Revisiting Prompt Sensitivity in Large Language Models for Text Classification: The Role of Prompt Underspecification

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.04297v1
• Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2026 07:59:28 GMT
• Title: Revisiting Prompt Sensitivity in Large Language Models for Text Classification: The Role of Prompt Underspecification
• Authors: Branislav Pecher, Michal Spiegel, Robert Belanec, Jan Cegin,
• Abstract summary: Large language models (LLMs) are widely used as zero-shot and few-shot classifiers.<n>We study and compare the sensitivity of underspecified prompts and prompts that provide specific instructions.<n>We find that underspecified prompts exhibit higher performance variance and lower logit values for relevant tokens, while instruction-prompts suffer less from such problems.
• Score: 3.2059646106414967
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) are widely used as zero-shot and few-shot classifiers, where task behaviour is largely controlled through prompting. A growing number of works have observed that LLMs are sensitive to prompt variations, with small changes leading to large changes in performance. However, in many cases, the investigation of sensitivity is performed using underspecified prompts that provide minimal task instructions and weakly constrain the model's output space. In this work, we argue that a significant portion of the observed prompt sensitivity can be attributed to prompt underspecification. We systematically study and compare the sensitivity of underspecified prompts and prompts that provide specific instructions. Utilising performance analysis, logit analysis, and linear probing, we find that underspecified prompts exhibit higher performance variance and lower logit values for relevant tokens, while instruction-prompts suffer less from such problems. However, linear probing analysis suggests that the effects of prompt underspecification have only a marginal impact on the internal LLM representations, instead emerging in the final layers. Overall, our findings highlight the need for more rigour when investigating and mitigating prompt sensitivity.

Related papers

• Farther the Shift, Sparser the Representation: Analyzing OOD Mechanisms in LLMs [100.02824137397464]
  We investigate how Large Language Models adapt their internal representations when encountering inputs of increasing difficulty.<n>We reveal a consistent and quantifiable phenomenon: as task difficulty increases, the last hidden states of LLMs become substantially sparser.<n>This sparsity--difficulty relation is observable across diverse models and domains.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-03T18:48:15Z)
• Do Prompts Reshape Representations? An Empirical Study of Prompting Effects on Embeddings [24.17559821473242]
  We study the relationship between prompting and the quality of internal representations.<n>Our findings challenge the assumption that more relevant prompts necessarily lead to better representations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-22T15:43:40Z)
• ProSA: Assessing and Understanding the Prompt Sensitivity of LLMs [72.13489820420726]
  ProSA is a framework designed to evaluate and comprehend prompt sensitivity in large language models. Our study uncovers that prompt sensitivity fluctuates across datasets and models, with larger models exhibiting enhanced robustness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-16T09:38:13Z)
• POSIX: A Prompt Sensitivity Index For Large Language Models [22.288479270814484]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) are surprisingly sensitive to minor variations in prompts. POSIX is a novel PrOmpt Sensitivity IndeX as a reliable measure of prompt sensitivity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-03T04:01:14Z)
• On the Worst Prompt Performance of Large Language Models [93.13542053835542]
  Performance of large language models (LLMs) is acutely sensitive to the phrasing of prompts. We introduce RobustAlpacaEval, a new benchmark that consists of semantically equivalent case-level queries. Experiments on RobustAlpacaEval with ChatGPT and six open-source LLMs from the Llama, Mistral, and Gemma families uncover substantial variability in model performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-08T13:40:38Z)
• How You Prompt Matters! Even Task-Oriented Constraints in Instructions Affect LLM-Generated Text Detection [39.254432080406346]
  Even task-oriented constraints -- constraints that would naturally be included in an instruction and are not related to detection-evasion -- cause existing powerful detectors to have a large variance in detection performance. Our experiments show that the standard deviation (SD) of current detector performance on texts generated by an instruction with such a constraint is significantly larger (up to an SD of 14.4 F1-score) than that by generating texts multiple times or paraphrasing the instruction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-14T18:32:52Z)
• How are Prompts Different in Terms of Sensitivity? [50.67313477651395]
  We present a comprehensive prompt analysis based on the sensitivity of a function. We use gradient-based saliency scores to empirically demonstrate how different prompts affect the relevance of input tokens to the output. We introduce sensitivity-aware decoding which incorporates sensitivity estimation as a penalty term in the standard greedy decoding.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-13T10:52:01Z)
• Quantifying Language Models' Sensitivity to Spurious Features in Prompt Design or: How I learned to start worrying about prompt formatting [68.19544657508509]
  Large language models (LLMs) are adopted as a fundamental component of language technologies. We find that several widely used open-source LLMs are extremely sensitive to subtle changes in prompt format in few-shot settings. We propose an algorithm that rapidly evaluates a sampled set of plausible prompt formats for a given task, and reports the interval of expected performance without accessing model weights.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-17T15:03:30Z)
• Demystifying Prompts in Language Models via Perplexity Estimation [109.59105230163041]
  Performance of a prompt is coupled with the extent to which the model is familiar with the language it contains. We show that the lower the perplexity of the prompt is, the better the prompt is able to perform the task.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-08T02:21:47Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.