UniComp: A Unified Evaluation of Large Language Model Compression via Pruning, Quantization and Distillation
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.09130v2
- Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2026 09:09:33 GMT
- Title: UniComp: A Unified Evaluation of Large Language Model Compression via Pruning, Quantization and Distillation
- Authors: Jonathan von Rad, Yong Cao, Andreas Geiger,
- Abstract summary: We introduce UniComp, a unified evaluation framework for comparing pruning, quantization, and knowledge distillation.<n>UniComp evaluates compressed models along three dimensions: performance, reliability, and efficiency.
- Score: 23.560232846931456
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Model compression is increasingly essential for deploying large language models (LLMs), yet existing evaluations are limited in method coverage and focus primarily on knowledge-centric benchmarks. Thus, we introduce UniComp, a unified evaluation framework for comparing pruning, quantization, and knowledge distillation. UniComp evaluates compressed models along three dimensions: performance, reliability, and efficiency, using a diverse set of capability- and safety-oriented benchmarks together with a hardware-aware efficiency analysis. Through extensive evaluation of six compression techniques on modern LLMs across more than 40 datasets, we find that (i) compression exhibits a consistent knowledge bias, where knowledge-intensive tasks are relatively preserved while reasoning, multilingual, and instruction-following capabilities degrade substantially; (ii) quantization provides the best overall trade-off between retained performance and efficiency, whereas distillation yields strong runtime acceleration gains at high computational cost; and (iii) task-specific calibration can significantly improve the reasoning ability of pruned models by up to 50%.
Related papers
- KARL: Knowledge Agents via Reinforcement Learning [63.627906947205624]
We present a system for training enterprise search agents via reinforcement learning.<n> KARLBench is a multi-capability evaluation suite spanning six distinct search regimes.<n>We show that models trained across heterogeneous search behaviors generalize substantially better than those optimized for any single benchmark.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-03-05T14:30:25Z) - Towards Efficient Large Language Reasoning Models via Extreme-Ratio Chain-of-Thought Compression [55.63153956934198]
Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning successfully enhances the reasoning capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs)<n>Existing CoT compression methods often suffer from a critical loss of logical fidelity at high compression ratios.<n>We propose a novel EXTreme-RAtio Chain-of-Thought Compression framework, termed Extra-CoT, which aggressively reduces the token budget while preserving answer accuracy.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-09T06:57:15Z) - A Systematic Study of Compression Ordering for Large Language Models [0.5926203312586109]
This study systematically examines how knowledge distillation, structured pruning, and low-bit quantization perform when applied to the Qwen2.5 3B model.<n>Experiments show that quantization provides the greatest standalone compression, while pruning introduces moderate quality degradation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-11-23T12:46:56Z) - Information Capacity: Evaluating the Efficiency of Large Language Models via Text Compression [53.39128997308138]
We introduce information capacity, a measure of model efficiency based on text compression performance.<n> Empirical evaluations on mainstream open-source models show that models of varying sizes within a series exhibit consistent information capacity.<n>A distinctive feature of information capacity is that it incorporates tokenizer efficiency, which affects both input and output token counts.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-11-11T10:07:32Z) - EfficientLLM: Efficiency in Large Language Models [64.3537131208038]
Large Language Models (LLMs) have driven significant progress, yet their growing counts and context windows incur prohibitive compute, energy, and monetary costs.<n>We introduce EfficientLLM, a novel benchmark and the first comprehensive empirical study evaluating efficiency techniques for LLMs at scale.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-20T02:27:08Z) - Feature Alignment-Based Knowledge Distillation for Efficient Compression of Large Language Models [4.737806982257592]
This study proposes a knowledge distillation algorithm based on large language models and feature alignment.<n>The proposed model performs very close to the state-of-the-art GPT-4 model in terms of evaluation indicators such as perplexity, BLEU, ROUGE, and CER.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-12-27T04:37:06Z) - LLMC: Benchmarking Large Language Model Quantization with a Versatile Compression Toolkit [55.73370804397226]
Quantization, a key compression technique, can effectively mitigate these demands by compressing and accelerating large language models.
We present LLMC, a plug-and-play compression toolkit, to fairly and systematically explore the impact of quantization.
Powered by this versatile toolkit, our benchmark covers three key aspects: calibration data, algorithms (three strategies), and data formats.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-09T11:49:05Z) - Decoding Compressed Trust: Scrutinizing the Trustworthiness of Efficient LLMs Under Compression [109.23761449840222]
This study conducts the first, thorough evaluation of leading Large Language Models (LLMs)
We find that quantization is currently a more effective approach than pruning in achieving efficiency and trustworthiness simultaneously.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-18T01:38:19Z) - L3 Ensembles: Lifelong Learning Approach for Ensemble of Foundational
Language Models [15.726224465017596]
We propose an approach that focuses on extracting meaningful representations from unseen data and constructing a structured knowledge base.
We conducted experiments on various NLP tasks to validate its effectiveness, including benchmarks like GLUE and SuperGLUE.
The proposed L3 ensemble method increases the model accuracy by 4% 36% compared to the fine-tuned FLM.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-11T06:59:50Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.