Automated Multi-Source Debugging and Natural Language Error Explanation for Dashboard Applications

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.15362v1
• Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2026 05:06:28 GMT
• Title: Automated Multi-Source Debugging and Natural Language Error Explanation for Dashboard Applications
• Abstract summary: This paper proposes a novel system for Automated Multi Source and Natural Language Error Explanation.<n>The proposed framework automatically collects and correlates error data from disparate sources such as browser, API, server logs and validates API contracts in real time.<n>This approach significantly reduces Mean Time to Resolution for support engineers and improves the user experience by transforming cryptic error codes into actionable insights.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Modern web dashboards and enterprise applications increasingly rely on complex, distributed microservices architectures. While these architectures offer scalability, they introduce significant challenges in debugging and observability. When failures occur, they often manifest as opaque error messages to the end-user such as Something went wrong. This masks the underlying root cause which may reside in browser side exceptions, API contract violations, or server side logic failures. Existing monitoring tools capture these events in isolation but fail to correlate them effectively or provide intelligible explanations to non technical users. This paper proposes a novel system for Automated Multi Source Debugging and Natural Language Error Explanation. The proposed framework automatically collects and correlates error data from disparate sources such as browser, API, server logs and validates API contracts in real time, and utilizes Large Language Models to generate natural language explanations. This approach significantly reduces Mean Time to Resolution for support engineers and improves the user experience by transforming cryptic error codes into actionable insights.

Related papers

• Benchmarking AI Agents for Hardware Design Automation via MCP Tool Calling [1.6639892342953113]
  We ask whether AI agents powered by locally deployed large language models can reliably automate expert-defined hardware design in an industry-realistic tool-calling setting.<n>To study this setting, we build a Model Context Protocol (MCP) server that reproduces the state and dependency logic of a proprietary hardware design tool used in embedded system development.<n>We evaluate seven open-source models comparing pipeline choices including system prompts, tool-description detail, context scope, and single-agent versus multi-agent architectures.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-25T15:33:50Z)
• FAMA: Failure-Aware Meta-Agentic Framework for Open-Source LLMs in Interactive Tool Use Environments [60.3427704389541]
  Large Language Models are being increasingly deployed as the decision-making core of autonomous agents.<n>Yet, in conversational benchmarks, these agents frequently fail due to the cascading effects of incorrect decision-making.<n>We present the Failure-Aware Meta-Agentic framework to tackle these challenges.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-28T02:21:53Z)
• Dynamic analysis enhances issue resolution [53.50448142467294]
  DAIRA (Dynamic Analysis-enhanced Issue Resolution Agent) is an automated repair framework that embeds dynamic analysis into the agent's reasoning cycle.<n> Driven by a Test Tracing-Driven methodology, DAIRA utilizes lightweight monitors to extract critical runtime data.<n>When powered by Gemini 3 Flash Preview, DAIRA establishes a new state-of-the-art (SOTA) performance, achieving a 79.4% resolution rate on the SWE-bench Verified dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-23T14:48:54Z)
• DeepFix: Debugging and Fixing Machine Learning Workflow using Agentic AI [0.0]
  DeepFix is a tool for automated testing of the entire machine learning pipeline using an agentic AI framework.<n>Our testing approach first leverages Deepchecks to test the ML software for any potential bugs, and thereafter, uses an agentic AI-based approach to generate a detailed bug report.<n>This includes a ranking, based on the severity of the found bugs, along with their explanations, which can be interpreted easily by any non-data science experts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-14T20:00:16Z)
• ErrorLLM: Modeling SQL Errors for Text-to-SQL Refinement [57.98138819417949]
  We propose ErrorLLM, a framework that explicitly models text-to- querying.<n>We show that ErrorLLM achieves the most significant improvements over backbone initial generation.<n>ErrorLLM addresses both sides by high detection F1 score while maintaining refinement effectiveness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-04T05:27:20Z)
• Past, Present, and Future of Bug Tracking in the Generative AI Era [1.3241176321860364]
  Traditional bug tracking systems rely heavily on manual reporting, reproduction, triaging, and resolution.<n>We propose an AI-powered bug tracking framework that augments existing tools with intelligent, large language model (LLM)-driven automation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-09T09:42:30Z)
• Detecting Pipeline Failures through Fine-Grained Analysis of Web Agents [0.48156730450374763]
  This work analyzes existing benchmarks and highlights the lack of fine-grained diagnostic tools.<n>We propose a modular evaluation framework that decomposes agent pipelines into interpretable stages for detailed error analysis.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-17T19:34:49Z)
• Towards Automated Error Discovery: A Study in Conversational AI [48.735443116662026]
  We introduce Automated Error Discovery, a framework for detecting and defining errors in conversational AI.<n>We also propose SEEED (Soft Clustering Extended-Based Error Detection), as an encoder-based approach to its implementation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-13T14:53:22Z)
• RepoDebug: Repository-Level Multi-Task and Multi-Language Debugging Evaluation of Large Language Models [49.83481415540291]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have exhibited significant proficiency in code debug.<n>This paper introduces Repo Debug, a multi-task and multi-language repository-level code debug dataset.<n>We conduct evaluation experiments on 10 LLMs, where Claude 3.5 Sonnect, the best-performing model, still cannot perform well in repository-level debug.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-04T10:13:21Z)
• A Framework for Testing and Adapting REST APIs as LLM Tools [11.757827071584737]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly used to build autonomous agents that perform complex tasks with external tools.<n>Current benchmarks overlook these challenges, leaving a gap in assessing API readiness for agent-driven automation.<n>We present a testing framework that systematically evaluates enterprise APIs when wrapped as Python tools for LLM-based agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-22T02:52:08Z)
• Beyond Final Code: A Process-Oriented Error Analysis of Software Development Agents in Real-World GitHub Scenarios [31.749442120603774]
  Python execution errors during the issue resolution phase correlate with lower resolution rates and increased reasoning overheads.<n>We have identified the most prevalent errors -- such as ModuleNotFoundError and TypeError -- and highlighted particularly challenging errors like OSError and database-related issues.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-16T06:24:51Z)
• Seeker: Towards Exception Safety Code Generation with Intermediate Language Agents Framework [58.36391985790157]
  In real world software development, improper or missing exception handling can severely impact the robustness and reliability of code.<n>We explore the use of large language models (LLMs) to improve exception handling in code.<n>We propose Seeker, a multi-agent framework inspired by expert developer strategies for exception handling.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-16T12:35:29Z)
• Using Developer Discussions to Guide Fixing Bugs in Software [51.00904399653609]
  We propose using bug report discussions, which are available before the task is performed and are also naturally occurring, avoiding the need for additional information from developers. We demonstrate that various forms of natural language context derived from such discussions can aid bug-fixing, even leading to improved performance over using commit messages corresponding to the oracle bug-fixing commits.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-11T16:37:33Z)
• Robust and Transferable Anomaly Detection in Log Data using Pre-Trained Language Models [59.04636530383049]
  Anomalies or failures in large computer systems, such as the cloud, have an impact on a large number of users. We propose a framework for anomaly detection in log data, as a major troubleshooting source of system information.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-23T09:17:05Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.