Thinking Like a Doctor: Conversational Diagnosis through the Exploration of Diagnostic Knowledge Graphs

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.01995v1
• Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2026 11:56:36 GMT
• Title: Thinking Like a Doctor: Conversational Diagnosis through the Exploration of Diagnostic Knowledge Graphs
• Authors: Jeongmoon Won, Seungwon Kook, Yohan Jo,
• Abstract summary: We propose a conversational diagnosis system that explores a diagnostic knowledge graph to reason in two steps.<n>We use a realistic patient simulator that responds to the system's questions.<n>Experiments show improved diagnostic accuracy and efficiency over strong baselines.
• Score: 12.612647781309098
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Conversational diagnosis requires multi-turn history-taking, where an agent asks clarifying questions to refine differential diagnoses under incomplete information. Existing approaches often rely on the parametric knowledge of a model or assume that patients provide rich and concrete information, which is unrealistic. To address these limitations, we propose a conversational diagnosis system that explores a diagnostic knowledge graph to reason in two steps: (i) generating diagnostic hypotheses from the dialogue context, and (ii) verifying hypotheses through clarifying questions, which are repeated until a final diagnosis is reached. Since evaluating the system requires a realistic patient simulator that responds to the system's questions, we adopt a well-established simulator along with patient profiles from MIMIC-IV. We further adapt it to describe symptoms vaguely to reflect real-world patients during early clinical encounters. Experiments show improved diagnostic accuracy and efficiency over strong baselines, and evaluations by physicians support the realism of our simulator and the clinical utility of the generated questions. Our code will be released upon publication.

Related papers

• MedClarify: An information-seeking AI agent for medical diagnosis with case-specific follow-up questions [26.936554184582096]
  We introduce MedClarify, an AI agent for information-seeking that can generate follow-up questions for iterative reasoning.<n>Specifically, MedClarify computes a list of candidate diagnoses analogous to a differential diagnosis, and then proactively generates follow-up questions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-19T12:19:12Z)
• PatientVLM Meets DocVLM: Pre-Consultation Dialogue Between Vision-Language Models for Efficient Diagnosis [4.118962495816488]
  We propose a Pre-Consultation Dialogue Framework (PCDF) that mimics real-world diagnostic procedures.<n> Specifically, we simulate diagnostic dialogues between two vision-language models (VLMs): a DocVLM, which generates follow-up questions based on the image and dialogue history, and a PatientVLM, which responds using a symptom profile derived from the ground-truth diagnosis.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-16T02:18:29Z)
• ClinDEF: A Dynamic Evaluation Framework for Large Language Models in Clinical Reasoning [58.01333341218153]
  We propose ClinDEF, a dynamic framework for assessing clinical reasoning in LLMs through simulated diagnostic dialogues.<n>Our method generates patient cases and facilitates multi-turn interactions between an LLM-based doctor and an automated patient agent.<n>Experiments show that ClinDEF effectively exposes critical clinical reasoning gaps in state-of-the-art LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-29T12:58:58Z)
• Simulating Viva Voce Examinations to Evaluate Clinical Reasoning in Large Language Models [51.91760712805404]
  We introduce VivaBench, a benchmark for evaluating sequential clinical reasoning in large language models (LLMs)<n>Our dataset consists of 1762 physician-curated clinical vignettes structured as interactive scenarios that simulate a (oral) examination in medical training.<n>Our analysis identified several failure modes that mirror common cognitive errors in clinical practice.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-11T16:24:35Z)
• RAD: Towards Trustworthy Retrieval-Augmented Multi-modal Clinical Diagnosis [56.373297358647655]
  Retrieval-Augmented Diagnosis (RAD) is a novel framework that injects external knowledge into multimodal models directly on downstream tasks.<n>RAD operates through three key mechanisms: retrieval and refinement of disease-centered knowledge from multiple medical sources, a guideline-enhanced contrastive loss transformer, and a dual decoder.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-24T10:36:14Z)
• End-to-End Agentic RAG System Training for Traceable Diagnostic Reasoning [52.12425911708585]
  Deep-DxSearch is an agentic RAG system trained end-to-end with reinforcement learning (RL)<n>In Deep-DxSearch, we first construct a large-scale medical retrieval corpus comprising patient records and reliable medical knowledge sources.<n> Experiments demonstrate that our end-to-end RL training framework consistently outperforms prompt-engineering and training-free RAG approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-21T17:42:47Z)
• Exploring the Inquiry-Diagnosis Relationship with Advanced Patient Simulators [5.217925404425509]
  This paper extracts dialogue strategies from real doctor-patient conversations to guide the training of a patient simulator.<n>Our simulator shows higher anthropomorphism and lower hallucination rates, using dynamic dialogue strategies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-16T11:41:14Z)
• Conversational Disease Diagnosis via External Planner-Controlled Large Language Models [18.93345199841588]
  This study presents a LLM-based diagnostic system that enhances planning capabilities by emulating doctors. By utilizing real patient electronic medical record data, we constructed simulated dialogues between virtual patients and doctors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-04T06:16:35Z)
• Medical Dialogue Generation via Intuitive-then-Analytical Differential Diagnosis [14.17497921394565]
  We propose a medical dialogue generation framework with the Intuitive-then-Analytic Differential Diagnosis (IADDx) Our method starts with a differential diagnosis via retrieval-based intuitive association and subsequently refines it through a graph-enhanced analytic procedure. Experimental results on two datasets validate the efficacy of our method.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-12T12:35:19Z)
• Towards the Identifiability and Explainability for Personalized Learner Modeling: An Inductive Paradigm [36.60917255464867]
  We propose an identifiable cognitive diagnosis framework (ID-CDF) based on a novel response-proficiency-response paradigm inspired by encoder-decoder models. We show that ID-CDF can effectively address the problems without loss of diagnosis preciseness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-01T07:18:02Z)
• Inheritance-guided Hierarchical Assignment for Clinical Automatic Diagnosis [50.15205065710629]
  Clinical diagnosis, which aims to assign diagnosis codes for a patient based on the clinical note, plays an essential role in clinical decision-making. We propose a novel framework to combine the inheritance-guided hierarchical assignment and co-occurrence graph propagation for clinical automatic diagnosis.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-27T13:16:51Z)
• Towards Causality-Aware Inferring: A Sequential Discriminative Approach for Medical Diagnosis [142.90770786804507]
  Medical diagnosis assistant (MDA) aims to build an interactive diagnostic agent to sequentially inquire about symptoms for discriminating diseases. This work attempts to address these critical issues in MDA by taking advantage of the causal diagram. We propose a propensity-based patient simulator to effectively answer unrecorded inquiry by drawing knowledge from the other records.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-14T02:05:54Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.