Automatic Cognitive Task Generation for In-Situ Evaluation of Embodied Agents
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.05249v1
- Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2026 03:07:00 GMT
- Title: Automatic Cognitive Task Generation for In-Situ Evaluation of Embodied Agents
- Authors: Xinyi He, Ying Yang, Chuanjian Fu, Sihan Guo, Songchun Zhu, Lifeng Fan, Zhenliang Zhang, Yujia Peng,
- Abstract summary: We propose a dynamic in-situ task generation method for unseen environments inspired by human cognition.<n>In the interaction stage, the agent actively interacts with the environment, creating a loop between task execution and generation.<n>Experiments across 10 unseen scenes demonstrate that TEA automatically generated 87,876 tasks in two cycles.
- Score: 43.01384379901339
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: As general intelligent agents are poised for widespread deployment in diverse households, evaluation tailored to each unique unseen 3D environment has become a critical prerequisite. However, existing benchmarks suffer from severe data contamination and a lack of scene specificity, inadequate for assessing agent capabilities in unseen settings. To address this, we propose a dynamic in-situ task generation method for unseen environments inspired by human cognition. We define tasks through a structured graph representation and construct a two-stage interaction-evolution task generation system for embodied agents (TEA). In the interaction stage, the agent actively interacts with the environment, creating a loop between task execution and generation that allows for continuous task generation. In the evolution stage, task graph modeling allows us to recombine and reuse existing tasks to generate new ones without external data. Experiments across 10 unseen scenes demonstrate that TEA automatically generated 87,876 tasks in two cycles, which human verification confirmed to be physically reasonable and encompassing essential daily cognitive capabilities. Benchmarking SOTA models against humans on our in-situ tasks reveals that models, despite excelling on public benchmarks, perform surprisingly poorly on basic perception tasks, severely lack 3D interaction awareness and show high sensitivity to task types in reasoning. These sobering findings highlight the necessity of in-situ evaluation before deploying agents into real-world human environments.
Related papers
- Autonomous Continual Learning of Computer-Use Agents for Environment Adaptation [57.65688895630163]
We introduce ACuRL, an Autonomous Curriculum Reinforcement Learning framework that continually adapts agents to specific environments with zero human data.<n>Our method effectively enables both intra-environment and cross-environment continual learning, yielding 4-22% performance gains without forgetting existing environments.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-10T23:06:02Z) - What Do LLM Agents Know About Their World? Task2Quiz: A Paradigm for Studying Environment Understanding [50.35012849818872]
Large language model (LLM) agents have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in complex decision-making and tool-use tasks.<n>We propose Task-to-Quiz (T2Q), a deterministic and automated evaluation paradigm designed to decouple task execution from world-state understanding.<n>Our experiments reveal that task success is often a poor proxy for environment understanding, and that current memory machanism can not effectively help agents acquire a grounded model of the environment.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-14T14:09:11Z) - Generalizable Geometric Prior and Recurrent Spiking Feature Learning for Humanoid Robot Manipulation [90.90219129619344]
This paper presents a novel R-prior-S, Recurrent Geometric-priormodal Policy with Spiking features.<n>To ground high-level reasoning in physical reality, we leverage lightweight 2D geometric inductive biases.<n>For the data efficiency issue in robotic action generation, we introduce a Recursive Adaptive Spiking Network.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-13T23:36:30Z) - The Agent's First Day: Benchmarking Learning, Exploration, and Scheduling in the Workplace Scenarios [34.25281365374991]
We introduce method, a dynamic evaluation environment that simulates a "trainee" agent continuously exploring a novel setting.<n>Unlike traditional benchmarks, method evaluates agents along three dimensions: (1) context-aware scheduling for streaming tasks with varying priorities; (2) prudent information acquisition to reduce hallucination via active exploration; and (3) continuous evolution by distilling generalized strategies from rule-based, dynamically generated tasks.<n>Our work establishes a framework for assessing agent reliability, shifting evaluation from static tests to realistic, production-oriented scenarios.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-13T03:09:18Z) - CuES: A Curiosity-driven and Environment-grounded Synthesis Framework for Agentic RL [35.086788669916594]
Large language model based agents are increasingly deployed in complex, tool augmented environments.<n>Existing approaches typically assume predefined task collections, an assumption that fails in novel environments.<n>We propose CuES, a Curiosity driven and Environment grounded Synthesis framework that autonomously generates diverse, executable, and meaningful tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-12-01T06:11:37Z) - Interactive Agents to Overcome Ambiguity in Software Engineering [61.40183840499932]
AI agents are increasingly being deployed to automate tasks, often based on ambiguous and underspecified user instructions.<n>Making unwarranted assumptions and failing to ask clarifying questions can lead to suboptimal outcomes.<n>We study the ability of LLM agents to handle ambiguous instructions in interactive code generation settings by evaluating proprietary and open-weight models on their performance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-18T17:12:26Z) - On the Evaluation of Generative Robotic Simulations [35.8253733339539]
We propose a comprehensive evaluation framework tailored to generative simulations.
For single-task quality, we evaluate the realism of the generated task and the completeness of the generated trajectories.
For task-level generalization, we assess the zero-shot generalization ability on unseen tasks of a policy trained with multiple generated tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-10T17:49:25Z) - Ag2Manip: Learning Novel Manipulation Skills with Agent-Agnostic Visual and Action Representations [77.31328397965653]
We introduce Ag2Manip (Agent-Agnostic representations for Manipulation), a framework aimed at surmounting challenges through two key innovations.
A novel agent-agnostic visual representation derived from human manipulation videos, with the specifics of embodiments obscured to enhance generalizability.
An agent-agnostic action representation abstracting a robot's kinematics to a universal agent proxy, emphasizing crucial interactions between end-effector and object.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-26T16:40:17Z) - Egocentric Planning for Scalable Embodied Task Achievement [6.870094263016224]
Egocentric Planning is an innovative approach that combines symbolic planning and Object-oriented POMDPs to solve tasks in complex environments.
We evaluated our approach in ALFRED, a simulated environment designed for domestic tasks, and demonstrated its high scalability.
Our method requires reliable perception and the specification or learning of a symbolic description of the preconditions and effects of the agent's actions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-06-02T06:41:24Z) - Reinforcement Learning for Sparse-Reward Object-Interaction Tasks in a
First-person Simulated 3D Environment [73.9469267445146]
First-person object-interaction tasks in high-fidelity, 3D, simulated environments such as the AI2Thor pose significant sample-efficiency challenges for reinforcement learning agents.
We show that one can learn object-interaction tasks from scratch without supervision by learning an attentive object-model as an auxiliary task.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-10-28T19:27:26Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.