Replanning Human-Robot Collaborative Tasks with Vision-Language Models via Semantic and Physical Dual-Correction

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.14551v1
• Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2026 08:24:19 GMT
• Title: Replanning Human-Robot Collaborative Tasks with Vision-Language Models via Semantic and Physical Dual-Correction
• Abstract summary: Human-Robot Collaboration plays an important role in assembly tasks by enabling robots to plan and adjust their motions based on interactive, real-time human instructions.<n>Such instructions are often linguistically ambiguous and underspecified, making it difficult to generate physically feasible and cooperative robot behaviors.<n>We propose an HRC framework that augments a VLM-based reasoning with a dual-correction mechanism.
• Score: 7.668882674013904
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Human-Robot Collaboration (HRC) plays an important role in assembly tasks by enabling robots to plan and adjust their motions based on interactive, real-time human instructions. However, such instructions are often linguistically ambiguous and underspecified, making it difficult to generate physically feasible and cooperative robot behaviors. To address this challenge, many studies have applied Vision-Language Models (VLMs) to interpret high-level instructions and generate corresponding actions. Nevertheless, VLM-based approaches still suffer from hallucinated reasoning and an inability to anticipate physical execution failures. To address these challenges, we propose an HRC framework that augments a VLM-based reasoning with a dual-correction mechanism: an internal correction model that verifies logical consistency and task feasibility prior to action execution, and an external correction model that detects and rectifies physical failures through post-execution feedback. Simulation ablation studies demonstrate that the proposed method improves the success rate compared to baselines without correction models. Our real-world experiments in collaborative assembly tasks supported by object fixation or tool preparation by an upper body humanoid robot further confirm the framewor's effectiveness in enabling interactive replanning across different collaborative tasks in response to human instructions, validating its practical feasibility.

Related papers

• Structured LLM Reasoning for Zero-Shot Human--Robot Coordination Under Hidden Goals [3.158926173252809]
  We present a structured large-language-model (LLM) architecture for zero-shot human--robot coordination in a cooperative construction task with private goal views.<n> Guided by a Dec-POMDP formulation, the architecture decomposes decision-making into (i) action-conditioned Theory-of-Mind (ToM) inference, (ii) hierarchical planning, (iii) conversation interpretation, (iv) action verification, and (v) feedback-based replanning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-05T00:40:03Z)
• HRIBench: Benchmarking Interaction-Centric Human-Robot Collaboration [62.19372189311434]
  We introduce HRIBench, a diagnostic benchmark for intent-aware human-robot collaboration based on executable scenarios.<n>HRIBench represents collaborative tasks as structured scenario scripts that explicitly model agent roles, temporal dependencies, coordination constraints, and human behavior distributions.<n>Results show that current foundation robot policies struggle substantially in collaborative settings despite strong manipulation ability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-05T09:15:35Z)
• Assistance Without Interruption: A Benchmark and LLM-based Framework for Non-Intrusive Human-Robot Assistance [44.10105182063131]
  We formalize and benchmark the non-intrusive assistance as an independent paradigm of human-robot interaction (HRI)<n>Unlike conventional HRI tasks that rely on direct commands, explicit negotiation, or proactive interventions based on user habits and history, our task treats the human's plan as the primary process and formulates assistance as a joint decision over when to act and what to do.<n> Comprehensive experiments on both NIABench and real-world scenarios demonstrate that our method achieves proactive, non-intrusive assistance that reduces human effort while preserving task effectiveness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-02T10:25:40Z)
• Language-Grounded Decoupled Action Representation for Robotic Manipulation [78.42228162226839]
  We propose the Language-Grounded Decoupled Action Representation (LaDA) framework to connect perception and control.<n>LaDA introduces a fine-grained intermediate layer of three interpretable action primitives--translation, rotation, and gripper control--providing explicit semantic structure for low-level actions.<n>It further employs a semantic-guided soft-label contrastive learning objective to align similar action primitives across tasks, enhancing generalization and motion consistency.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-13T13:08:26Z)
• TATIC: Task-Aware Temporal Learning for Human Intent Inference from Physical Corrections in Human-Robot Collaboration [3.4672098154671995]
  In human-robot collaboration (HRC), robots must adapt online to dynamic task constraints and evolving human intent.<n>We propose TATIC, a unified framework that utilizes torque-based contact force estimation and a task-aware Temporal Convolutional Network (TCN) to infer discrete task-level intent.<n>Experiments achieve a 0.904 Macro-F1 score in intent recognition and demonstrate successful hardware validation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-10T21:19:25Z)
• Act, Think or Abstain: Complexity-Aware Adaptive Inference for Vision-Language-Action Models [7.802379200026965]
  We propose an adaptive framework that dynamically routes VLA execution based on the complexity of the perceived state.<n>Our approach transforms the VLA's vision-language backbone into an active detection tool by projecting latent embeddings into an ensemble of parametric and non-parametric estimators.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-05T13:14:41Z)
• From Perception to Action: An Interactive Benchmark for Vision Reasoning [51.11355591375073]
  Causal Hierarchy of Actions and Interactions (CHAIN) benchmark designed to evaluate whether models can understand, plan, and execute structured action sequences grounded in physical constraints.<n> CHAIN shifts evaluation from passive perception to active problem solving, spanning tasks such as interlocking mechanical puzzles and 3D stacking and packing.<n>Our results show that top-performing models still struggle to internalize physical structure and causal constraints, often failing to produce reliable long-horizon plans and cannot robustly translate perceived structure into effective actions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-24T15:33:02Z)
• Anticipate, Adapt, Act: A Hybrid Framework for Task Planning [18.95315033393626]
  Anticipating and adapting to failures is a key capability robots need to collaborate effectively with humans in complex domains.<n>We present a hybrid framework that integrates the generic prediction capabilities of an LLM with the sequential decision-making capability of Dynamic Influence Diagram Language.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-23T05:18:11Z)
• IntentionVLA: Generalizable and Efficient Embodied Intention Reasoning for Human-Robot Interaction [51.130510883952546]
  Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models leverage pretrained vision-language models (VLMs) to couple perception with robotic control.<n>We propose textbfIntentionVLA, a VLA framework with a curriculum training paradigm and an efficient inference mechanism.<n>Our proposed method first leverages carefully designed reasoning data that combine intention inference, spatial grounding, and compact embodied reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-09T04:49:46Z)
• Grounding Language Models with Semantic Digital Twins for Robotic Planning [6.474368392218828]
  We introduce a novel framework that integrates Semantic Digital Twins (SDTs) with Large Language Models (LLMs)<n>The proposed framework effectively combines high-level reasoning with semantic environment understanding, achieving reliable task completion in the face of uncertainty and failure.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-19T17:38:00Z)
• Large Language Model-based Human-Agent Collaboration for Complex Task Solving [94.3914058341565]
  We introduce the problem of Large Language Models (LLMs)-based human-agent collaboration for complex task-solving. We propose a Reinforcement Learning-based Human-Agent Collaboration method, ReHAC. This approach includes a policy model designed to determine the most opportune stages for human intervention within the task-solving process.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-20T11:03:36Z)
• ThinkBot: Embodied Instruction Following with Thought Chain Reasoning [66.09880459084901]
  Embodied Instruction Following (EIF) requires agents to complete human instruction by interacting objects in complicated surrounding environments. We propose ThinkBot that reasons the thought chain in human instruction to recover the missing action descriptions. Our ThinkBot outperforms the state-of-the-art EIF methods by a sizable margin in both success rate and execution efficiency.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-12T08:30:09Z)
• Robust Planning for Human-Robot Joint Tasks with Explicit Reasoning on Human Mental State [2.8246074016493457]
  We consider the human-aware task planning problem where a human-robot team is given a shared task with a known objective to achieve. Recent approaches tackle it by modeling it as a team of independent, rational agents, where the robot plans for both agents' (shared) tasks. We describe a novel approach to solve such problems, which models and uses execution-time observability conventions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-17T09:21:00Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.