Hybrid Responsible AI-Stochastic Approach for SLA Compliance in Multivendor 6G Networks

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.09841v1
• Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2026 14:45:59 GMT
• Title: Hybrid Responsible AI-Stochastic Approach for SLA Compliance in Multivendor 6G Networks
• Abstract summary: This paper presents a hybrid responsible AI-stochastic learning framework that embeds fairness, robustness, and auditability directly into the network control loop.<n>An RAAP continuously records AI-driven decision trajectories and produces user-level SLA summaries and operator-level responsibility analytics.<n> Experimental evaluations on synthetic two-class multigroup datasets demonstrate that the proposed hybrid model improves the accuracy of the worst group by up to 10.5%.
• Score: 1.8219577154655007
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: The convergence of AI and 6G network automation introduces new challenges in maintaining transparency, fairness, and accountability across multivendor management systems. Although closed-loop AI orchestration improves adaptability and self-optimization, it also creates a responsibility gap, where violations of SLAs cannot be causally attributed to specific agents or vendors. This paper presents a hybrid responsible AI-stochastic learning framework that embeds fairness, robustness, and auditability directly into the network control loop. The framework integrates RAI games with stochastic optimization, enabling dynamic adversarial reweighting and probabilistic exploration across heterogeneous vendor domains. An RAAP continuously records AI-driven decision trajectories and produces dual accountability reports: user-level SLA summaries and operator-level responsibility analytics. Experimental evaluations on synthetic two-class multigroup datasets demonstrate that the proposed hybrid model improves the accuracy of the worst group by up to 10.5\%. Specifically, hybrid RAI achieved a WGAcc of 60.5\% and an AvgAcc of 72.7\%, outperforming traditional RAI-GA (50.0\%) and ERM (21.5\%). The audit mechanism successfully traced 99\% simulated SLA violations to the AI entities responsible, producing both vendor and agent-level accountability indices. These results confirm that the proposed hybrid approach enhances fairness and robustness as well as establishes a concrete accountability framework for autonomous SLA assurance in multivendor 6G networks.

Related papers

• A Self-Calibrating Agentic AI Framework for Autonomous Edge Resource Allocation [2.131323683158522]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed as autonomous agents, transitioning from static conversational interfaces to dynamic systems capable of complex reasoning, tool execution, and decision-making.<n>We propose and experimentally evaluate an agentic AI framework, designed to enforce autonomous integrity within LLM-driven systems.<n>We design a self-calibration mechanism that mitigates drift and dynamically approximates ground truth by incorporating an ARIMA forecaster, without requiring continuous human oversight.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-24T15:21:54Z)
• SEAL: An Open, Auditable, and Fair Data Generation Framework for AI-Native 6G Networks [17.028162341456373]
  6G networks promise to transform the telecom industry by enabling dynamic resource allocation, predictive maintenance, and ultra-reliable low-latency communications.<n>However, the deployment of 6G systems results in severe data scarcity, hindering the training of efficient AI models.<n>We propose the Synthetic Data Generation with Ethics Audit Loop (SEAL) framework, which extends baseline pipelines with an Ethical and Regulatory Compliance by Design (ERCD) module and a Federated Learning (FL) feedback system.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-02T15:03:24Z)
• Red-MIRROR: Agentic LLM-based Autonomous Penetration Testing with Reflective Verification and Knowledge-augmented Interaction [0.42222053626544365]
  This paper proposes Red-MIRROR, a novel multi-agent automated penetration testing system.<n>Red-MIRROR introduces a tightly coupled memory-reflection backbone to explicitly govern inter-agent reasoning.<n> Empirical evaluation on the XBOW benchmark and Vulhub CVEs shows that Red-MIRROR achieves performance comparable to state-of-the-art agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-28T04:34:09Z)
• ComAgent: Multi-LLM based Agentic AI Empowered Intelligent Wireless Networks [62.031889234230725]
  6G networks rely on complex cross-layer optimization.<n> manually translating high-level intents into mathematical formulations remains a bottleneck.<n>We present ComAgent, a multi-LLM agentic AI framework.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-27T13:43:59Z)
• An Agentic Framework with LLMs for Solving Complex Vehicle Routing Problems [66.60904891478687]
  We propose an Agentic Framework with LLMs (AFL) for solving complex vehicle routing problems.<n>AFL directly extracts knowledge from raw inputs and enables self-contained code generation.<n>We show that AFL substantially outperforms existing LLM-based baselines in both code reliability and solution feasibility.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-19T03:59:25Z)
• Leveraging AI Agents for Autonomous Networks: A Reference Architecture and Empirical Studies [18.534083337294188]
  This work bridges the gap between architectural theory and operational reality by implementing Joseph Sifakis's AN Agent reference architecture in a functional cognitive system.<n>We demonstrate sub-10 ms real-time control in 5G NR sub-6 GHz while achieving 6% higher downlink throughput than Outer Loop Link Adaptation (OLLA) algorithms.<n>These improvements confirm the architecture's viability in overcoming traditional autonomy barriers and advancing critical L4-enabling capabilities toward next-generation objectives.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-10T06:24:57Z)
• OmniEAR: Benchmarking Agent Reasoning in Embodied Tasks [52.87238755666243]
  We present OmniEAR, a framework for evaluating how language models reason about physical interactions, tool usage, and multi-agent coordination in embodied tasks.<n>We model continuous physical properties and complex spatial relationships across 1,500 scenarios spanning household and industrial domains.<n>Our systematic evaluation reveals severe performance degradation when models must reason from constraints.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-07T17:54:15Z)
• Symbiotic Agents: A Novel Paradigm for Trustworthy AGI-driven Networks [1.5684305805304426]
  Large Language Model (LLM)-based autonomous agents are expected to play a vital role in the evolution of 6G networks.<n>We introduce a novel agentic paradigm that combines LLMs real-time optimization algorithms towards Trustworthy AI.<n>We propose an end-to-end architecture for AGI networks and evaluate it on a 5G testbed capturing channel fluctuations from moving vehicles.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-23T17:01:23Z)
• SEEA-R1: Tree-Structured Reinforcement Fine-Tuning for Self-Evolving Embodied Agents [58.174206358223415]
  Self-Evolving Embodied Agents-R1, or SEEA-R1, is the first reinforcement fine-tuning framework designed for self-evolving embodied agents.<n>We show that SEEA-R1 can support autonomous adaptation and reward-driven self-evolution.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-26T18:00:07Z)
• AI-Driven IRM: Transforming insider risk management with adaptive scoring and LLM-based threat detection [0.31457219084519]
  Insider threats pose a significant challenge to organizational security.<n>IRM system integrates behavioral analytics, dynamic risk scoring, and real-time policy enforcement.<n>System reduces false positives by 59% and improves true positive detection rates by 30%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-01T18:41:00Z)
• Retrieval is Not Enough: Enhancing RAG Reasoning through Test-Time Critique and Optimization [58.390885294401066]
  Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) has become a widely adopted paradigm for enabling knowledge-grounded large language models (LLMs)<n>RAG pipelines often fail to ensure that model reasoning remains consistent with the evidence retrieved, leading to factual inconsistencies or unsupported conclusions.<n>We propose AlignRAG, a novel iterative framework grounded in Critique-Driven Alignment (CDA)<n>We introduce AlignRAG-auto, an autonomous variant that dynamically terminates refinement, removing the need to pre-specify the number of critique iterations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-21T04:56:47Z)
• Closing the Responsibility Gap in AI-based Network Management: An Intelligent Audit System Approach [0.0]
  Existing network paradigms have achieved lower downtime as well as a higher Quality of Experience (QoE) through the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI)-based network management tools.<n>These AI management tools, allow for automatic responses to changes in network conditions, lowering operation costs for operators, and improving overall performance.<n>While adopting AI-based management tools enhance the overall network performance, it also introduce challenges such as removing human supervision, privacy violations, algorithmic bias, and model inaccuracies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-08T15:30:25Z)
• Towards Bridging the FL Performance-Explainability Trade-Off: A Trustworthy 6G RAN Slicing Use-Case [0.5156484100374059]
  6G network slicing requires highly performing AI models for efficient resource allocation and explainable decision-making. This paper presents a novel explanation-guided in-hoc federated learning (FL) approach. We quantitatively validate the faithfulness of the explanations via the so-called attribution-based confidence metric.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-24T15:51:06Z)
• Enabling AI-Generated Content (AIGC) Services in Wireless Edge Networks [68.00382171900975]
  In wireless edge networks, the transmission of incorrectly generated content may unnecessarily consume network resources. We present the AIGC-as-a-service concept and discuss the challenges in deploying A at the edge networks. We propose a deep reinforcement learning-enabled algorithm for optimal ASP selection.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-09T09:30:23Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.