No True State-of-the-Art? OOD Detection Methods are Inconsistent across Datasets

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2109.05554v1
• Date: Sun, 12 Sep 2021 16:35:00 GMT
• Title: No True State-of-the-Art? OOD Detection Methods are Inconsistent across Datasets
• Authors: Fahim Tajwar, Ananya Kumar, Sang Michael Xie, Percy Liang
• Abstract summary: Out-of-distribution detection is an important component of reliable ML systems. In this work, we show that none of these methods are inherently better at OOD detection than others on a standardized set of 16 pairs. We also show that a method outperforming another on a certain (ID, OOD) pair may not do so in a low-data regime.
• Score: 69.725266027309
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Out-of-distribution detection is an important component of reliable ML systems. Prior literature has proposed various methods (e.g., MSP (Hendrycks & Gimpel, 2017), ODIN (Liang et al., 2018), Mahalanobis (Lee et al., 2018)), claiming they are state-of-the-art by showing they outperform previous methods on a selected set of in-distribution (ID) and out-of-distribution (OOD) datasets. In this work, we show that none of these methods are inherently better at OOD detection than others on a standardized set of 16 (ID, OOD) pairs. We give possible explanations for these inconsistencies with simple toy datasets where whether one method outperforms another depends on the structure of the ID and OOD datasets in question. Finally, we show that a method outperforming another on a certain (ID, OOD) pair may not do so in a low-data regime. In the low-data regime, we propose a distance-based method, Pairwise OOD detection (POD), which is based on Siamese networks and improves over Mahalanobis by sidestepping the expensive covariance estimation step. Our results suggest that the OOD detection problem may be too broad, and we should consider more specific structures for leverage.

Related papers

• What If the Input is Expanded in OOD Detection? [77.37433624869857]
  Out-of-distribution (OOD) detection aims to identify OOD inputs from unknown classes. Various scoring functions are proposed to distinguish it from in-distribution (ID) data. We introduce a novel perspective, i.e., employing different common corruptions on the input space.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-24T06:47:28Z)
• Margin-bounded Confidence Scores for Out-of-Distribution Detection [2.373572816573706]
  We propose a novel method called Margin bounded Confidence Scores (MaCS) to address the nontrivial OOD detection problem. MaCS enlarges the disparity between ID and OOD scores, which in turn makes the decision boundary more compact. Experiments on various benchmark datasets for image classification tasks demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-22T05:40:25Z)
• Rethinking the Evaluation of Out-of-Distribution Detection: A Sorites Paradox [70.57120710151105]
  Most existing out-of-distribution (OOD) detection benchmarks classify samples with novel labels as the OOD data. Some marginal OOD samples actually have close semantic contents to the in-distribution (ID) sample, which makes determining the OOD sample a Sorites Paradox. We construct a benchmark named Incremental Shift OOD (IS-OOD) to address the issue.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-14T09:27:56Z)
• How to Overcome Curse-of-Dimensionality for Out-of-Distribution Detection? [29.668859994222238]
  We propose a novel framework, Subspace Nearest Neighbor (SNN), for OOD detection. In training, our method regularizes the model and its feature representation by leveraging the most relevant subset of dimensions. Compared to the current best distance-based method, SNN reduces the average FPR95 by 15.96% on the CIFAR-100 benchmark.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-22T06:04:09Z)
• EAT: Towards Long-Tailed Out-of-Distribution Detection [55.380390767978554]
  This paper addresses the challenging task of long-tailed OOD detection. The main difficulty lies in distinguishing OOD data from samples belonging to the tail classes. We propose two simple ideas: (1) Expanding the in-distribution class space by introducing multiple abstention classes, and (2) Augmenting the context-limited tail classes by overlaying images onto the context-rich OOD data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-14T13:47:13Z)
• Model-free Test Time Adaptation for Out-Of-Distribution Detection [62.49795078366206]
  We propose a Non-Parametric Test Time textbfAdaptation framework for textbfDistribution textbfDetection (abbr) abbr utilizes online test samples for model adaptation during testing, enhancing adaptability to changing data distributions. We demonstrate the effectiveness of abbr through comprehensive experiments on multiple OOD detection benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-28T02:00:47Z)
• Out-of-distribution Detection Learning with Unreliable Out-of-distribution Sources [73.28967478098107]
  Out-of-distribution (OOD) detection discerns OOD data where the predictor cannot make valid predictions as in-distribution (ID) data. It is typically hard to collect real out-of-distribution (OOD) data for training a predictor capable of discerning OOD patterns. We propose a data generation-based learning method named Auxiliary Task-based OOD Learning (ATOL) that can relieve the mistaken OOD generation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-06T16:26:52Z)
• Augmenting Softmax Information for Selective Classification with Out-of-Distribution Data [7.221206118679026]
  We show that existing post-hoc methods perform quite differently compared to when evaluated only on OOD detection. We propose a novel method for SCOD, Softmax Information Retaining Combination (SIRC), that augments softmax-based confidence scores with feature-agnostic information. Experiments on a wide variety of ImageNet-scale datasets and convolutional neural network architectures show that SIRC is able to consistently match or outperform the baseline for SCOD.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-15T14:39:57Z)
• Out-of-distribution Detection with Deep Nearest Neighbors [33.71627349163909]
  Out-of-distribution (OOD) detection is a critical task for deploying machine learning models in the open world. In this paper, we explore the efficacy of non-parametric nearest-neighbor distance for OOD detection. We demonstrate the effectiveness of nearest-neighbor-based OOD detection on several benchmarks and establish superior performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-13T16:45:21Z)
• Training OOD Detectors in their Natural Habitats [31.565635192716712]
  Out-of-distribution (OOD) detection is important for machine learning models deployed in the wild. Recent methods use auxiliary outlier data to regularize the model for improved OOD detection. We propose a novel framework that leverages wild mixture data -- that naturally consists of both ID and OOD samples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-07T15:38:39Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.