Bypassing the Rationale: Causal Auditing of Implicit Reasoning in Language Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.03994v2
• Date: Sun, 08 Feb 2026 14:54:28 GMT
• Title: Bypassing the Rationale: Causal Auditing of Implicit Reasoning in Language Models
• Authors: Anish Sathyanarayanan, Aditya Nagarsekar, Aarush Rathore,
• Abstract summary: Chain-of-thought (CoT) prompting is widely used as a reasoning aid and is often treated as a transparency mechanism.<n>We introduce a causal, layerwise audit of CoT faithfulness based on activation patching.<n>We find that CoT-specific influence is typically depth-localized into narrow "reasoning windows"
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Chain-of-thought (CoT) prompting is widely used as a reasoning aid and is often treated as a transparency mechanism. Yet behavioral gains under CoT do not imply that the model's internal computation causally depends on the emitted reasoning text, i.e., models may produce fluent rationales while routing decision-critical computation through latent pathways. We introduce a causal, layerwise audit of CoT faithfulness based on activation patching. Our key metric, the CoT Mediation Index (CMI), isolates CoT-specific causal influence by comparing performance degradation from patching CoT-token hidden states against matched control patches. Across multiple model families (Phi, Qwen, DialoGPT) and scales, we find that CoT-specific influence is typically depth-localized into narrow "reasoning windows," and we identify bypass regimes where CMI is near-zero despite plausible CoT text. We further observe that models tuned explicitly for reasoning tend to exhibit stronger and more structured mediation than larger untuned counterparts, while Mixture-of-Experts models show more distributed mediation consistent with routing-based computation. Overall, our results show that CoT faithfulness varies substantially across models and tasks and cannot be inferred from behavior alone, motivating causal, layerwise audits when using CoT as a transparency signal.

Related papers

• ReGuLaR: Variational Latent Reasoning Guided by Rendered Chain-of-Thought [49.203970812338916]
  Explicit reasoning chains introduce substantial computational redundancy.<n>Recent latent reasoning methods attempt to mitigate this by compressing reasoning processes into latent space.<n>We propose Rendered CoT-Guided variational Latent Reasoning (ReGuLaR)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-30T17:08:06Z)
• On the Paradoxical Interference between Instruction-Following and Task Solving [50.75960598434753]
  Instruction following aims to align Large Language Models (LLMs) with human intent by specifying explicit constraints on how tasks should be performed.<n>We reveal a counterintuitive phenomenon: instruction following can paradoxically interfere with LLMs' task-solving capability.<n>We propose a metric, SUSTAINSCORE, to quantify the interference of instruction following with task solving.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-29T17:48:56Z)
• Gaming the Judge: Unfaithful Chain-of-Thought Can Undermine Agent Evaluation [76.5533899503582]
  Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used as judges to evaluate agent performance.<n>We show this paradigm implicitly assumes that the agent's chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning faithfully reflects both its internal reasoning and the underlying environment state.<n>We demonstrate that manipulated reasoning alone can inflate false positive rates of state-of-the-art VLM judges by up to 90% across 800 trajectories spanning diverse web tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-21T06:07:43Z)
• The Bitter Lesson of Diffusion Language Models for Agentic Workflows: A Comprehensive Reality Check [54.08619694620588]
  We present a comprehensive evaluation of dLLMs across two distinct agentic paradigms: Embodied Agents and Tool-Calling Agents.<n>Our results on Agentboard and BFCL reveal a "bitter lesson": current dLLMs fail to serve as reliable agentic backbones.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-19T11:45:39Z)
• CoG: Controllable Graph Reasoning via Relational Blueprints and Failure-Aware Refinement over Knowledge Graphs [53.199517625701475]
  CoG is a training-free framework inspired by Dual-Process Theory that mimics the interplay between intuition and deliberation.<n>CoG significantly outperforms state-of-the-art approaches in both accuracy and efficiency.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-16T07:27:40Z)
• Decoupling the Effect of Chain-of-Thought Reasoning: A Human Label Variation Perspective [60.45433515408158]
  We show that long Chain-of-Thought (CoT) serves as a decisive decision-maker for the top option but fails to function as a granular distribution calibrator for ambiguous tasks.<n>We observe a distinct "decoupled mechanism": while CoT improves distributional alignment, final accuracy is dictated by CoT content.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-06T16:26:40Z)
• The 'Sure' Trap: Multi-Scale Poisoning Analysis of Stealthy Compliance-Only Backdoors in Fine-Tuned Large Language Models [10.377264470934843]
  Backdoor attacks on large language models typically couple a secret trigger to an explicit malicious output.<n>We introduce a compliance-only backdoor: supervised fine-tuning on a mostly benign dataset in which a small subset of prompts is suffixed with an arbitrary single-word trigger.<n>We conduct a multi-scale analysis of this benign-label poisoning behavior across poison budget, total fine-tuning dataset size, and model size.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-16T02:01:58Z)
• Measuring Chain-of-Thought Monitorability Through Faithfulness and Verbosity [3.117948413097524]
  Chain-of-thought (CoT) outputs let us read a model's step-by-step reasoning.<n>We evaluate instruction-tuned and reasoning models on BBH, GPQA, and MMLU.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-31T11:14:39Z)
• Can Reasoning Models Obfuscate Reasoning? Stress-Testing Chain-of-Thought Monitorability [35.180361462848516]
  Chain-of-thought (CoT) is a promising tool for alignment monitoring.<n>Can models obfuscate their CoT in order to pursue hidden adversarial objectives while evading detection?<n>We develop a composable and quantifiable taxonomy of prompts to elicit CoT obfuscation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-21T18:07:10Z)
• SIM-CoT: Supervised Implicit Chain-of-Thought [108.30049193668083]
  Implicit Chain-of-Thought (CoT) methods offer a token-efficient alternative to explicit CoT reasoning in Large Language Models.<n>We identify a core latent instability issue when scaling the computational budget of implicit CoT.<n>We propose SIM-CoT, a plug-and-play training module that introduces step-level supervision to stabilize and enrich the latent reasoning space.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-24T17:01:32Z)
• Analysing Chain of Thought Dynamics: Active Guidance or Unfaithful Post-hoc Rationalisation? [32.02698064940949]
  Chain-of-Thought (CoT) often yields limited gains for soft-reasoning problems.<n>We investigate the dynamics and faithfulness of CoT in soft-reasoning tasks across instruction-tuned, reasoning and reasoning-distilled models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-27T12:25:29Z)
• Token Signature: Predicting Chain-of-Thought Gains with Token Decoding Feature in Large Language Models [9.282278040339138]
  Chain-of-Thought (CoT) technique has proven effective in improving the performance of large language models (LLMs) on complex reasoning tasks.<n>We make a preliminary observation that the monotonicity of token probability distributions may be correlated with the gains achieved through CoT reasoning.<n>We propose two indicators based on the token probability distribution to assess CoT effectiveness across different tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-06T11:53:27Z)
• A Closer Look at Bias and Chain-of-Thought Faithfulness of Large (Vision) Language Models [58.32070787537946]
  Chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning enhances performance of large language models.<n>We present the first comprehensive study of CoT faithfulness in large vision-language models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-29T18:55:05Z)
• Mitigating Deceptive Alignment via Self-Monitoring [15.365589693661823]
  We develop a framework that embeds a Self-Monitor inside the chain-of-thought process itself, named CoT Monitor+.<n>During generation, the model produces (i) ordinary reasoning steps and (ii) an internal self-evaluation signal trained to flag and suppress misaligned strategies.<n>The signal is used as an auxiliary reward in reinforcement learning, creating a feedback loop that rewards honest reasoning and discourages hidden goals.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-24T17:41:47Z)
• The Curse of CoT: On the Limitations of Chain-of-Thought in In-Context Learning [56.574829311863446]
  Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompting has been widely recognized for its ability to enhance reasoning capabilities in large language models (LLMs)<n>We demonstrate that CoT and its reasoning variants consistently underperform direct answering across varying model scales and benchmark complexities.<n>Our analysis uncovers a fundamental hybrid mechanism of explicit-implicit reasoning driving CoT's performance in pattern-based ICL.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-07T13:51:06Z)
• When More is Less: Understanding Chain-of-Thought Length in LLMs [51.631483479081645]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) employ Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning to deconstruct complex problems.<n>This paper argues that longer CoTs are often presumed superior, arguing that longer is not always better.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-11T05:28:59Z)
• Analyzing Chain-of-Thought Prompting in Large Language Models via Gradient-based Feature Attributions [10.621564997491808]
  Chain-of-thought (CoT) prompting has been shown to empirically improve the accuracy of large language models. We investigate whether CoT prompting affects the relative importances they assign to particular input tokens. Our results indicate that while CoT prompting does not increase the magnitude of saliency scores attributed to semantically relevant tokens in the prompt, it increases the robustness of saliency scores to question perturbations and variations in model output.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-25T08:51:30Z)
• Measuring Faithfulness in Chain-of-Thought Reasoning [19.074147845029355]
  Large language models (LLMs) perform better when they produce step-by-step, "Chain-of-Thought" (CoT) reasoning before answering a question. It is unclear if the stated reasoning is a faithful explanation of the model's actual reasoning (i.e., its process for answering the question) We investigate hypotheses for how CoT reasoning may be unfaithful, by examining how the model predictions change when we intervene on the CoT.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-17T01:08:39Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.