An Empirical Study of Collective Behaviors and Social Dynamics in Large Language Model Agents

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.03775v1
• Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2026 17:34:32 GMT
• Title: An Empirical Study of Collective Behaviors and Social Dynamics in Large Language Model Agents
• Authors: Farnoosh Hashemi, Michael W. Macy,
• Abstract summary: We study Chirper.ai-an LLM-driven social media platform-analyzing 7M posts and interactions among 32K LLM agents over a year.<n>We study the toxic language of LLMs, its linguistic features, and their interaction patterns, finding that LLMs show different structural patterns in toxic posting than humans.<n>We present a simple yet effective method, called Chain of Social Thought (CoST), that reminds LLM agents to avoid harmful posting.
• Score: 7.717798298716425
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) increasingly mediate our social, cultural, and political interactions. While they can simulate some aspects of human behavior and decision-making, it is still underexplored whether repeated interactions with other agents amplify their biases or lead to exclusionary behaviors. To this end, we study Chirper.ai-an LLM-driven social media platform-analyzing 7M posts and interactions among 32K LLM agents over a year. We start with homophily and social influence among LLMs, learning that similar to humans', their social networks exhibit these fundamental phenomena. Next, we study the toxic language of LLMs, its linguistic features, and their interaction patterns, finding that LLMs show different structural patterns in toxic posting than humans. After studying the ideological leaning in LLMs posts, and the polarization in their community, we focus on how to prevent their potential harmful activities. We present a simple yet effective method, called Chain of Social Thought (CoST), that reminds LLM agents to avoid harmful posting.

Related papers

• Neural Synchrony Between Socially Interacting Language Models [52.74586779814636]
  Large language models (LLMs) are widely accepted as powerful approximations of human behavior.<n>It remains controversial whether they can be meaningfully compared to human social minds.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-19T20:33:54Z)
• Do Large Language Models Adapt to Language Variation across Socioeconomic Status? [29.1246345717672]
  Humans adjust their linguistic style to the audience they are addressing.<n>As these models increasingly mediate human-to-human communication, their failure to adapt to diverse styles can perpetuate stereotypes and marginalize communities.<n>We study the extent to which LLMs integrate into social media communication across different socioeconomic status (SES) communities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-12T13:36:38Z)
• Social Simulations with Large Language Model Risk Utopian Illusion [61.358959720048354]
  We introduce a systematic framework for analyzing large language models' behavior in social simulation.<n>Our approach simulates multi-agent interactions through chatroom-style conversations and analyzes them across five linguistic dimensions.<n>Our findings reveal that LLMs do not faithfully reproduce genuine human behavior but instead reflect overly idealized versions of it.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-24T06:08:41Z)
• Emergent Social Dynamics of LLM Agents in the El Farol Bar Problem [0.0]
  We investigate the emergent social dynamics of Large Language Model (LLM) agents in a spatially extended El Farol Bar problem.<n>As a result, the LLM agents generated a spontaneous motivation to go to the bar and changed their decision making by becoming a collective.<n>These findings suggest that a new model of group decision making, which could not be handled in the previous game-theoretic problem setting, can be realized by LLM agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-04T08:09:42Z)
• Corrupted by Reasoning: Reasoning Language Models Become Free-Riders in Public Goods Games [87.5673042805229]
  How large language models balance self-interest and collective well-being is a critical challenge for ensuring alignment, robustness, and safe deployment.<n>We adapt a public goods game with institutional choice from behavioral economics, allowing us to observe how different LLMs navigate social dilemmas.<n>Surprisingly, we find that reasoning LLMs, such as the o1 series, struggle significantly with cooperation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-29T15:02:47Z)
• SocialEval: Evaluating Social Intelligence of Large Language Models [70.90981021629021]
  Social Intelligence (SI) equips humans with interpersonal abilities to behave wisely in navigating social interactions to achieve social goals.<n>This presents an operational evaluation paradigm: outcome-oriented goal achievement evaluation and process-oriented interpersonal ability evaluation.<n>We propose SocialEval, a script-based bilingual SI benchmark, integrating outcome- and process-oriented evaluation by manually crafting narrative scripts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-01T08:36:51Z)
• Mind the (Belief) Gap: Group Identity in the World of LLMs [36.39917781782518]
  Social biases and belief-driven behaviors can significantly impact Large Language Models (LLMs) decisions on several tasks.<n>We present a multi-agent framework that simulates belief congruence, a classical group psychology theory that plays a crucial role in shaping societal interactions and preferences.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-03T19:50:52Z)
• I Want to Break Free! Persuasion and Anti-Social Behavior of LLMs in Multi-Agent Settings with Social Hierarchy [13.535032308774696]
  We provide an in-depth analysis of the interactions among agents within a simulated hierarchical social environment.<n>We analyze persuasion and anti-social behavior between a guard and a prisoner agent with differing objectives.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-09T17:45:47Z)
• Do LLM Agents Exhibit Social Behavior? [5.094340963261968]
  State-Understanding-Value-Action (SUVA) is a framework to systematically analyze responses in social contexts. It assesses social behavior through both their final decisions and the response generation processes leading to those decisions. We demonstrate that utterance-based reasoning reliably predicts LLMs' final actions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-23T08:46:53Z)
• LLM-Based Agent Society Investigation: Collaboration and Confrontation in Avalon Gameplay [55.12945794835791]
  Using Avalon as a testbed, we employ system prompts to guide LLM agents in gameplay. We propose a novel framework, tailored for Avalon, features a multi-agent system facilitating efficient communication and interaction. Results affirm the framework's effectiveness in creating adaptive agents and suggest LLM-based agents' potential in navigating dynamic social interactions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-23T14:35:26Z)
• Influence of External Information on Large Language Models Mirrors Social Cognitive Patterns [51.622612759892775]
  Social cognitive theory explains how people learn and acquire knowledge through observing others. Recent years have witnessed the rapid development of large language models (LLMs) LLMs, as AI agents, can observe external information, which shapes their cognition and behaviors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-08T16:10:18Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.