Deriving and Validating Requirements Engineering Principles for Large-Scale Agile Development: An Industrial Longitudinal Study

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.10972v1
• Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2026 16:01:10 GMT
• Title: Deriving and Validating Requirements Engineering Principles for Large-Scale Agile Development: An Industrial Longitudinal Study
• Abstract summary: In large scale agile systems development, the lack of a unified requirements engineering process is a major challenge.<n>To address this challenge, we conducted a five year longitudinal case study with Grundfos AB.
• Score: 2.8007318122183182
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: In large scale agile systems development, the lack of a unified requirements engineering (RE) process is a major challenge, exacerbated by the absence of high level guiding principles for effective requirements management. To address this challenge, we conducted a five year longitudinal case study with Grundfos AB, in collaboration with the Software Centre in Sweden. RE principles were first derived through qualitative data collection spanning more than 25 sprints, approximately 320 weekly synchronisation meetings, and seven cross-company, company-specific workshops between 2019 and 2024. These activities engaged practitioners from diverse roles, representing several hundred developers across domains. In late 2024, five in depth focus groups with senior leaders at Grundfos provided retrospective validation of the principles and assessed their strategic impact. We aim to (1) empirically examine RE principles in large scale agile system development, (2) explore their benefits in practice within the case company, and (3) identify a set of transferable RE principles for large scale contexts. Using thematic analysis, six key RE principles architectural context, stakeholder-driven validation and alignment, requirements practices in large-scale agile organisations. evolution with lightweight documentation, delegated requirements management, organisational roles and responsibilities, and a shared understanding of requirements are derived. The study was further validated through crosscompany expert evaluation with three additional multinational organisations (Bosch, Ericsson, and Volvo Cars), which are directly responsible for largescale requirements management. Together, these efforts provide a scalable and adaptable foundation for improving requirements practices in largescale agile organisations.

Related papers

• LLawCo: Learning Laws of Cooperation for Modeling Embodied Multi-Agent Behavior [51.25229110468212]
  Embodied agents operating in decentralized environments often exhibit behaviors that are misaligned with their partners or inconsistent with the environment state.<n>We propose a novel framework, Learning Laws of Cooperation, that enables embodied agents to autonomously align with both their partners and task objectives.<n>Our framework allows agents to reflect on past failures to extract misaligned behavioral patterns, which are used to derive high-level behavioral laws, such as "Talk when necessary" and "Wait for partner"
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-26T15:26:12Z)
• Report on the Designing Accountable Software Systems Workshop [18.019209577424792]
  The workshop was conducted as a collaborative systematization of knowledge that culminated in several research directions.<n>The findings include the importance of clarifying definitions and responsibilities within accountable organizations.<n>Further research was identified as needed to study the ways to improve the translation of accountability structures into the software design process.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-01T19:22:02Z)
• Exploring the Vertical-Domain Reasoning Capabilities of Large Language Models [19.821219678322517]
  This study introduces the concept of vertical-domain accounting reasoning and establishes evaluation criteria.<n>We evaluate several representative models, including GLM-6B, GLM-130B, GLM-4, and OpenAI GPT-4, on a set of accounting reasoning tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-27T02:39:34Z)
• Benchmarking and Studying the LLM-based Agent System in End-to-End Software Development [33.01897134024342]
  Development of LLM-based autonomous agents for end-to-end software development represents a significant paradigm shift in software engineering.<n>This work provides the community with a more realistic benchmark, a comprehensive evaluation framework, and crucial insights into the current capabilities and core challenges of software development agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-06T05:10:04Z)
• Empowering Real-World: A Survey on the Technology, Practice, and Evaluation of LLM-driven Industry Agents [63.03252293761656]
  This paper systematically reviews the technologies, applications, and evaluation methods of industry agents based on large language models (LLMs)<n>We examine the three key technological pillars that support the advancement of agent capabilities: Memory, Planning, and Tool Use.<n>We provide an overview of the application of industry agents in real-world domains such as digital engineering, scientific discovery, embodied intelligence, collaborative business execution, and complex system simulation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-20T12:46:55Z)
• SEER: Sustainability Enhanced Engineering of Software Requirements [3.8168092489216385]
  We introduce SEER, a framework which addresses sustainability concerns in the early software development phase.<n>The framework operates in three stages: (i) it identifies sustainability requirements relevant to a specific software product from a general taxonomy; (ii) it evaluates how sustainable system requirements are based on the identified SRs; and (iii) it optimize system requirements that fail to satisfy any SR.<n>Results generated using Gemini 2.5 reasoning model demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed approach in accurately identifying a broad range of sustainability concerns across diverse domains.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-10T03:48:30Z)
• An Adaptive Responsible AI Governance Framework for Decentralized Organizations [1.172831654730204]
  This paper examines the assessment challenges of Responsible AI (RAI) governance efforts in globally decentralized organizations.<n>Our RAI assessment, conducted across multiple business units and AI use cases, reveals four key patterns that shape RAI implementation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-03T05:55:48Z)
• MCP-Universe: Benchmarking Large Language Models with Real-World Model Context Protocol Servers [86.00932417210477]
  We introduce MCP-Universe, the first comprehensive benchmark specifically designed to evaluate LLMs in realistic and hard tasks through interaction with real-world MCP servers.<n>Our benchmark encompasses 6 core domains spanning 11 different MCP servers: Location Navigation, Repository Management, Financial Analysis, 3D Design, Browser Automation, and Web Searching.<n>We find that even SOTA models such as GPT-5 (43.72%), Grok-4 (33.33%) and Claude-4.0-Sonnet (29.44%) exhibit significant performance limitations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-20T13:28:58Z)
• Agentic AI in 6G Software Businesses: A Layered Maturity Model [3.1882747895372217]
  Agentic AI systems promise increased autonomy, scalability, and intelligent decision-making across distributed environments.<n>Their adoption raises concerns regarding technical complexity, integration, organizational readiness, and performance-cost trade-offs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-05T12:42:46Z)
• Towards Agentic Recommender Systems in the Era of Multimodal Large Language Models [75.4890331763196]
  Recent breakthroughs in Large Language Models (LLMs) have led to the emergence of agentic AI systems.<n>LLM-based Agentic RS (LLM-ARS) can offer more interactive, context-aware, and proactive recommendations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-20T22:37:15Z)
• Exploring the Necessity of Reasoning in LLM-based Agent Scenarios [74.35956310688164]
  We propose the LaRMA framework, encompassing nine tasks across Tool Usage, Plan Design, and Problem Solving.<n>Our findings address four research questions: LRMs surpass LLMs in reasoning-intensive tasks like Plan Design, leveraging iterative reflection for superior outcomes.<n>LRMs' enhanced reasoning incurs higher computational costs, prolonged processing, and behavioral challenges, including overthinking and fact-ignoring tendencies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-14T04:34:31Z)
• A Survey on Post-training of Large Language Models [185.51013463503946]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have fundamentally transformed natural language processing, making them indispensable across domains ranging from conversational systems to scientific exploration.<n>These challenges necessitate advanced post-training language models (PoLMs) to address shortcomings, such as restricted reasoning capacities, ethical uncertainties, and suboptimal domain-specific performance.<n>This paper presents the first comprehensive survey of PoLMs, systematically tracing their evolution across five core paradigms: Fine-tuning, which enhances task-specific accuracy; Alignment, which ensures ethical coherence and alignment with human preferences; Reasoning, which advances multi-step inference despite challenges in reward design; Integration and Adaptation, which
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-08T05:41:42Z)
• SPRI: Aligning Large Language Models with Context-Situated Principles [53.07731637246485]
  Situated-PRInciples (SPRI) is designed to automatically generate guiding principles in real-time for each input query and utilize them to align each response.<n>We evaluate SPRI on three tasks, and show that SPRI can derive principles in a complex domain-specific task that leads to on-par performance as expert-crafted ones.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-05T17:32:29Z)
• Challenges and Practices in Aligning Requirements with Verification and Validation: A Case Study of Six Companies [10.508558932045032]
  Weak alignment of requirements engineering with verification and validation (VV) may lead to problems in delivering the required products in time with the right quality. We have performed a multi-unit case study to gain insight into issues around aligning RE and VV by interviewing 30 practitioners from 6 software developing companies. The results describe current industry challenges and practices in aligning RE with VV, ranging from quality of the individual RE and VV activities, through tracing and tools, to change control and sharing a common understanding at strategy, goal and design level.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-24T02:39:53Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.