LLawCo: Learning Laws of Cooperation for Modeling Embodied Multi-Agent Behavior

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.28182v1
• Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2026 15:26:12 GMT
• Title: LLawCo: Learning Laws of Cooperation for Modeling Embodied Multi-Agent Behavior
• Abstract summary: Embodied agents operating in decentralized environments often exhibit behaviors that are misaligned with their partners or inconsistent with the environment state.<n>We propose a novel framework, Learning Laws of Cooperation, that enables embodied agents to autonomously align with both their partners and task objectives.<n>Our framework allows agents to reflect on past failures to extract misaligned behavioral patterns, which are used to derive high-level behavioral laws, such as "Talk when necessary" and "Wait for partner"
• Score: 51.25229110468212
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Embodied agents operating in decentralized and partially observable environments have attracted growing attention in recent years. However, existing large language model (LLM)-based agents often exhibit behaviors that are misaligned with their partners or inconsistent with the environment state, leading to inefficient cooperation and poor task success. To address this challenge, we propose a novel framework, Learning Laws of Cooperation (LLawCo), that enables embodied agents to autonomously align with both their partners and task objectives. Our framework allows agents to reflect on past failures to extract misaligned behavioral patterns, which are used to derive high-level behavioral laws, such as "Talk when necessary" and "Wait for partner." These laws are explicitly incorporated into the agents' chains of thought via supervised fine-tuning, aligning their reasoning with task requirements and the behavior of other agents. To evaluate our approach, we introduce PARTNR-Dialog, a large-scale multi-agent communicative and cooperative planning benchmark built on the PARTNR environment. Experiments on existing tasks and our new benchmark demonstrate significant improvements in cooperative efficiency and task success rates. Across four backbone LLMs, our method achieves average success rate improvements of 4.5% on the PARTNR-Dialog benchmark and 6.8% on the TDW-MAT benchmark over state-of-the-art open-source communicative agent frameworks. See the LLawCo project page for details: https://www.merl.com/research/highlights/LLawCo

Related papers

• Evaluating Generalization Capabilities of LLM-Based Agents in Mixed-Motive Scenarios Using Concordia [100.74015791021044]
  Large Language Model (LLM) agents have demonstrated impressive capabilities for social interaction.<n>Existing evaluation methods fail to measure how well these capabilities generalize to novel social situations.<n>We present empirical results from the NeurIPS 2024 Concordia Contest, where agents were evaluated on their ability to achieve mutual gains.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-03T00:11:05Z)
• Learning "Partner-Aware" Collaborators in Multi-Party Collaboration [12.287537011305497]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly bring deployed in agentic settings where they act as collaborators with humans.<n>This paper builds on the AI alignment and safe interruptability literature to offer novel theoretical insights on collaborative behavior.<n>We propose Interruptible Collaborative Roleplayer (ICR)-a novel partner-aware learning algorithm to train CG-optimal collaborators.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-26T00:05:48Z)
• ReMA: Learning to Meta-think for LLMs with Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning [53.817538122688944]
  We introduce Reinforced Meta-thinking Agents (ReMA) to elicit meta-thinking behaviors from Reasoning of Large Language Models (LLMs)<n>ReMA decouples the reasoning process into two hierarchical agents: a high-level meta-thinking agent responsible for generating strategic oversight and plans, and a low-level reasoning agent for detailed executions.<n> Empirical results from single-turn experiments demonstrate that ReMA outperforms single-agent RL baselines on complex reasoning tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-12T16:05:31Z)
• MultiAgentBench: Evaluating the Collaboration and Competition of LLM agents [59.825725526176655]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown remarkable capabilities as autonomous agents.<n>Existing benchmarks either focus on single-agent tasks or are confined to narrow domains, failing to capture the dynamics of multi-agent coordination and competition.<n>We introduce MultiAgentBench, a benchmark designed to evaluate LLM-based multi-agent systems across diverse, interactive scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-03T05:18:50Z)
• Leveraging Large Language Models for Effective and Explainable Multi-Agent Credit Assignment [4.406086834602686]
  We show how to reformulate credit assignment to the two pattern recognition problems of sequence improvement and attribution.<n>Our approach utilizes a centralized reward-critic which numerically decomposes the environment reward based on the individual contribution of each agent.<n>Both our methods far outperform the state-of-the-art on a variety of benchmarks, including Level-Based Foraging, Robotic Warehouse, and our new Spaceworld benchmark which incorporates collision-related safety constraints.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-24T05:56:47Z)
• LLM-Coordination: Evaluating and Analyzing Multi-agent Coordination Abilities in Large Language Models [23.092480882456048]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated emergent common-sense reasoning and Theory of Mind (ToM) capabilities.<n>This study introduces the LLM-Coordination Benchmark, a novel benchmark for analyzing LLMs in the context of Pure Coordination Settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-05T21:18:15Z)
• Cooperation, Competition, and Maliciousness: LLM-Stakeholders Interactive Negotiation [52.930183136111864]
  We propose using scorable negotiation to evaluate Large Language Models (LLMs) To reach an agreement, agents must have strong arithmetic, inference, exploration, and planning capabilities. We provide procedures to create new games and increase games' difficulty to have an evolving benchmark.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-29T13:33:06Z)
• ProAgent: Building Proactive Cooperative Agents with Large Language Models [89.53040828210945]
  ProAgent is a novel framework that harnesses large language models to create proactive agents. ProAgent can analyze the present state, and infer the intentions of teammates from observations. ProAgent exhibits a high degree of modularity and interpretability, making it easily integrated into various coordination scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-22T10:36:56Z)
• Towards Few-shot Coordination: Revisiting Ad-hoc Teamplay Challenge In the Game of Hanabi [15.917861586043813]
  We show that state-of-the-art ZSC algorithms have poor performance when paired with agents trained with different learning methods. We create a framework based on a popular cooperative multi-agent game called Hanabi to evaluate the adaptability of MARL methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-20T14:44:50Z)
• Iterated Reasoning with Mutual Information in Cooperative and Byzantine Decentralized Teaming [0.0]
  We show that reformulating an agent's policy to be conditional on the policies of its teammates inherently maximizes Mutual Information (MI) lower-bound when optimizing under Policy Gradient (PG) Our approach, InfoPG, outperforms baselines in learning emergent collaborative behaviors and sets the state-of-the-art in decentralized cooperative MARL tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-20T22:54:32Z)
• Modeling the Interaction between Agents in Cooperative Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning [2.9360071145551068]
  We propose a novel cooperative MARL algorithm named as interactive actor-critic(IAC) IAC models the interaction of agents from perspectives of policy and value function. We extend the value decomposition methods to continuous control tasks and evaluate IAC on benchmark tasks including classic control and multi-agent particle environments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-10T01:58:28Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.