AI-Driven IRM: Transforming insider risk management with adaptive scoring and LLM-based threat detection

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2505.03796v1
• Date: Thu, 01 May 2025 18:41:00 GMT
• Title: AI-Driven IRM: Transforming insider risk management with adaptive scoring and LLM-based threat detection
• Authors: Lokesh Koli, Shubham Kalra, Rohan Thakur, Anas Saifi, Karanpreet Singh,
• Abstract summary: Insider threats pose a significant challenge to organizational security.<n>IRM system integrates behavioral analytics, dynamic risk scoring, and real-time policy enforcement.<n>System reduces false positives by 59% and improves true positive detection rates by 30%.
• Score: 0.31457219084519
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Insider threats pose a significant challenge to organizational security, often evading traditional rule-based detection systems due to their subtlety and contextual nature. This paper presents an AI-powered Insider Risk Management (IRM) system that integrates behavioral analytics, dynamic risk scoring, and real-time policy enforcement to detect and mitigate insider threats with high accuracy and adaptability. We introduce a hybrid scoring mechanism - transitioning from the static PRISM model to an adaptive AI-based model utilizing an autoencoder neural network trained on expert-annotated user activity data. Through iterative feedback loops and continuous learning, the system reduces false positives by 59% and improves true positive detection rates by 30%, demonstrating substantial gains in detection precision. Additionally, the platform scales efficiently, processing up to 10 million log events daily with sub-300ms query latency, and supports automated enforcement actions for policy violations, reducing manual intervention. The IRM system's deployment resulted in a 47% reduction in incident response times, highlighting its operational impact. Future enhancements include integrating explainable AI, federated learning, graph-based anomaly detection, and alignment with Zero Trust principles to further elevate its adaptability, transparency, and compliance-readiness. This work establishes a scalable and proactive framework for mitigating emerging insider risks in both on-premises and hybrid environments.

Related papers

• Beyond Benchmarks: Dynamic, Automatic And Systematic Red-Teaming Agents For Trustworthy Medical Language Models [87.66870367661342]
  Large language models (LLMs) are used in AI applications in healthcare.<n>Red-teaming framework that continuously stress-test LLMs can reveal significant weaknesses in four safety-critical domains.<n>A suite of adversarial agents is applied to autonomously mutate test cases, identify/evolve unsafe-triggering strategies, and evaluate responses.<n>Our framework delivers an evolvable, scalable, and reliable safeguard for the next generation of medical AI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-30T08:44:22Z)
• AI/ML Life Cycle Management for Interoperable AI Native RAN [50.61227317567369]
  Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) models are rapidly permeating the 5G Radio Access Network (RAN)<n>These developments lay the foundation for AI-native transceivers as a key enabler for 6G.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-24T16:04:59Z)
• Expert-in-the-Loop Systems with Cross-Domain and In-Domain Few-Shot Learning for Software Vulnerability Detection [38.083049237330826]
  This study explores the use of Large Language Models (LLMs) in software vulnerability assessment by simulating the identification of Python code with known Common Weaknessions (CWEs)<n>Our results indicate that while zero-shot prompting performs poorly, few-shot prompting significantly enhances classification performance.<n> challenges such as model reliability, interpretability, and adversarial robustness remain critical areas for future research.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-11T18:43:51Z)
• Active Test-time Vision-Language Navigation [60.69722522420299]
  ATENA is a test-time active learning framework that enables a practical human-robot interaction via episodic feedback on uncertain navigation outcomes.<n>In particular, ATENA learns to increase certainty in successful episodes and decrease it in failed ones, improving uncertainty calibration.<n>In addition, we propose a self-active learning strategy that enables an agent to evaluate its navigation outcomes based on confident predictions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-07T02:24:44Z)
• Real-Time Detection of Insider Threats Using Behavioral Analytics and Deep Evidential Clustering [0.0]
  We propose a novel framework for real-time detection of insider threats using behavioral analytics combined with deep evidential clustering.<n>Our system captures and analyzes user activities, applies context-rich behavioral features, and classifies potential threats.<n>We evaluate our framework on benchmark insider threat datasets such as CERT and TWOS, achieving an average detection accuracy of 94.7% and a 38% reduction in false positives compared to traditional clustering methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-21T11:21:33Z)
• Safety Devolution in AI Agents [56.482973617087254]
  This study investigates how expanding retrieval access affects model reliability, bias propagation, and harmful content generation.<n>Retrieval-augmented agents built on aligned LLMs often behave more unsafely than uncensored models without retrieval.<n>These findings underscore the need for robust mitigation strategies to ensure fairness and reliability in retrieval-augmented and increasingly autonomous AI systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-20T11:21:40Z)
• Predicting Driver's Perceived Risk: a Model Based on Semi-Supervised Learning Strategy [7.227510169013427]
  Driver's subjective perceived risk (DSPR) model is proposed, regarding perceived risk as a dynamically triggered mechanism with anisotropy and attenuation.<n>20 participants are recruited for a driver-in-the-loop experiment to report their real-time subjective risk ratings (SRRs) when experiencing various automatic driving scenarios.<n>DSPR achieves the highest prediction accuracy of 87.91% in predicting SRRs, compared to three state-of-the-art risk models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-17T05:50:33Z)
• AILuminate: Introducing v1.0 of the AI Risk and Reliability Benchmark from MLCommons [62.374792825813394]
  This paper introduces AILuminate v1.0, the first comprehensive industry-standard benchmark for assessing AI-product risk and reliability.<n>The benchmark evaluates an AI system's resistance to prompts designed to elicit dangerous, illegal, or undesirable behavior in 12 hazard categories.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-19T05:58:52Z)
• Anomaly Detection for Incident Response at Scale [1.284857579394658]
  We present a machine learning-based anomaly detection product that monitors Walmart's business and system health in real-time. During the validation over 3 months, the product served predictions from over 3000 models to more than 25 application, platform, and operation teams. AIDR has achieved success with various internal teams with lower time to detection and fewer false positives than previous methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-24T00:46:19Z)
• FaultGuard: A Generative Approach to Resilient Fault Prediction in Smart Electrical Grids [53.2306792009435]
  FaultGuard is the first framework for fault type and zone classification resilient to adversarial attacks. We propose a low-complexity fault prediction model and an online adversarial training technique to enhance robustness. Our model outclasses the state-of-the-art for resilient fault prediction benchmarking, with an accuracy of up to 0.958.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-26T08:51:23Z)
• A Zero Trust Framework for Realization and Defense Against Generative AI Attacks in Power Grid [62.91192307098067]
  This paper proposes a novel zero trust framework for a power grid supply chain (PGSC) It facilitates early detection of potential GenAI-driven attack vectors, assessment of tail risk-based stability measures, and mitigation of such threats. Experimental results show that the proposed zero trust framework achieves an accuracy of 95.7% on attack vector generation, a risk measure of 9.61% for a 95% stable PGSC, and a 99% confidence in defense against GenAI-driven attack.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-11T02:47:21Z)
• An Unbiased Transformer Source Code Learning with Semantic Vulnerability Graph [3.3598755777055374]
  Current vulnerability screening techniques are ineffective at identifying novel vulnerabilities or providing developers with code vulnerability and classification. To address these issues, we propose a joint multitasked unbiased vulnerability classifier comprising a transformer "RoBERTa" and graph convolution neural network (GCN) We present a training process utilizing a semantic vulnerability graph (SVG) representation from source code, created by integrating edges from a sequential flow, control flow, and data flow, as well as a novel flow dubbed Poacher Flow (PF)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-17T20:54:14Z)
• SOTIF Entropy: Online SOTIF Risk Quantification and Mitigation for Autonomous Driving [16.78084912175149]
  This paper proposes the "Self-Surveillance and Self-Adaption System" as a systematic approach to online minimize the SOTIF risk. The core of this system is the risk monitoring of the implemented artificial intelligence algorithms within the autonomous vehicles. The inherent perception algorithm risk and external collision risk are jointly quantified via SOTIF entropy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-08T05:02:12Z)
• Robust Regularization with Adversarial Labelling of Perturbed Samples [22.37046166576859]
  We propose Adversarial Labelling of Perturbed Samples (ALPS) as a regularization scheme. ALPS trains neural networks with synthetic samples formed by perturbing each authentic input sample towards another one along with an adversarially assigned label. Experiments on the SVHN, CIFAR-10, CIFAR-100 and Tiny-ImageNet datasets show that the ALPS has a state-of-the-art regularization performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-28T11:26:49Z)
• Certifiable Robustness to Adversarial State Uncertainty in Deep Reinforcement Learning [40.989393438716476]
  Deep Neural Network-based systems are now the state-of-the-art in many robotics tasks, but their application in safety-critical domains remains dangerous without formal guarantees on network robustness. Small perturbations to sensor inputs are often enough to change network-based decisions, which was recently shown to cause an autonomous vehicle to swerve into another lane. This work leverages research on certified adversarial robustness to develop an online certifiably robust for deep reinforcement learning algorithms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-11T21:36:13Z)
• Adversarial vs behavioural-based defensive AI with joint, continual and active learning: automated evaluation of robustness to deception, poisoning and concept drift [62.997667081978825]
  Recent advancements in Artificial Intelligence (AI) have brought new capabilities to behavioural analysis (UEBA) for cyber-security. In this paper, we present a solution to effectively mitigate this attack by improving the detection process and efficiently leveraging human expertise.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-01-13T13:54:36Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.