "Articles" are the most common document type, constituting 84.6% of the total, while "Reviews" account for 7.6%. This study provides a comprehensive view of global trends in Avian Influenza research, emphasizing the need for collaborative efforts across borders.

Related papers

• Global research trends and collaborations in Fibrodysplasia Ossificans Progressiva: A bibliometric analysis (1989-2023) [0.27528170226206433]
  Fibrodysplasia Ossificans Progressiva (FOP) is a rare and debilitating genetic disorder.<n>This scientometric analysis examines the global research trends on FOP between 1989 and 2023 using data from Web of Science.<n>The study highlights key patterns in publication productivity, influential journals, institutions, and the geographical distribution of research.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-07T06:17:04Z)
• Mapping Research Productivity of BRICS Countries with Special Reference to Coronary Artery Disease (CAD): A Scientometric Study [0.3655021726150367]
  This study presents a comprehensive scientometric analysis of research productivity on Coronary Artery Disease (CAD) among the BRICS countries, Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa.<n>A total of 50,036 records were analyzed to assess publication growth trends, authorship patterns, collaboration levels, and citation impact.<n>The findings reveal a steady increase in CAD-related publications, with China emerging as the leading contributor, followed by Brazil, Russia, India, and South Africa.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-07T12:59:36Z)
• Two Decades of Research at the University of Lagos (2004-2023): A Scientometric Analysis of Productivity, Collaboration, and Impact [0.3093890460224435]
  We examine trends in publication volume, collaboration patterns, citation impact, and the most prolific authors, departments, and research domains at the university.<n>The study reveals a consistent increase in research productivity, with the highest publication output recorded in 2023.<n>Health Sciences, Engineering, and Social Sciences are identified as dominant fields, reflecting the university's interdisciplinary research strengths.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-06T05:26:17Z)
• Measuring the Research Output and Performance of the University of Ibadan from 2014 to 2023: A Scientometric Analysis [0.3093890460224435]
  This study employs scientometric methods to assess the research output and performance of the University of Ibadan from 2014 to 2023.<n>The study focuses on the departments that contribute the most, the best journals for publishing, the nations that collaborate, the impact of citations both locally and globally, well-known authors and their total production, and the research output broken down by year.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-29T08:39:36Z)
• The Role of Computing Resources in Publishing Foundation Model Research [84.20094600030092]
  We evaluate the relationship between these resources and the scientific advancement of foundation models (FM)<n>We reviewed 6517 FM papers published between 2022 to 2024, and surveyed 229 first-authors to the impact of computing resources on scientific output.<n>We find that increased computing is correlated with national funding allocations and citations, but our findings don't observe the strong correlations with research environment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-15T14:50:45Z)
• Mapping the Increasing Use of LLMs in Scientific Papers [99.67983375899719]
  We conduct the first systematic, large-scale analysis across 950,965 papers published between January 2020 and February 2024 on the arXiv, bioRxiv, and Nature portfolio journals. Our findings reveal a steady increase in LLM usage, with the largest and fastest growth observed in Computer Science papers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-01T17:45:15Z)
• Position: AI/ML Influencers Have a Place in the Academic Process [82.2069685579588]
  We investigate the role of social media influencers in enhancing the visibility of machine learning research. We have compiled a comprehensive dataset of over 8,000 papers, spanning tweets from December 2018 to October 2023. Our statistical and causal inference analysis reveals a significant increase in citations for papers endorsed by these influencers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-24T20:05:49Z)
• Artificial intelligence adoption in the physical sciences, natural sciences, life sciences, social sciences and the arts and humanities: A bibliometric analysis of research publications from 1960-2021 [73.06361680847708]
  In 1960 14% of 333 research fields were related to AI, but this increased to over half of all research fields by 1972, over 80% by 1986 and over 98% in current times. In 1960 14% of 333 research fields were related to AI (many in computer science), but this increased to over half of all research fields by 1972, over 80% by 1986 and over 98% in current times. We conclude that the context of the current surge appears different, and that interdisciplinary AI application is likely to be sustained.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-15T14:08:07Z)
• A scientometric analysis of the effect of COVID-19 on the spread of research outputs [0.0]
  Sars-COV-2 pandemic in 2020 had a huge impact on the life course of all of us. This rapid spread has caused an increase in the research production in topics related to COVID-19. Italy has, unfortunately, been one of the first countries to be massively involved in the outbreak of the disease.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-01T18:26:37Z)
• Brain Drain and Brain Gain in Russia: Analyzing International Migration of Researchers by Discipline using Scopus Bibliometric Data 1996-2020 [77.34726150561087]
  We analyze all researchers who have published with a Russian affiliation address in Scopus-indexed sources in 1996-2020. While Russia was a donor country in the late 1990s and early 2000s, it has experienced a relatively balanced circulation of researchers in more recent years. Overall, researchers emigrating from Russia outnumbered and outperformed researchers immigrating to Russia.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-07T12:47:38Z)
• Understanding the temporal evolution of COVID-19 research through machine learning and natural language processing [66.63200823918429]
  The outbreak of the novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has been continuously affecting human lives and communities around the world. We used multiple data sources, i.e., PubMed and ArXiv, and built several machine learning models to characterize the landscape of current COVID-19 research. Our findings confirm the types of research available in PubMed and ArXiv differ significantly, with the former exhibiting greater diversity in terms of COVID-19 related issues.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-22T18:02:39Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.