"Be My Cheese?": Cultural Nuance Benchmarking for Machine Translation in Multilingual LLMs

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.04729v1
• Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2026 16:35:48 GMT
• Title: "Be My Cheese?": Cultural Nuance Benchmarking for Machine Translation in Multilingual LLMs
• Abstract summary: We present a large-scale human evaluation benchmark for assessing cultural localisation in machine translation.<n>We evaluate 7 multilingual large language models (LLMs) across 15 target languages with 5 native-speaker raters per language.<n>Across full-text evaluations, mean overall quality is modest (1.68/3): GPT-5 (2.10/3), Claude Sonnet 3.7 (1.97/3), and Mistral Medium 3.1 (1.84/3) form the strongest tier with fewer catastrophic failures.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: We present a large-scale human evaluation benchmark for assessing cultural localisation in machine translation produced by state-of-the-art multilingual large language models (LLMs). Existing MT benchmarks emphasise token-level and grammatical accuracy, but of ten overlook pragmatic and culturally grounded competencies required for real-world localisation. Building on a pilot study of 87 translations across 20 languages, we evaluate 7 multilingual LLMs across 15 target languages with 5 native-speaker raters per language. Raters scored both full-text translations and segment-level instances of culturally nuanced language (idioms, puns, holidays, and culturally embedded concepts) on an ordinal 0-3 quality scale; segment ratings additionally included an NA option for untranslated segments. Across full-text evaluations, mean overall quality is modest (1.68/3): GPT-5 (2.10/3), Claude Sonnet 3.7 (1.97/3), and Mistral Medium 3.1 (1.84/3) form the strongest tier with fewer catastrophic failures. Segment-level results show sharp category effects: holidays (2.20/3) and cultural concepts (2.19/3) translate substantially better than idioms (1.65/3) and puns (1.45/3), and idioms are most likely to be left untranslated. These findings demonstrate a persistent gap between grammatical adequacy and cultural resonance. To our knowledge, this is the first multilingual, human-annotated benchmark focused explicitly on cultural nuance in translation and localisation, highlighting the need for culturally informed training data, improved cross-lingual pragmatics, and evaluation paradigms that better reflect real-world communicative competence.

Related papers

• CultureConverse: A Multilingual Multi-turn Simulation Harness for Culturally Grounded Assistance in East and Southeast Asia [72.20656906184539]
  We introduce CultureConverse, a scalable, multilingual simulation and evaluation harness for culturally grounded assistant dialogue.<n>The resulting CultureConverse-DS dataset contains 14,610 benchmark (evaluation) episodes and 274,295 oracle-guided (gold-mode) dialogues.<n>Human annotation experiments suggest that our evaluation framework is a sufficient proxy for human judgment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-28T14:56:46Z)
• MSQA: A Natively Sourced Multilingual and Multicultural SimpleQA Benchmark [31.67992649991894]
  A model that can speak a user's language must also understand the culture encoded by that language.<n>We introduce MSQA, a benchmark of 1,064 natively sourced questions across 11 language groups, five cultural dimensions, and three difficulty tiers.<n>We find substantial cultural degradation and a pronounced Locality Effect.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-01T10:12:03Z)
• Culturally-Adapted Red-Teaming Across East and Southeast Asian Contexts: A Methodological and Comparative Analysis [2.8523456804049885]
  We construct paired DT and culturally-adapted datasets via 1:1 seed matching for four languages.<n>We compare Attack Success Rate (ASR) and Cultural Realism scores across four open-source safety evaluations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-08T08:17:18Z)
• Beyond Literal Translation: Evaluating Cultural Effectiveness in Social Media UGC [39.66998905774523]
  We introduce CULTURE-MT, a benchmark for social media translation.<n>CULTURE-MT consists of 1,002 notes across 14 domains, categorized into four types based on culture-loaded symbols and linguistic style features.<n>We propose cultural effectiveness as a new evaluation criterion, focusing on expression accuracy and cultural adaptability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-25T09:29:25Z)
• The GaoYao Benchmark: A Comprehensive Framework for Evaluating Multilingual and Multicultural Abilities of Large Language Models [51.61416200800499]
  GaoYao is a comprehensive benchmark with 182.3k samples, 26 languages and 51 nations/areas.<n>First, GaoYao proposes a unified framework categorizing evaluation tasks into three cultural layers.<n>Second, we achieve native-quality expansion by leveraging experts to rigorously localize subjective benchmarks into 19 languages.<n>Third, we conduct an in-depth diagnostic analysis on 20+ flagship and compact LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-22T06:19:46Z)
• Extending Beacon to Hindi: Cultural Adaptation Drives Cross-Lingual Sycophancy [0.0]
  Sycophancy is the tendency of language models to prioritize agreement with user preferences over principled reasoning.<n>We extend the Beacon single-turn forced-choice sycophancy diagnostic to Hindi through a controlled three-condition design.<n>Across all models, sycophancy rates are consistently higher for culturally adapted Hindi prompts than for English.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-19T12:03:52Z)
• Evaluating Modern Large Language Models on Low-Resource and Morphologically Rich Languages:A Cross-Lingual Benchmark Across Cantonese, Japanese, and Turkish [12.286855282078305]
  GPT-4o, GPT-4, Claude3.5Sonnet, LLaMA3.1, MistralLarge2, LLaMA-2Chat13B, and Mistral7BInstruct are evaluated.<n>Our benchmark spans four diverse tasks: open-domain question answering, document summarization, English-to-X translation, and culturally grounded dialogue.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-05T22:09:53Z)
• MMA-ASIA: A Multilingual and Multimodal Alignment Framework for Culturally-Grounded Evaluation [91.22008265721952]
  MMA-ASIA centers on a human-curated, multilingual, and multimodally aligned benchmark covering 8 Asian countries and 10 languages.<n>This is the first dataset aligned at the input level across three modalities: text, image (visual question answering), and speech.<n>We propose a five-dimensional evaluation protocol that measures: (i) cultural-awareness disparities across countries, (ii) cross-lingual consistency, (iii) cross-modal consistency, (iv) cultural knowledge generalization, and (v) grounding validity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-07T14:12:12Z)
• Languages Still Left Behind: Toward a Better Multilingual Machine Translation Benchmark [11.068031181100276]
  We study data in four languages (Asante Twi, Japanese, Jinghpaw, and South Azerbaijani)<n>We uncover critical shortcomings in the benchmark's suitability for truly multilingual evaluation.<n>We advocate for multilingual MT benchmarks that use domain-general and culturally neutral source texts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-28T07:52:42Z)
• Disentangling Language and Culture for Evaluating Multilingual Large Language Models [48.06219053598005]
  This paper introduces a Dual Evaluation Framework to comprehensively assess the multilingual capabilities of LLMs.<n>By decomposing the evaluation along the dimensions of linguistic medium and cultural context, this framework enables a nuanced analysis of LLMs' ability to process questions cross-lingually.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-30T14:25:45Z)
• MAKIEval: A Multilingual Automatic WiKidata-based Framework for Cultural Awareness Evaluation for LLMs [37.98920430188422]
  MAKIEval is an automatic multilingual framework for evaluating cultural awareness in large language models.<n>It automatically identifies cultural entities in model outputs and links them to structured knowledge.<n>We assess 7 LLMs developed from different parts of the world, encompassing both open-source and proprietary systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-27T19:29:40Z)
• JiraiBench: A Bilingual Benchmark for Evaluating Large Language Models' Detection of Human Self-Destructive Behavior Content in Jirai Community [9.492476871323763]
  This paper introduces JiraiBench, the first bilingual benchmark for evaluating large language models' effectiveness in detecting self-destructive content.<n>We focus on the transnational "Jirai" (landmine) online subculture that encompasses multiple forms of self-destructive behaviors including drug overdose, eating disorders, and self-harm.<n>Our dataset comprises 10,419 Chinese posts and 5,000 Japanese posts with multidimensional annotation along three behavioral categories.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-27T16:48:58Z)
• MMLU-ProX: A Multilingual Benchmark for Advanced Large Language Model Evaluation [86.7047714187813]
  MMLU-ProX is a benchmark covering 29 languages, built on an English benchmark.<n>Each language version consists of 11,829 identical questions, enabling direct cross-linguistic comparisons.<n>To meet efficient evaluation needs, we provide a lite version containing 658 questions per language.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-13T15:59:20Z)
• Centurio: On Drivers of Multilingual Ability of Large Vision-Language Model [66.17354128553244]
  Most Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) to date are trained predominantly on English data.<n>We investigate how different training mixes tip the scale for different groups of languages.<n>We train Centurio, a 100-language LVLM, offering state-of-the-art performance in an evaluation covering 14 tasks and 56 languages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-09T10:26:14Z)
• Global MMLU: Understanding and Addressing Cultural and Linguistic Biases in Multilingual Evaluation [71.59208664920452]
  Cultural biases in multilingual datasets pose significant challenges for their effectiveness as global benchmarks.<n>We show that progress on MMLU depends heavily on learning Western-centric concepts, with 28% of all questions requiring culturally sensitive knowledge.<n>We release Global MMLU, an improved MMLU with evaluation coverage across 42 languages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-04T13:27:09Z)
• DEEP: DEnoising Entity Pre-training for Neural Machine Translation [123.6686940355937]
  It has been shown that machine translation models usually generate poor translations for named entities that are infrequent in the training corpus. We propose DEEP, a DEnoising Entity Pre-training method that leverages large amounts of monolingual data and a knowledge base to improve named entity translation accuracy within sentences.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-14T17:28:09Z)
• Inducing Language-Agnostic Multilingual Representations [61.97381112847459]
  Cross-lingual representations have the potential to make NLP techniques available to the vast majority of languages in the world. We examine three approaches for this: (i) re-aligning the vector spaces of target languages to a pivot source language; (ii) removing language-specific means and variances, which yields better discriminativeness of embeddings as a by-product; and (iii) increasing input similarity across languages by removing morphological contractions and sentence reordering.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-20T17:58:56Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.