Extending Multi-Source Bayesian Optimization With Causality Principles

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.14791v1
• Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2026 14:38:16 GMT
• Title: Extending Multi-Source Bayesian Optimization With Causality Principles
• Authors: Luuk Jacobs, Mohammad Ali Javidian,
• Abstract summary: We propose a principled integration of the MSBO and CBO methodologies in the multi-source domain.<n>We show how their synergy informs our Multi-Source Causal Bayesian Optimization (MSCBO) algorithm.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Multi-Source Bayesian Optimization (MSBO) serves as a variant of the traditional Bayesian Optimization (BO) framework applicable to situations involving optimization of an objective black-box function over multiple information sources such as simulations, surrogate models, or real-world experiments. However, traditional MSBO assumes the input variables of the objective function to be independent and identically distributed, limiting its effectiveness in scenarios where causal information is available and interventions can be performed, such as clinical trials or policy-making. In the single-source domain, Causal Bayesian Optimization (CBO) extends standard BO with the principles of causality, enabling better modeling of variable dependencies. This leads to more accurate optimization, improved decision-making, and more efficient use of low-cost information sources. In this article, we propose a principled integration of the MSBO and CBO methodologies in the multi-source domain, leveraging the strengths of both to enhance optimization efficiency and reduce computational complexity in higher-dimensional problems. We present the theoretical foundations of both Causal and Multi-Source Bayesian Optimization, and demonstrate how their synergy informs our Multi-Source Causal Bayesian Optimization (MSCBO) algorithm. We compare the performance of MSCBO against its foundational counterparts for both synthetic and real-world datasets with varying levels of noise, highlighting the robustness and applicability of MSCBO. Based on our findings, we conclude that integrating MSBO with the causality principles of CBO facilitates dimensionality reduction and lowers operational costs, ultimately improving convergence speed, performance, and scalability.

Related papers

• VBO-MI: A Fully Gradient-Based Bayesian Optimization Framework Using Variational Mutual Information Estimation [1.0829694003408499]
  VBO-MI is a fully gradient-based BO framework that leverages recent advances in variational mutual information estimation.<n>We evaluate our method on a diverse suite of benchmarks, including high-dimensional synthetic functions and complex real-world tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-13T03:07:52Z)
• Multi-Objective Causal Bayesian Optimization [2.5311562666866494]
  We propose Multi-Objective Causal Bayesian Optimization (MO-CBO) to identify optimal interventions within a known multi-target causal graph.<n>We show that MO-CBO can be decomposed into several traditional multi-objective optimization tasks.<n>The proposed method will be validated on both synthetic and real-world causal graphs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-20T17:26:16Z)
• Cost-Sensitive Multi-Fidelity Bayesian Optimization with Transfer of Learning Curve Extrapolation [55.75188191403343]
  We introduce utility, which is a function predefined by each user and describes the trade-off between cost and performance of BO. We validate our algorithm on various LC datasets and found it outperform all the previous multi-fidelity BO and transfer-BO baselines we consider.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-28T07:38:39Z)
• Enhanced Bayesian Optimization via Preferential Modeling of Abstract Properties [49.351577714596544]
  We propose a human-AI collaborative Bayesian framework to incorporate expert preferences about unmeasured abstract properties into surrogate modeling. We provide an efficient strategy that can also handle any incorrect/misleading expert bias in preferential judgments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-27T09:23:13Z)
• A General Framework for User-Guided Bayesian Optimization [51.96352579696041]
  We propose ColaBO, the first Bayesian-principled framework for prior beliefs beyond the typical kernel structure. We empirically demonstrate ColaBO's ability to substantially accelerate optimization when the prior information is accurate, and to retain approximately default performance when it is misleading.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-24T18:27:26Z)
• Benchmarking PtO and PnO Methods in the Predictive Combinatorial Optimization Regime [59.27851754647913]
  Predictive optimization is the precise modeling of many real-world applications, including energy cost-aware scheduling and budget allocation on advertising. We develop a modular framework to benchmark 11 existing PtO/PnO methods on 8 problems, including a new industrial dataset for advertising. Our study shows that PnO approaches are better than PtO on 7 out of 8 benchmarks, but there is no silver bullet found for the specific design choices of PnO.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-13T13:19:34Z)
• Model-based Causal Bayesian Optimization [74.78486244786083]
  We introduce the first algorithm for Causal Bayesian Optimization with Multiplicative Weights (CBO-MW) We derive regret bounds for CBO-MW that naturally depend on graph-related quantities. Our experiments include a realistic demonstration of how CBO-MW can be used to learn users' demand patterns in a shared mobility system.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-31T13:02:36Z)
• Model-based Causal Bayesian Optimization [78.120734120667]
  We propose model-based causal Bayesian optimization (MCBO) MCBO learns a full system model instead of only modeling intervention-reward pairs. Unlike in standard Bayesian optimization, our acquisition function cannot be evaluated in closed form.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-18T14:28:21Z)
• Multi-Fidelity Bayesian Optimization with Unreliable Information Sources [12.509709549771385]
  We propose rMFBO (robust MFBO) to make GP-based MFBO schemes robust to the addition of unreliable information sources. We demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed methodology on a number of numerical benchmarks. We expect rMFBO to be particularly useful to reliably include human experts with varying knowledge within BO processes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-25T11:47:33Z)
• A General Recipe for Likelihood-free Bayesian Optimization [115.82591413062546]
  We propose likelihood-free BO (LFBO) to extend BO to a broader class of models and utilities. LFBO directly models the acquisition function without having to separately perform inference with a probabilistic surrogate model. We show that computing the acquisition function in LFBO can be reduced to optimizing a weighted classification problem.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-27T03:55:27Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.