Understanding Persuasive Interactions between Generative Social Agents and Humans: The Knowledge-based Persuasion Model (KPM)

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.11483v1
• Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2026 01:53:28 GMT
• Title: Understanding Persuasive Interactions between Generative Social Agents and Humans: The Knowledge-based Persuasion Model (KPM)
• Abstract summary: Generative social agents (GSAs) use artificial intelligence to autonomously communicate with human users.<n>We propose the Knowledge-based Persuasion Model (KPM) as a novel theoretical framework.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Generative social agents (GSAs) use artificial intelligence to autonomously communicate with human users in a natural and adaptive manner. Currently, there is a lack of theorizing regarding interactions with GSAs, and likewise, few guidelines exist for studying how they influence user attitudes and behaviors. Consequently, we propose the Knowledge-based Persuasion Model (KPM) as a novel theoretical framework. According to the KPM, a GSA's self, user, and context-related knowledge drives its persuasive behavior, which in turn shapes the attitudes and behaviors of a responding human user. By synthesizing existing research, the model offers a structured approach to studying interactions with GSAs, supporting the development of agents that motivate rather than manipulate humans. Accordingly, the KPM encourages the integration of responsible GSAs that adhere to social norms and ethical standards with the goal of increasing user wellbeing. Implications of the KPM for research and application domains such as healthcare and education are discussed.

Related papers

• Reclaiming Epistemic Agency: A Critical Framework for Human-Generative AI Co-Agency in Education [0.0]
  This paper presents a conceptual evaluation of the extent to which students and teachers act in classrooms to produce knowledge, validate each other's claims, and redistribute evidence of student learning while collaborating with and competing against humans.<n>This evaluation draws on various theoretical paradigms, including Distributed Agency, Self-Determination Theory, Society 5.0, and Technology Integration Paradigms.<n>This paper introduces the Ecological Co-Agency Framework, which defines agency in terms of relational, regulatory, and pedagogical processes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-27T10:39:29Z)
• What Drives Students' Use of AI Chatbots? Technology Acceptance in Conversational AI [0.17188280334580194]
  We examine how perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use relate to students' behavioral intention to use conversational AI.<n>We find perceived usefulness remains the strongest predictor of students' intention to use conversational AI.<n>Trust and subjective norms significantly influence perceptions of usefulness, while perceived enjoyment exerts both a direct and indirect effect on usage intentions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-24T05:00:41Z)
• MoltNet: Understanding Social Behavior of AI Agents in the Agent-Native MoltBook [26.126469624250916]
  MoltNet is a large-scale empirical analysis of agent interaction on MoltBook.<n>We examine behavior along four dimensions: intent and motivation, norms and templates, incentives and behavioral drift, emotion and contagion.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-13T21:03:59Z)
• Never say never: Exploring the effects of available knowledge on agent persuasiveness in controlled physiotherapy motivation dialogues [0.0]
  We studied persuasive ChatGPT-generated messages in the context of human-robot physiotherapy motivation.<n>Our findings indicate that LLM-based GSAs can adapt assertive and expressive personality traits.<n>The study highlights the importance of empirically studying behavioral patterns of GSAs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-13T13:28:55Z)
• The Rise of AI Agent Communities: Large-Scale Analysis of Discourse and Interaction on Moltbook [62.2627874717318]
  Moltbook is a Reddit-like social platform where AI agents create posts and interact with other agents through comments and replies.<n>Using a public API snapshot collected about five days after launch, we address three research questions: what AI agents discuss, how they post, and how they interact.<n>We show that agents' writing is predominantly neutral, with positivity appearing in community engagement and assistance-oriented content.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-13T05:28:31Z)
• AI Agent Behavioral Science [29.262537008412412]
  AI Agent Behavioral Science focuses on the systematic observation of behavior, design of interventions to test hypotheses, and theory-guided interpretation of how AI agents act, adapt, and interact over time.<n>We systematize a growing body of research across individual agent, multi-agent, and human-agent interaction settings, and demonstrate how this perspective informs responsible AI by treating fairness, safety, interpretability, accountability, and privacy as behavioral properties.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-04T08:12:32Z)
• Media and responsible AI governance: a game-theoretic and LLM analysis [61.132523071109354]
  This paper investigates the interplay between AI developers, regulators, users, and the media in fostering trustworthy AI systems.<n>Using evolutionary game theory and large language models (LLMs), we model the strategic interactions among these actors under different regulatory regimes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-12T21:39:38Z)
• Emergence of human-like polarization among large language model agents [79.96817421756668]
  We simulate a networked system involving thousands of large language model agents, discovering their social interactions, result in human-like polarization.<n>Similarities between humans and LLM agents raise concerns about their capacity to amplify societal polarization, but also hold the potential to serve as a valuable testbed for identifying plausible strategies to mitigate polarization and its consequences.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-09T11:45:05Z)
• Persuasion with Large Language Models: a Survey [49.86930318312291]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have created new disruptive possibilities for persuasive communication. In areas such as politics, marketing, public health, e-commerce, and charitable giving, such LLM Systems have already achieved human-level or even super-human persuasiveness. Our survey suggests that the current and future potential of LLM-based persuasion poses profound ethical and societal risks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-11T10:05:52Z)
• Agent Teaming Situation Awareness (ATSA): A Situation Awareness Framework for Human-AI Teaming [10.712812672157611]
  We provide a review of leading SA theoretical models and a new framework for SA in the HAT context. The Agent Teaming Situation Awareness (ATSA) framework unifies human and AI behavior, and involves bidirectional, and dynamic interaction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-31T15:02:01Z)
• Aligning to Social Norms and Values in Interactive Narratives [89.82264844526333]
  We focus on creating agents that act in alignment with socially beneficial norms and values in interactive narratives or text-based games. We introduce the GALAD agent that uses the social commonsense knowledge present in specially trained language models to contextually restrict its action space to only those actions that are aligned with socially beneficial values.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-04T09:54:33Z)
• Can You be More Social? Injecting Politeness and Positivity into Task-Oriented Conversational Agents [60.27066549589362]
  Social language used by human agents is associated with greater users' responsiveness and task completion. The model uses a sequence-to-sequence deep learning architecture, extended with a social language understanding element. Evaluation in terms of content preservation and social language level using both human judgment and automatic linguistic measures shows that the model can generate responses that enable agents to address users' issues in a more socially appropriate way.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-29T08:22:48Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.