Corpus Considerations for Annotator Modeling and Scaling

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2404.02340v2
• Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2024 14:02:03 GMT
• Title: Corpus Considerations for Annotator Modeling and Scaling
• Authors: Olufunke O. Sarumi, Béla Neuendorf, Joan Plepi, Lucie Flek, Jörg Schlötterer, Charles Welch,
• Abstract summary: We show that the commonly used user token model consistently outperforms more complex models. Our findings shed light on the relationship between corpus statistics and annotator modeling performance.
• Score: 9.263562546969695
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Recent trends in natural language processing research and annotation tasks affirm a paradigm shift from the traditional reliance on a single ground truth to a focus on individual perspectives, particularly in subjective tasks. In scenarios where annotation tasks are meant to encompass diversity, models that solely rely on the majority class labels may inadvertently disregard valuable minority perspectives. This oversight could result in the omission of crucial information and, in a broader context, risk disrupting the balance within larger ecosystems. As the landscape of annotator modeling unfolds with diverse representation techniques, it becomes imperative to investigate their effectiveness with the fine-grained features of the datasets in view. This study systematically explores various annotator modeling techniques and compares their performance across seven corpora. From our findings, we show that the commonly used user token model consistently outperforms more complex models. We introduce a composite embedding approach and show distinct differences in which model performs best as a function of the agreement with a given dataset. Our findings shed light on the relationship between corpus statistics and annotator modeling performance, which informs future work on corpus construction and perspectivist NLP.

Related papers

• Has Your Pretrained Model Improved? A Multi-head Posterior Based Approach [25.927323251675386]
  We leverage the meta-features associated with each entity as a source of worldly knowledge and employ entity representations from the models. We propose using the consistency between these representations and the meta-features as a metric for evaluating pre-trained models. Our method's effectiveness is demonstrated across various domains, including models with relational datasets, large language models and image models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-02T17:08:26Z)
• Fantastic Gains and Where to Find Them: On the Existence and Prospect of General Knowledge Transfer between Any Pretrained Model [74.62272538148245]
  We show that for arbitrary pairings of pretrained models, one model extracts significant data context unavailable in the other. We investigate if it is possible to transfer such "complementary" knowledge from one model to another without performance degradation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-26T17:59:46Z)
• StableLLaVA: Enhanced Visual Instruction Tuning with Synthesized Image-Dialogue Data [129.92449761766025]
  We propose a novel data collection methodology that synchronously synthesizes images and dialogues for visual instruction tuning. This approach harnesses the power of generative models, marrying the abilities of ChatGPT and text-to-image generative models. Our research includes comprehensive experiments conducted on various datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-20T12:43:52Z)
• UniDiff: Advancing Vision-Language Models with Generative and Discriminative Learning [86.91893533388628]
  This paper presents UniDiff, a unified multi-modal model that integrates image-text contrastive learning (ITC), text-conditioned image synthesis learning (IS), and reciprocal semantic consistency modeling (RSC) UniDiff demonstrates versatility in both multi-modal understanding and generative tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-01T15:39:38Z)
• Scaling Vision-Language Models with Sparse Mixture of Experts [128.0882767889029]
  We show that mixture-of-experts (MoE) techniques can achieve state-of-the-art performance on a range of benchmarks over dense models of equivalent computational cost. Our research offers valuable insights into stabilizing the training of MoE models, understanding the impact of MoE on model interpretability, and balancing the trade-offs between compute performance when scaling vision-language models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-13T16:00:31Z)
• An Empirical Investigation of Commonsense Self-Supervision with Knowledge Graphs [67.23285413610243]
  Self-supervision based on the information extracted from large knowledge graphs has been shown to improve the generalization of language models. We study the effect of knowledge sampling strategies and sizes that can be used to generate synthetic data for adapting language models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-21T19:49:04Z)
• Efficient Multi-Modal Embeddings from Structured Data [0.0]
  Multi-modal word semantics aims to enhance embeddings with perceptual input. Visual grounding can contribute to linguistic applications as well. New embedding conveys complementary information for text based embeddings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-06T08:42:09Z)
• Prototypical Representation Learning for Relation Extraction [56.501332067073065]
  This paper aims to learn predictive, interpretable, and robust relation representations from distantly-labeled data. We learn prototypes for each relation from contextual information to best explore the intrinsic semantics of relations. Results on several relation learning tasks show that our model significantly outperforms the previous state-of-the-art relational models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-22T08:11:43Z)
• Evaluating the Interpretability of Generative Models by Interactive Reconstruction [30.441247705313575]
  We introduce a task to quantify the human-interpretability of generative model representations. We find performance on this task much more reliably differentiates entangled and disentangled models than baseline approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-02T02:38:14Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.