Tuning Out-of-Distribution (OOD) Detectors Without Given OOD Data

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.05935v1
• Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2026 17:46:40 GMT
• Title: Tuning Out-of-Distribution (OOD) Detectors Without Given OOD Data
• Authors: Sudeepta Mondal, Xinyi Mary Xie, Ruxiao Duan, Alex Wong, Ganesh Sundaramoorthi,
• Abstract summary: We show that there can be significant variance in performance of detectors based on the adhoc dataset chosen in current literature.<n>We propose a new generic approach to OOD detector tuning that does not require any extra data other than those used to train the NN.
• Score: 6.9811489353726826
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Existing out-of-distribution (OOD) detectors are often tuned by a separate dataset deemed OOD with respect to the training distribution of a neural network (NN). OOD detectors process the activations of NN layers and score the output, where parameters of the detectors are determined by fitting to an in-distribution (training) set and the aforementioned dataset chosen adhocly. At detector training time, this adhoc dataset may not be available or difficult to obtain, and even when it's available, it may not be representative of actual OOD data, which is often ''unknown unknowns." Current benchmarks may specify some left-out set from test OOD sets. We show that there can be significant variance in performance of detectors based on the adhoc dataset chosen in current literature, and thus even if such a dataset can be collected, the performance of the detector may be highly dependent on the choice. In this paper, we introduce and formalize the often neglected problem of tuning OOD detectors without a given ``OOD'' dataset. To this end, we present strong baselines as an attempt to approach this problem. Furthermore, we propose a new generic approach to OOD detector tuning that does not require any extra data other than those used to train the NN. We show that our approach improves over baseline methods consistently across higher-parameter OOD detector families, while being comparable across lower-parameter families.

Related papers

• Uncertainty-Aware Out-of-Distribution Detection with Gaussian Processes [13.246251147975192]
  Deep neural networks (DNNs) are often constructed under the closed-world assumption.<n>OOD samples are not always available during the training phase in real-world applications.<n>We propose a Gaussian-process-based OOD detection method to establish a decision boundary based on InD data only.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-30T12:57:31Z)
• Out-of-Distribution Detection with Overlap Index [22.92968284023414]
  Out-of-distribution (OOD) detection is crucial for the deployment of machine learning models in the open world.<n>We propose a novel effective OOD detection approach that employs an overlap index (OI)-based confidence score function.<n>We show that our OI-based OOD detector is competitive with state-of-the-art OOD detectors in terms of detection accuracy on a wide range of datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-09T03:01:47Z)
• Out-of-distribution Detection Learning with Unreliable Out-of-distribution Sources [73.28967478098107]
  Out-of-distribution (OOD) detection discerns OOD data where the predictor cannot make valid predictions as in-distribution (ID) data. It is typically hard to collect real out-of-distribution (OOD) data for training a predictor capable of discerning OOD patterns. We propose a data generation-based learning method named Auxiliary Task-based OOD Learning (ATOL) that can relieve the mistaken OOD generation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-06T16:26:52Z)
• AUTO: Adaptive Outlier Optimization for Test-Time OOD Detection [79.51071170042972]
  Out-of-distribution (OOD) detection aims to detect test samples that do not fall into any training in-distribution (ID) classes.<n>Data safety and privacy make it infeasible to collect task-specific outliers in advance for different scenarios.<n>We present test-time OOD detection, which allows the deployed model to utilize real OOD data from the unlabeled data stream during testing.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-22T02:28:54Z)
• Unsupervised Evaluation of Out-of-distribution Detection: A Data-centric Perspective [55.45202687256175]
  Out-of-distribution (OOD) detection methods assume that they have test ground truths, i.e., whether individual test samples are in-distribution (IND) or OOD. In this paper, we are the first to introduce the unsupervised evaluation problem in OOD detection. We propose three methods to compute Gscore as an unsupervised indicator of OOD detection performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-16T13:34:35Z)
• Augmenting Softmax Information for Selective Classification with Out-of-Distribution Data [7.221206118679026]
  We show that existing post-hoc methods perform quite differently compared to when evaluated only on OOD detection. We propose a novel method for SCOD, Softmax Information Retaining Combination (SIRC), that augments softmax-based confidence scores with feature-agnostic information. Experiments on a wide variety of ImageNet-scale datasets and convolutional neural network architectures show that SIRC is able to consistently match or outperform the baseline for SCOD.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-15T14:39:57Z)
• No True State-of-the-Art? OOD Detection Methods are Inconsistent across Datasets [69.725266027309]
  Out-of-distribution detection is an important component of reliable ML systems. In this work, we show that none of these methods are inherently better at OOD detection than others on a standardized set of 16 pairs. We also show that a method outperforming another on a certain (ID, OOD) pair may not do so in a low-data regime.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-12T16:35:00Z)
• Provably Robust Detection of Out-of-distribution Data (almost) for free [124.14121487542613]
  Deep neural networks are known to produce highly overconfident predictions on out-of-distribution (OOD) data. In this paper we propose a novel method where from first principles we combine a certifiable OOD detector with a standard classifier into an OOD aware classifier. In this way we achieve the best of two worlds: certifiably adversarially robust OOD detection, even for OOD samples close to the in-distribution, without loss in prediction accuracy and close to state-of-the-art OOD detection performance for non-manipulated OOD data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-08T11:40:49Z)
• Learn what you can't learn: Regularized Ensembles for Transductive Out-of-distribution Detection [76.39067237772286]
  We show that current out-of-distribution (OOD) detection algorithms for neural networks produce unsatisfactory results in a variety of OOD detection scenarios. This paper studies how such "hard" OOD scenarios can benefit from adjusting the detection method after observing a batch of the test data. We propose a novel method that uses an artificial labeling scheme for the test data and regularization to obtain ensembles of models that produce contradictory predictions only on the OOD samples in a test batch.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-10T16:55:13Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.