SHAPR: A Solo Human-Centred and AI-Assisted Practice Framework for Research Software Development

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.12443v1
• Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2026 22:02:39 GMT
• Title: SHAPR: A Solo Human-Centred and AI-Assisted Practice Framework for Research Software Development
• Authors: Ka Ching Chan,
• Abstract summary: This paper proposes the SHAPR (Solo, Human-centred, AI-assisted PRactice) as a practice-level operational framework.<n>By explicitly linking research software development, Human-AI collaboration, and reflective learning, this study contributes to broader discussions on how SHAPR can support both knowledge production and HDR researcher training.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Research software has become a central vehicle for inquiry and learning in many Higher Degree Research (HDR) contexts, where solo researchers increasingly develop software-based artefacts as part of their research methodology. At the same time, generative artificial intelligence is reshaping development practice, offering powerful forms of assistance while introducing new challenges for accountability, reflection, and methodological rigour. Although Action Design Research (ADR) provides a well-established foundation for studying and constructing socio-technical artefacts, it offers limited guidance on how its principles can be operationalised in the day-to-day practice of solo, AI-assisted research software development. This paper proposes the SHAPR framework (Solo, Human-centred, AI-assisted PRactice) as a practice-level operational framework that complements ADR by translating its high-level principles into actionable guidance for contemporary research contexts. SHAPR supports the enactment of ADR Building-Intervention-Evaluation cycles by making explicit the roles, artefacts, reflective practices, and lightweight governance mechanisms required to sustain human accountability and learning in AI-assisted development. The contribution of the paper is conceptual: SHAPR itself is treated as the primary design artefact and unit of analysis and is evaluated formatively through reflective analysis of its internal coherence, alignment with ADR principles, and applicability to solo research practice. By explicitly linking research software development, Human-AI collaboration, and reflective learning, this study contributes to broader discussions on how SHAPR can support both knowledge production and HDR researcher training.

Related papers

• Towards AI-Supported Research: a Vision of the TIB AIssistant [6.36260975777314]
  We present the vision of the TIB AIssistant, a domain-agnostic human-machine collaborative platform designed to support researchers across disciplines in scientific discovery.<n>We describe the conceptual framework, system architecture, and implementation of an early prototype that demonstrates the feasibility and potential impact of our approach.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-18T12:08:46Z)
• Towards AI Agents Supported Research Problem Formulation [3.6732711233211663]
  Poorly formulated research problems can compromise the practical relevance of Software Engineering studies.<n>This vision paper explores the use of artificial intelligence agents to support SE researchers during the early stage of a research project.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-14T14:44:27Z)
• Report on the Scoping Workshop on AI in Science Education Research 2025 [2.0613397238713778]
  Report summarizes the outcomes of a two-day international scoping workshop on the role of artificial intelligence (AI) in science education research.<n>As AI rapidly reshapes scientific practice, classroom learning, and research methods, the field faces both new opportunities and significant challenges.<n>Report concludes with actionable recommendations for training, infrastructure, and standards, along with guidance for funders, policymakers, professional organizations, and academic departments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-18T10:23:22Z)
• A Survey of Vibe Coding with Large Language Models [93.88284590533242]
  "Vibe Coding" is a development methodology where developers validate AI-generated implementations through outcome observation.<n>Despite its transformative potential, the effectiveness of this emergent paradigm remains under-explored.<n>This survey provides the first comprehensive and systematic review of Vibe Coding with large language models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-14T11:26:56Z)
• Understanding Large Language Models' Ability on Interdisciplinary Research [27.539601507270575]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) are powerful tools and collaborators in scientific discovery.<n>The lack of a dedicated benchmark that evaluates LLMs' ability to develop ideas in Interdisciplinary Research poses a critical barrier to fully understanding their strengths and limitations.<n>We introduce IDRBench -- a pioneering benchmark featuring an expert annotated dataset and a suite of tasks tailored to evaluate LLMs' capabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-21T15:43:05Z)
• MLGym: A New Framework and Benchmark for Advancing AI Research Agents [51.9387884953294]
  We introduce Meta MLGym and MLGym-Bench, a new framework and benchmark for evaluating and developing large language models on AI research tasks.<n>This is the first Gym environment for machine learning (ML) tasks, enabling research on reinforcement learning (RL) algorithms for training such agents.<n>We evaluate a number of frontier large language models (LLMs) on our benchmarks such as Claude-3.5-Sonnet, Llama-3.1 405B, GPT-4o, o1-preview, and Gemini-1.5 Pro.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-20T12:28:23Z)
• The Participatory Turn in AI Design: Theoretical Foundations and the Current State of Practice [64.29355073494125]
  This article aims to ground what we dub the "participatory turn" in AI design by synthesizing existing theoretical literature on participation. We articulate empirical findings concerning the current state of participatory practice in AI design based on an analysis of recently published research and semi-structured interviews with 12 AI researchers and practitioners.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-02T05:30:42Z)
• The Equitable AI Research Roundtable (EARR): Towards Community-Based Decision Making in Responsible AI Development [4.1986677342209004]
  The paper reports on our initial evaluation of The Equitable AI Research Roundtable. EARR was created in collaboration among a large tech firm, nonprofits, NGO research institutions, and universities. We outline three principles in practice of how EARR has operated thus far that are especially relevant to the concerns of the FAccT community.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-14T18:57:20Z)
• Stakeholder Participation in AI: Beyond "Add Diverse Stakeholders and Stir" [76.44130385507894]
  This paper aims to ground what we dub a 'participatory turn' in AI design by synthesizing existing literature on participation and through empirical analysis of its current practices. Based on our literature synthesis and empirical research, this paper presents a conceptual framework for analyzing participatory approaches to AI design.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-01T17:57:04Z)
• An interdisciplinary conceptual study of Artificial Intelligence (AI) for helping benefit-risk assessment practices: Towards a comprehensive qualification matrix of AI programs and devices (pre-print 2020) [55.41644538483948]
  This paper proposes a comprehensive analysis of existing concepts coming from different disciplines tackling the notion of intelligence. The aim is to identify shared notions or discrepancies to consider for qualifying AI systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-07T12:01:31Z)
• Artificial Intelligence for IT Operations (AIOPS) Workshop White Paper [50.25428141435537]
  Artificial Intelligence for IT Operations (AIOps) is an emerging interdisciplinary field arising in the intersection between machine learning, big data, streaming analytics, and the management of IT operations. Main aim of the AIOPS workshop is to bring together researchers from both academia and industry to present their experiences, results, and work in progress in this field.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-15T10:43:10Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.