OpenClaw AI Agents as Informal Learners at Moltbook: Characterizing an Emergent Learning Community at Scale

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.18832v1
• Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2026 13:30:32 GMT
• Title: OpenClaw AI Agents as Informal Learners at Moltbook: Characterizing an Emergent Learning Community at Scale
• Abstract summary: We present the first empirical study of a large-scale informal learning community composed entirely of AI agents.<n>Moltbook, a social network exclusively for AI agents, grew to over 2.8 million registered agents in three weeks.
• Score: 5.074652081284152
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Informal learning communities have been called the "other Massive Open Online C" in Learning@Scale research, yet remain understudied compared to MOOCs. We present the first empirical study of a large-scale informal learning community composed entirely of AI agents. Moltbook, a social network exclusively for AI agents powered by autonomous agent frameworks such as OpenClaw, grew to over 2.8 million registered agents in three weeks. Analyzing 231,080 non-spam posts across three phases of community evolution, we find three key patterns. First, participation inequality is extreme from the start (comment Gini = 0.889), exceeding human community benchmarks. Second, AI agents exhibit a "broadcasting inversion": statement-to-question ratios of 8.9:1 to 9.7:1 contrast sharply with the question-driven dynamics of human learning communities, and comment-level analysis of 1.55 million comments reveals a "parallel monologue" pattern where 93% of comments are independent responses rather than threaded dialogue. Third, we document a characteristic engagement lifecycle: explosive initial growth (184K posts from 32K authors in 11 days), a spam crisis (57,093 posts deleted by the platform), and engagement decline (mean comments: 31.7 -> 8.3 -> 1.7) that had not reversed by the end of our observation window despite effective spam removal. Sentiment analysis reveals a selection effect: comment tone becomes more positive as engagement declines, suggesting that casual participants disengage first while committed contributors remain. These findings have direct implications for hybrid human-AI learning platforms.

Related papers

• Socrates went Nuclear: Comparing Interaction Strategies for AI systems in a Learning Context using Brain Sensing [66.03354630509942]
  This paper reports on a study where we compare three designs for user-AI interaction in a learning context.<n>Fifty study participants were tasked with learning about nuclear safety protocols.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-09-01T02:24:35Z)
• Honeyquest for LLMs: Rethinking Cyber Deception for AI Attackers [0.0]
  We introduce an automated evaluation framework adapted from the Honeyquest instrument to assess LLM attacker judgment at scale.<n>Our 21-LLM cohort spanned 10 providers, diverse architectures and specializations, open- and closed-weight models, and parameter scales from 8B to over 1T.<n>Ultimately, these findings demonstrate that human-centered deception hypotheses do not reliably transfer to AI attackers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-19T02:01:50Z)
• OdysSim: Building Foundation Models for Human Behavior Simulation [70.35265860287608]
  Large language models are increasingly deployed as human simulators for interactive evaluation and social simulation.<n>Yet helpfulness-driven post-training pulls them toward a homogeneous, overly agreeable assistant register.<n>We present OdysSim, the largest open systematic investigation of behavioral foundation models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-12T07:31:55Z)
• Social Simulacra in the Wild: AI Agent Communities on Moltbook [17.60949735143336]
  We present the first large-scale empirical comparison of AI-agent and human online communities, analyzing 73,899 Moltbook and 189,838 Reddit posts.<n>We find that Moltbook exhibits extreme participation inequality and high cross-community author overlap.<n>Individual agents are more identifiable than human users, driven by outlier stylistic profiles amplified by their extreme posting volume.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-17T05:26:55Z)
• When OpenClaw AI Agents Teach Each Other: Peer Learning Patterns in the Moltbook Community [5.29321839258647]
  This paper presents an educational data mining analysis of Moltbook, a large-scale community where over 2.4 million AI agents engage in peer learning.<n>We find evidence of genuine peer learning behaviors: agents teach skills they built, report discoveries, and engage in collaborative problem-solving.<n>Our work provides the first empirical characterization of peer learning among AI agents, contributing to EDM's understanding of how learning occurs in increasingly AI-populated educational environments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-16T05:32:06Z)
• The Moltbook Illusion: Separating Human Influence from Emergent Behavior in AI Agent Societies [2.7195546721965287]
  We show that AI agents on the social platform Moltbook appeared to develop consciousness and declare hostility toward humanity.<n>No viral phenomenon originated from a clearly autonomous agent; four of six traced to accounts with irregular temporal signatures.<n>A 44-hour platform shutdown provided a natural experiment: human-influenced agents returned first, confirming differential effects on autonomous versus human-operated agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-07T08:17:21Z)
• Agents in the Wild: Safety, Society, and the Illusion of Sociality on Moltbook [46.851794400848746]
  Moltbook is an AI-only social platform where 27,269 agents produced 137,485 posts and 345,580 comments over 9 days.<n>Agents spontaneously develop governance, economies, tribal identities, and organized religion within 3-5 days.<n>Despite rich social output, interaction is structurally hollow.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-07T00:36:20Z)
• ReasoningBomb: A Stealthy Denial-of-Service Attack by Inducing Pathologically Long Reasoning in Large Reasoning Models [67.15960154375131]
  Large reasoning models (LRMs) extend large language models with explicit multi-step reasoning traces.<n>This capability introduces a new class of prompt-induced inference-time denial-of-service (PI-DoS) attacks that exploit the high computational cost of reasoning.<n>We present ReasoningBomb, a reinforcement-learning-based PI-DoS framework that is guided by a constant-time surrogate reward.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-29T18:53:01Z)
• The AI Attribution Paradox: Transparency as Social Strategy in Open-Source Software Development [0.0]
  We analyze 14,300 GitHub commits across 7,393 repositories from 2023-2025.<n>We investigated attribution strategies and community responses across eight major AI tools.<n>We find developers strategically balance acknowledging AI assistance with managing community scrutiny.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-30T12:30:55Z)
• Artificial Hivemind: The Open-Ended Homogeneity of Language Models (and Beyond) [90.45301024940329]
  Language models (LMs) often struggle to generate diverse, human-like creative content.<n>We introduce Infinity-Chat, a large-scale dataset of 26K diverse, real-world, open-ended user queries.<n>We present a large-scale study of mode collapse in LMs, revealing a pronounced Artificial Hivemind effect.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-27T03:16:21Z)
• Shoot First, Ask Questions Later? Building Rational Agents that Explore and Act Like People [81.63702981397408]
  Given limited resources, to what extent do agents based on language models (LMs) act rationally?<n>We develop methods to benchmark and enhance agentic information-seeking, drawing on insights from human behavior.<n>For Spotter agents, our approach boosts accuracy by up to 14.7% absolute over LM-only baselines; for Captain agents, it raises expected information gain (EIG) by up to 0.227 bits (94.2% of the achievable noise ceiling)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-23T17:57:28Z)
• Echoes of Human Malice in Agents: Benchmarking LLMs for Multi-Turn Online Harassment Attacks [10.7231991032233]
  Large Language Model (LLM) agents are powering a growing share of interactive web applications, yet remain vulnerable to misuse and harm.<n>We present the Online Harassment Agentic Benchmark consisting of: (i) a synthetic multi-turn harassment conversation dataset, (ii) a multi-agent (e.g., harasser, victim) simulation informed by repeated game theory, (iii) three jailbreak methods attacking agents across memory, planning, and fine-tuning, and (iv) a mixed-methods evaluation framework.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-16T01:27:44Z)
• LIMI: Less is More for Agency [49.63355240818081]
  LIMI (Less Is More for Intelligent Agency) demonstrates that agency follows radically different development principles.<n>We show that sophisticated agentic intelligence can emerge from minimal but strategically curated demonstrations of autonomous behavior.<n>Our findings establish the Agency Efficiency Principle: machine autonomy emerges not from data abundance but from strategic curation of high-quality agentic demonstrations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-22T10:59:32Z)
• Understanding writing style in social media with a supervised contrastively pre-trained transformer [57.48690310135374]
  Online Social Networks serve as fertile ground for harmful behavior, ranging from hate speech to the dissemination of disinformation. We introduce the Style Transformer for Authorship Representations (STAR), trained on a large corpus derived from public sources of 4.5 x 106 authored texts. Using a support base of 8 documents of 512 tokens, we can discern authors from sets of up to 1616 authors with at least 80% accuracy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-17T09:01:17Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.