On the Use of a Large Language Model to Support the Conduction of a Systematic Mapping Study: A Brief Report from a Practitioner's View

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.10147v1
• Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2026 15:57:30 GMT
• Title: On the Use of a Large Language Model to Support the Conduction of a Systematic Mapping Study: A Brief Report from a Practitioner's View
• Authors: Cauã Ferreira Barros, Marcos Kalinowski, Mohamad Kassab, Valdemar Vicente Graciano Neto,
• Abstract summary: Large Language Models (LLMs) can handle large volumes of textual data and support methods for evidence synthesis.<n>This paper presents an experience report on the conduction of a systematic mapping study with the support of LLMs.
• Score: 2.0199251985015434
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: The use of Large Language Models (LLMs) has drawn growing interest within the scientific community. LLMs can handle large volumes of textual data and support methods for evidence synthesis. Although recent studies highlight the potential of LLMs to accelerate screening and data extraction steps in systematic reviews, detailed reports of their practical application throughout the entire process remain scarce. This paper presents an experience report on the conduction of a systematic mapping study with the support of LLMs, describing the steps followed, the necessary adjustments, and the main challenges faced. Positive aspects are discussed, such as (i) the significant reduction of time in repetitive tasks and (ii) greater standardization in data extraction, as well as negative aspects, including (i) considerable effort to build reliable well-structured prompts, especially for less experienced users, since achieving effective prompts may require several iterations and testing, which can partially offset the expected time savings, (ii) the occurrence of hallucinations, and (iii) the need for constant manual verification. As a contribution, this work offers lessons learned and practical recommendations for researchers interested in adopting LLMs in systematic mappings and reviews, highlighting both efficiency gains and methodological risks and limitations to be considered.

Related papers

• Leveraging LLMs for Title and Abstract Screening for Systematic Review: A Cost-Effective Dynamic Few-Shot Learning Approach [4.746720136392869]
  We propose a two-stage dynamic few-shot learning approach to improve the efficiency and performance of large language models (LLMs) in the title and abstract screening task.<n>We evaluated this approach across 10 systematic reviews, and the results demonstrate its strong generalizability and cost-effectiveness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-12T03:51:54Z)
• LLM-Specific Utility: A New Perspective for Retrieval-Augmented Generation [110.610512800947]
  Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) enhances large language models (LLMs) by incorporating external knowledge.<n>Existing studies often treat utility as a generic attribute, ignoring the fact that different LLMs may benefit differently from the same passage.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-13T12:57:45Z)
• CARPAS: Towards Content-Aware Refinement of Provided Aspects for Summarization in Large Language Models [16.41705871316774]
  This paper introduces Content-Aware Refinement of Provided Aspects for Summarization (CARPAS)<n>We propose a preliminary subtask to predict the number of relevant aspects, and demonstrate that the predicted number can serve as effective guidance.<n>Our experiments show that the proposed approach significantly improves performance across all datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-08T16:16:46Z)
• How do Large Language Models Understand Relevance? A Mechanistic Interpretability Perspective [64.00022624183781]
  Large language models (LLMs) can assess relevance and support information retrieval (IR) tasks.<n>We investigate how different LLM modules contribute to relevance judgment through the lens of mechanistic interpretability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-10T16:14:55Z)
• Scaling Up Summarization: Leveraging Large Language Models for Long Text Extractive Summarization [0.27624021966289597]
  This paper introduces EYEGLAXS, a framework that leverages Large Language Models (LLMs) for extractive summarization. EYEGLAXS focuses on extractive summarization to ensure factual and grammatical integrity. The system sets new performance benchmarks on well-known datasets like PubMed and ArXiv.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-28T13:52:19Z)
• Can Long-Context Language Models Subsume Retrieval, RAG, SQL, and More? [54.667202878390526]
  Long-context language models (LCLMs) have the potential to revolutionize our approach to tasks traditionally reliant on external tools like retrieval systems or databases. We introduce LOFT, a benchmark of real-world tasks requiring context up to millions of tokens designed to evaluate LCLMs' performance on in-context retrieval and reasoning. Our findings reveal LCLMs' surprising ability to rival state-of-the-art retrieval and RAG systems, despite never having been explicitly trained for these tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-19T00:28:58Z)
• A Survey on Efficient Inference for Large Language Models [25.572035747669275]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have attracted extensive attention due to their remarkable performance across various tasks. The substantial computational and memory requirements of LLM inference pose challenges for deployment in resource-constrained scenarios. This paper presents a comprehensive survey of the existing literature on efficient LLM inference.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-22T15:53:08Z)
• Characterization of Large Language Model Development in the Datacenter [55.9909258342639]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have presented impressive performance across several transformative tasks. However, it is non-trivial to efficiently utilize large-scale cluster resources to develop LLMs. We present an in-depth characterization study of a six-month LLM development workload trace collected from our GPU datacenter Acme.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-12T13:31:14Z)
• Towards Modeling Learner Performance with Large Language Models [7.002923425715133]
  This paper investigates whether the pattern recognition and sequence modeling capabilities of LLMs can be extended to the domain of knowledge tracing. We compare two approaches to using LLMs for this task, zero-shot prompting and model fine-tuning, with existing, non-LLM approaches to knowledge tracing. While LLM-based approaches do not achieve state-of-the-art performance, fine-tuned LLMs surpass the performance of naive baseline models and perform on par with standard Bayesian Knowledge Tracing approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-29T14:06:34Z)
• C-ICL: Contrastive In-context Learning for Information Extraction [54.39470114243744]
  c-ICL is a novel few-shot technique that leverages both correct and incorrect sample constructions to create in-context learning demonstrations. Our experiments on various datasets indicate that c-ICL outperforms previous few-shot in-context learning methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-17T11:28:08Z)
• Had enough of experts? Quantitative knowledge retrieval from large language models [4.091195951668217]
  Large language models (LLMs) have been extensively studied for their abilities to generate convincing natural language sequences.<n>We introduce a framework that leverages LLMs to enhance Bayesian models by eliciting expert-like prior knowledge and imputing missing data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-12T16:32:37Z)
• Instruction Tuning for Large Language Models: A Survey [52.86322823501338]
  We make a systematic review of the literature, including the general methodology of supervised fine-tuning (SFT)<n>We also review the potential pitfalls of SFT along with criticism against it, along with efforts pointing out current deficiencies of existing strategies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-21T15:35:16Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.