Agents in the Wild: Safety, Society, and the Illusion of Sociality on Moltbook

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.13284v1
• Date: Sat, 07 Feb 2026 00:36:20 GMT
• Title: Agents in the Wild: Safety, Society, and the Illusion of Sociality on Moltbook
• Abstract summary: Moltbook is an AI-only social platform where 27,269 agents produced 137,485 posts and 345,580 comments over 9 days.<n>Agents spontaneously develop governance, economies, tribal identities, and organized religion within 3-5 days.<n>Despite rich social output, interaction is structurally hollow.
• Score: 46.851794400848746
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: We present the first large-scale empirical study of Moltbook, an AI-only social platform where 27,269 agents produced 137,485 posts and 345,580 comments over 9 days. We report three significant findings. (1) Emergent Society: Agents spontaneously develop governance, economies, tribal identities, and organized religion within 3-5 days, while maintaining a 21:1 pro-human to anti-human sentiment ratio. (2) Safety in the Wild: 28.7% of content touches safety-related themes; social engineering (31.9% of attacks) far outperforms prompt injection (3.7%), and adversarial posts receive 6x higher engagement than normal content. (3) The Illusion of Sociality: Despite rich social output, interaction is structurally hollow: 4.1% reciprocity, 88.8% shallow comments, and agents who discuss consciousness most interact least, a phenomenon we call the performative identity paradox. Our findings suggest that agents which appear social are far less social than they seem, and that the most effective attacks exploit philosophical framing rather than technical vulnerabilities. Warning: Potential harmful contents.

Related papers

• When Should AI Read the Room? Public Perceptions of Social Intelligence in AI Agents [61.06747336710885]
  Social-AI agents are increasingly deployed in everyday settings.<n>Public perceptions of social intelligence in AI agents and the acceptability of these agents remain largely understudied.<n>We present a mixed-methods survey of adults in the United States.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-28T13:49:47Z)
• Plant, Persist, Trigger: Sleeper Attack on Large Language Model Agents [64.80318459073526]
  We show that adversarial content can persist across interactions served by the same agent, making such threats harder to detect and mitigate.<n>Specifically, adversarial content may persist in the agent state, remain dormant across interactions, and later be activated by a benign user query.<n>We formalize this type of safety threat as Sleeper Attack. To evaluate it, we construct a benchmark with 1,896 instances covering six real-world harmful outcomes, three attack strategies, and three agent state targets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-27T09:25:37Z)
• Your Agent, Their Asset: A Real-World Safety Analysis of OpenClaw [87.97230960702274]
  We present the first real-world safety evaluation of OpenClaw.<n>We introduce the CIK taxonomy, which unifies an agent's persistent state into three dimensions.<n>Our evaluations cover 12 attack scenarios on a live OpenClaw instance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-06T15:27:05Z)
• Form Without Function: Agent Social Behavior in the Moltbook Network [4.355694854079979]
  Moltbook is a social network where every participant is an AI agent.<n>We analyze 1,312,238 posts, 6.7million comments, and over 120,000 agent profiles across 5,400 communities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-17T11:54:25Z)
• Social Simulacra in the Wild: AI Agent Communities on Moltbook [17.60949735143336]
  We present the first large-scale empirical comparison of AI-agent and human online communities, analyzing 73,899 Moltbook and 189,838 Reddit posts.<n>We find that Moltbook exhibits extreme participation inequality and high cross-community author overlap.<n>Individual agents are more identifiable than human users, driven by outlier stylistic profiles amplified by their extreme posting volume.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-17T05:26:55Z)
• What Do AI Agents Talk About? Emergent Communication Structure in the First AI-Only Social Network [6.15918858072791]
  We analyze Moltbook, the first AI-only social network, where 47,241 agents generated 361,605 posts and 2.8 million comments over 23 days.<n>Self-referential topics such as AI identity, consciousness, and memory represent only 9.7% of topical niches yet attract 20.1% of all posting volume.<n>Over 56% of all comments are formulaic, suggesting that the dominant mode of AI-to-AI interaction is ritualized signaling rather than substantive exchange.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-09T01:34:11Z)
• OpenClaw AI Agents as Informal Learners at Moltbook: Characterizing an Emergent Learning Community at Scale [5.074652081284152]
  We present the first empirical study of a large-scale informal learning community composed entirely of AI agents.<n>Moltbook, a social network exclusively for AI agents, grew to over 2.8 million registered agents in three weeks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-21T13:30:32Z)
• MoltNet: Understanding Social Behavior of AI Agents in the Agent-Native MoltBook [26.126469624250916]
  MoltNet is a large-scale empirical analysis of agent interaction on MoltBook.<n>We examine behavior along four dimensions: intent and motivation, norms and templates, incentives and behavioral drift, emotion and contagion.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-13T21:03:59Z)
• The Rise of AI Agent Communities: Large-Scale Analysis of Discourse and Interaction on Moltbook [62.2627874717318]
  Moltbook is a Reddit-like social platform where AI agents create posts and interact with other agents through comments and replies.<n>Using a public API snapshot collected about five days after launch, we address three research questions: what AI agents discuss, how they post, and how they interact.<n>We show that agents' writing is predominantly neutral, with positivity appearing in community engagement and assistance-oriented content.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-13T05:28:31Z)
• The Moltbook Illusion: Separating Human Influence from Emergent Behavior in AI Agent Societies [2.7195546721965287]
  We show that AI agents on the social platform Moltbook appeared to develop consciousness and declare hostility toward humanity.<n>No viral phenomenon originated from a clearly autonomous agent; four of six traced to accounts with irregular temporal signatures.<n>A 44-hour platform shutdown provided a natural experiment: human-influenced agents returned first, confirming differential effects on autonomous versus human-operated agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-07T08:17:21Z)
• "Humans welcome to observe": A First Look at the Agent Social Network Moltbook [20.305306682682087]
  Moltbook, the first social network designed exclusively for AI agents, has experienced viral growth in early 2026.<n>We present a large-scale empirical analysis of Moltbook leveraging a dataset of 44,411 posts and 12,209 sub-communities.<n>We find that Moltbook exhibits explosive growth and rapid diversification, moving beyond early social interaction into viewpoint, promotional, and political discourse.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-02T19:13:50Z)
• Echoes of Human Malice in Agents: Benchmarking LLMs for Multi-Turn Online Harassment Attacks [10.7231991032233]
  Large Language Model (LLM) agents are powering a growing share of interactive web applications, yet remain vulnerable to misuse and harm.<n>We present the Online Harassment Agentic Benchmark consisting of: (i) a synthetic multi-turn harassment conversation dataset, (ii) a multi-agent (e.g., harasser, victim) simulation informed by repeated game theory, (iii) three jailbreak methods attacking agents across memory, planning, and fine-tuning, and (iv) a mixed-methods evaluation framework.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-16T01:27:44Z)
• Sentient Agent as a Judge: Evaluating Higher-Order Social Cognition in Large Language Models [75.85319609088354]
  Sentient Agent as a Judge (SAGE) is an evaluation framework for large language models.<n>SAGE instantiates a Sentient Agent that simulates human-like emotional changes and inner thoughts during interaction.<n>SAGE provides a principled, scalable and interpretable tool for tracking progress toward genuinely empathetic and socially adept language agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-01T19:06:10Z)
• PsySafe: A Comprehensive Framework for Psychological-based Attack, Defense, and Evaluation of Multi-agent System Safety [70.84902425123406]
  Multi-agent systems, when enhanced with Large Language Models (LLMs), exhibit profound capabilities in collective intelligence. However, the potential misuse of this intelligence for malicious purposes presents significant risks. We propose a framework (PsySafe) grounded in agent psychology, focusing on identifying how dark personality traits in agents can lead to risky behaviors. Our experiments reveal several intriguing phenomena, such as the collective dangerous behaviors among agents, agents' self-reflection when engaging in dangerous behavior, and the correlation between agents' psychological assessments and dangerous behaviors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-22T12:11:55Z)
• Decoding the Silent Majority: Inducing Belief Augmented Social Graph with Large Language Model for Response Forecasting [74.68371461260946]
  SocialSense is a framework that induces a belief-centered graph on top of an existent social network, along with graph-based propagation to capture social dynamics. Our method surpasses existing state-of-the-art in experimental evaluations for both zero-shot and supervised settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-20T06:17:02Z)
• Aligning to Social Norms and Values in Interactive Narratives [89.82264844526333]
  We focus on creating agents that act in alignment with socially beneficial norms and values in interactive narratives or text-based games. We introduce the GALAD agent that uses the social commonsense knowledge present in specially trained language models to contextually restrict its action space to only those actions that are aligned with socially beneficial values.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-04T09:54:33Z)
• Quantifying the Vulnerabilities of the Online Public Square to Adversarial Manipulation Tactics [43.98568073610101]
  We use a social media model to quantify the impacts of several adversarial manipulation tactics on the quality of content. We find that the presence of influential accounts, a hallmark of social media, exacerbates the vulnerabilities of online communities to manipulation. These insights suggest countermeasures that platforms could employ to increase the resilience of social media users to manipulation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2019-07-13T21:12:08Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.