StackingNet: Collective Inference Across Independent AI Foundation Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.13792v1
• Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2026 14:12:43 GMT
• Title: StackingNet: Collective Inference Across Independent AI Foundation Models
• Authors: Siyang Li, Chenhao Liu, Dongrui Wu, Zhigang Zeng, Lieyun Ding,
• Abstract summary: We show that coordination can be achieved through a meta-ensemble framework termed StackingNet.<n>StackingNet improves accuracy, reduces bias, enables reliability ranking, and identifies or prunes models that degrade performance.<n>By turning diversity from a source of inconsistency into collaboration, StackingNet establishes a practical foundation for coordinated artificial intelligence.
• Score: 46.16216152540918
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: Artificial intelligence built on large foundation models has transformed language understanding, vision and reasoning, yet these systems remain isolated and cannot readily share their capabilities. Integrating the complementary strengths of such independent foundation models is essential for building trustworthy intelligent systems. Despite rapid progress in individual model design, there is no established approach for coordinating such black-box heterogeneous models. Here we show that coordination can be achieved through a meta-ensemble framework termed StackingNet, which draws on principles of collective intelligence to combine model predictions during inference. StackingNet improves accuracy, reduces bias, enables reliability ranking, and identifies or prunes models that degrade performance, all operating without access to internal parameters or training data. Across tasks involving language comprehension, visual estimation, and academic paper rating, StackingNet consistently improves accuracy, robustness, and fairness, compared with individual models and classic ensembles. By turning diversity from a source of inconsistency into collaboration, StackingNet establishes a practical foundation for coordinated artificial intelligence, suggesting that progress may emerge from not only larger single models but also principled cooperation among many specialized ones.

Related papers

• Forging Spatial Intelligence: A Roadmap of Multi-Modal Data Pre-Training for Autonomous Systems [75.78934957242403]
  Self-driving vehicles and drones require true Spatial Intelligence from multi-modal onboard sensor data.<n>This paper presents a framework for multi-modal pre-training, identifying the core set of techniques driving progress toward this goal.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-30T17:58:01Z)
• Uni-MMMU: A Massive Multi-discipline Multimodal Unified Benchmark [69.8473923357969]
  Unified multimodal models aim to jointly enable visual understanding and generation, yet current benchmarks rarely examine their true integration.<n>We present Uni-MMMU, a comprehensive benchmark that unfolds the bidirectional synergy between generation and understanding across eight reasoning-centric domains.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-15T17:10:35Z)
• UNIFORM: Unifying Knowledge from Large-scale and Diverse Pre-trained Models [62.76435672183968]
  We introduce a novel framework, namely UNIFORM, for knowledge transfer from a diverse set of off-the-shelf models into one student model.<n>We propose a dedicated voting mechanism to capture the consensus of knowledge both at the logit level and at the feature level.<n>Experiments demonstrate that UNIFORM effectively enhances unsupervised object recognition performance compared to strong knowledge transfer baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-27T00:56:11Z)
• Corpus Considerations for Annotator Modeling and Scaling [9.263562546969695]
  We show that the commonly used user token model consistently outperforms more complex models. Our findings shed light on the relationship between corpus statistics and annotator modeling performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-02T22:27:24Z)
• Unifying Self-Supervised Clustering and Energy-Based Models [9.3176264568834]
  We establish a principled connection between self-supervised learning and generative models.<n>We show that our solution can be integrated into a neuro-symbolic framework to tackle a simple yet non-trivial instantiation of the symbol grounding problem.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-30T04:46:16Z)
• Fantastic Gains and Where to Find Them: On the Existence and Prospect of General Knowledge Transfer between Any Pretrained Model [74.62272538148245]
  We show that for arbitrary pairings of pretrained models, one model extracts significant data context unavailable in the other. We investigate if it is possible to transfer such "complementary" knowledge from one model to another without performance degradation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-26T17:59:46Z)
• Diversified Ensemble of Independent Sub-Networks for Robust Self-Supervised Representation Learning [10.784911682565879]
  Ensembling a neural network is a widely recognized approach to enhance model performance, estimate uncertainty, and improve robustness in deep supervised learning. We present a novel self-supervised training regime that leverages an ensemble of independent sub-networks. Our method efficiently builds a sub-model ensemble with high diversity, leading to well-calibrated estimates of model uncertainty.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-28T16:58:44Z)
• Concept-Centric Transformers: Enhancing Model Interpretability through Object-Centric Concept Learning within a Shared Global Workspace [1.6574413179773757]
  Concept-Centric Transformers is a simple yet effective configuration of the shared global workspace for interpretability. We show that our model achieves better classification accuracy than all baselines across all problems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-25T06:37:39Z)
• Rethinking Self-Supervision Objectives for Generalizable Coherence Modeling [8.329870357145927]
  Coherence evaluation of machine generated text is one of the principal applications of coherence models that needs to be investigated. We explore training data and self-supervision objectives that result in a model that generalizes well across tasks. We show empirically that increasing the density of negative samples improves the basic model, and using a global negative queue further improves and stabilizes the model while training with hard negative samples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-14T07:44:14Z)
• Goal-Aware Prediction: Learning to Model What Matters [105.43098326577434]
  One of the fundamental challenges in using a learned forward dynamics model is the mismatch between the objective of the learned model and that of the downstream planner or policy. We propose to direct prediction towards task relevant information, enabling the model to be aware of the current task and encouraging it to only model relevant quantities of the state space. We find that our method more effectively models the relevant parts of the scene conditioned on the goal, and as a result outperforms standard task-agnostic dynamics models and model-free reinforcement learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-14T16:42:59Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.