Differentiable Modal Logic for Multi-Agent Diagnosis, Orchestration and Communication

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.12083v1
• Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2026 15:39:18 GMT
• Title: Differentiable Modal Logic for Multi-Agent Diagnosis, Orchestration and Communication
• Authors: Antonin Sulc,
• Abstract summary: This tutorial demonstrates differentiable modal logic (DML), implemented via Modal Logical Neural Networks (MLNNs)<n>We present a unified neurosymbolic debug framework through four modalities: epistemic (who to trust), temporal (when events cause failures), deontic (what actions are permitted) and doxastic (how to interpret agent confidence)<n>Key contributions for the neurosymbolic community: (1) interpretable learned structures where trust and causality are explicit parameters, not opaque embeddings; (2) knowledge injection via differentiable axioms that guide learning with sparse data; and (4) practical deployment patterns for monitoring, active control and communication of
• Score: 0.15229257192293197
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: As multi-agent AI systems evolve from simple chatbots to autonomous swarms, debugging semantic failures requires reasoning about knowledge, belief, causality, and obligation, precisely what modal logic was designed to formalize. However, traditional modal logic requires manual specification of relationship structures that are unknown or dynamic in real systems. This tutorial demonstrates differentiable modal logic (DML), implemented via Modal Logical Neural Networks (MLNNs), enabling systems to learn trust networks, causal chains, and regulatory boundaries from behavioral data alone. We present a unified neurosymbolic debugging framework through four modalities: epistemic (who to trust), temporal (when events cause failures), deontic (what actions are permitted), and doxastic (how to interpret agent confidence). Each modality is demonstrated on concrete multi-agent scenarios, from discovering deceptive alliances in diplomacy games to detecting LLM hallucinations, with complete implementations showing how logical contradictions become learnable optimization objectives. Key contributions for the neurosymbolic community: (1) interpretable learned structures where trust and causality are explicit parameters, not opaque embeddings; (2) knowledge injection via differentiable axioms that guide learning with sparse data (3) compositional multi-modal reasoning that combines epistemic, temporal, and deontic constraints; and (4) practical deployment patterns for monitoring, active control and communication of multi-agent systems. All code provided as executable Jupyter notebooks.

Related papers

• Modal Logical Neural Networks [0.15229257192293197]
  We propose Modal Logical Neural Networks (MLNNs), a neurosymbolic framework that integrates deep learning with the formal semantics of modal logic.<n>We show how enforcing or learning accessibility can increase logical consistency and interpretability without changing the underlying task architecture.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-03T06:38:29Z)
• Bridging Symbolic Control and Neural Reasoning in LLM Agents: The Structured Cognitive Loop [0.0]
  We introduce Structured Cognitive Loop (SCL), a modular architecture that separates agent cognition into five phases: Retrieval, Cognition, Control, Action, and Memory (R-CCAM)<n>At the core of SCL is Soft Symbolic Control, an adaptive governance mechanism that applies symbolic constraints to probabilistic inference.<n>We provide a complete open-source implementation demonstrating the R-CCAM loop architecture, alongside a live GPT-4o-powered travel planning agent.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-21T05:19:34Z)
• Agentic System with Modal Logic for Autonomous Diagnostics [0.3437656066916039]
  We argue that scaling the structure, fidelity, and logical consistency of agent reasoning is a crucial, yet underexplored, dimension of AI research.<n>This paper introduces a neuro-symbolic multi-agent architecture where the belief states of individual agents are formally represented as Kripke models.<n>In this work, we use immutable, domain-specific knowledge to make an informed root cause diagnosis, which is encoded as logical constraints essential for proper, reliable, and explainable diagnosis.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-15T14:03:06Z)
• CALM: Contextual Analog Logic with Multimodality [9.763339269757227]
  We introduce Contextual Analog Logic with Multimodality (CALM)<n>CALM unites symbolic reasoning with neural generation.<n>It enables systems to make context-sensitive decisions grounded in real-world multi-modal data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-17T19:40:32Z)
• LogiDynamics: Unraveling the Dynamics of Inductive, Abductive and Deductive Logical Inferences in LLM Reasoning [74.0242521818214]
  This paper systematically investigates the comparative dynamics of inductive (System 1) versus abductive/deductive (System 2) inference in large language models (LLMs)<n>We utilize a controlled analogical reasoning environment, varying modality (textual, visual, symbolic), difficulty, and task format (MCQ / free-text)<n>Our analysis reveals System 2 pipelines generally excel, particularly in visual/symbolic modalities and harder tasks, while System 1 is competitive for textual and easier problems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-16T15:54:53Z)
• Failure Modes of LLMs for Causal Reasoning on Narratives [51.19592551510628]
  We investigate the interaction between world knowledge and logical reasoning.<n>We find that state-of-the-art large language models (LLMs) often rely on superficial generalizations.<n>We show that simple reformulations of the task can elicit more robust reasoning behavior.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-31T12:48:58Z)
• Interpretable Imitation Learning with Dynamic Causal Relations [65.18456572421702]
  We propose to expose captured knowledge in the form of a directed acyclic causal graph. We also design this causal discovery process to be state-dependent, enabling it to model the dynamics in latent causal graphs. The proposed framework is composed of three parts: a dynamic causal discovery module, a causality encoding module, and a prediction module, and is trained in an end-to-end manner.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-30T20:59:42Z)
• LOGICSEG: Parsing Visual Semantics with Neural Logic Learning and Reasoning [73.98142349171552]
  LOGICSEG is a holistic visual semantic that integrates neural inductive learning and logic reasoning with both rich data and symbolic knowledge. During fuzzy logic-based continuous relaxation, logical formulae are grounded onto data and neural computational graphs, hence enabling logic-induced network training. These designs together make LOGICSEG a general and compact neural-logic machine that is readily integrated into existing segmentation models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-24T05:43:19Z)
• Modeling Hierarchical Reasoning Chains by Linking Discourse Units and Key Phrases for Reading Comprehension [80.99865844249106]
  We propose a holistic graph network (HGN) which deals with context at both discourse level and word level, as the basis for logical reasoning. Specifically, node-level and type-level relations, which can be interpreted as bridges in the reasoning process, are modeled by a hierarchical interaction mechanism.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-21T07:34:27Z)
• Interpretable Multimodal Misinformation Detection with Logic Reasoning [40.851213962307206]
  We propose a novel logic-based neural model for multimodal misinformation detection. We parameterize symbolic logical elements using neural representations, which facilitate the automatic generation and evaluation of meaningful logic clauses. Results on three public datasets demonstrate the feasibility and versatility of our model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-10T08:16:36Z)
• Improving Coherence and Consistency in Neural Sequence Models with Dual-System, Neuro-Symbolic Reasoning [49.6928533575956]
  We use neural inference to mediate between the neural System 1 and the logical System 2. Results in robust story generation and grounded instruction-following show that this approach can increase the coherence and accuracy of neurally-based generations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-06T17:59:49Z)
• Reinforcement Learning with External Knowledge by using Logical Neural Networks [67.46162586940905]
  A recent neuro-symbolic framework called the Logical Neural Networks (LNNs) can simultaneously provide key-properties of both neural networks and symbolic logic. We propose an integrated method that enables model-free reinforcement learning from external knowledge sources.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-03T12:34:59Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.