Revisiting Northrop Frye's Four Myths Theory with Large Language Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.15678v1
• Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2026 16:02:52 GMT
• Title: Revisiting Northrop Frye's Four Myths Theory with Large Language Models
• Abstract summary: Northrop Frye's theory of four fundamental narrative genres has profoundly influenced literary criticism.<n>We present a new character function framework that complements pattern-based analysis.<n>We derive four universal character functions (protagonist, mentor, antagonist, companion) by mapping them to Jung's psychic structure components.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Northrop Frye's theory of four fundamental narrative genres (comedy, romance, tragedy, satire) has profoundly influenced literary criticism, yet computational approaches to his framework have focused primarily on narrative patterns rather than character functions. In this paper, we present a new character function framework that complements pattern-based analysis by examining how archetypal roles manifest differently across Frye's genres. Drawing on Jungian archetype theory, we derive four universal character functions (protagonist, mentor, antagonist, companion) by mapping them to Jung's psychic structure components. These functions are then specialized into sixteen genre-specific roles based on prototypical works. To validate this framework, we conducted a multi-model study using six state-of-the-art Large Language Models (LLMs) to evaluate character-role correspondences across 40 narrative works. The validation employed both positive samples (160 valid correspondences) and negative samples (30 invalid correspondences) to evaluate whether models both recognize valid correspondences and reject invalid ones. LLMs achieved substantial performance (mean balanced accuracy of 82.5%) with strong inter-model agreement (Fleiss' $κ$ = 0.600), demonstrating that the proposed correspondences capture systematic structural patterns. Performance varied by genre (ranging from 72.7% to 89.9%) and role (52.5% to 99.2%), with qualitative analysis revealing that variations reflect genuine narrative properties, including functional distribution in romance and deliberate archetypal subversion in satire. This character-based approach demonstrates the potential of LLM-supported methods for computational narratology and provides a foundation for future development of narrative generation methods and interactive storytelling applications.

Related papers

• EduArt: An educational-level benchmark for evaluating art history knowledge in large language models [0.764671395172401]
  Existing art-focused evaluations rely on synthetic questions and rarely report item-level properties.<n>This paper introduces EduArt, an educational-level benchmark for art-historical knowledge and visual reasoning in multimodal LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-02T10:43:06Z)
• Towards a Linguistic Evaluation of Narratives: A Quantitative Stylistic Framework [51.56484100374058]
  This work proposes a quantitative approach to narrative assessment by focusing on the linguistic dimension as a primary indicator of quality.<n>The paper presents a methodology for the automatic evaluation of narrative based on the extraction of a comprehensive set of 33 quantitative linguistic features.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-21T09:21:40Z)
• How Well Do LLMs Imitate Human Writing Style? [2.3754840025365183]
  Large language models (LLMs) can generate fluent text, but their ability to replicate the distinctive style of a specific human author remains unclear.<n>We present a fast, training-free framework for authorship verification and style imitation analysis.<n>It achieves 97.5% accuracy on academic essays and 94.5% in cross-domain evaluation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-29T15:34:40Z)
• Causal Micro-Narratives [62.47217054314046]
  We present a novel approach to classify causal micro-narratives from text. These narratives are sentence-level explanations of the cause(s) and/or effect(s) of a target subject.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-07T17:55:10Z)
• On the Proper Treatment of Tokenization in Psycholinguistics [53.960910019072436]
  The paper argues that token-level language models should be marginalized into character-level language models before they are used in psycholinguistic studies.<n>We find various focal areas whose surprisal is a better psychometric predictor than the surprisal of the region of interest itself.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-03T17:18:03Z)
• GPT-4 Generated Narratives of Life Events using a Structured Narrative Prompt: A Validation Study [0.0]
  We employ a zero-shot structured narrative prompt to generate 24,000 narratives using OpenAI's GPT-4. From this dataset, we manually classify 2,880 narratives and evaluate their validity in conveying birth, death, hiring, and firing events. We extend our analysis to predict the classifications of the remaining 21,120 narratives.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-08T06:20:01Z)
• How Well Do Text Embedding Models Understand Syntax? [50.440590035493074]
  The ability of text embedding models to generalize across a wide range of syntactic contexts remains under-explored. Our findings reveal that existing text embedding models have not sufficiently addressed these syntactic understanding challenges. We propose strategies to augment the generalization ability of text embedding models in diverse syntactic scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-14T08:51:00Z)
• Better Zero-Shot Reasoning with Role-Play Prompting [10.90357246745529]
  Role-play prompting consistently surpasses the standard zero-shot approach across most datasets. This highlights its potential to augment the reasoning capabilities of large language models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-15T11:08:30Z)
• Feature Interactions Reveal Linguistic Structure in Language Models [2.0178765779788495]
  We study feature interactions in the context of feature attribution methods for post-hoc interpretability. We work out a grey box methodology, in which we train models to perfection on a formal language classification task. We show that under specific configurations, some methods are indeed able to uncover the grammatical rules acquired by a model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-21T11:24:41Z)
• Text Classification via Large Language Models [63.1874290788797]
  We introduce Clue And Reasoning Prompting (CARP) to address complex linguistic phenomena involved in text classification. Remarkably, CARP yields new SOTA performances on 4 out of 5 widely-used text-classification benchmarks. More importantly, we find that CARP delivers impressive abilities on low-resource and domain-adaptation setups.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-15T06:24:45Z)
• M-SENSE: Modeling Narrative Structure in Short Personal Narratives Using Protagonist's Mental Representations [14.64546899992196]
  We propose the task of automatically detecting prominent elements of the narrative structure by analyzing the role of characters' inferred mental state. We introduce a STORIES dataset of short personal narratives containing manual annotations of key elements of narrative structure, specifically climax and resolution. Our model is able to achieve significant improvements in the task of identifying climax and resolution.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-18T20:48:02Z)
• Tragic and Comical Networks. Clustering Dramatic Genres According to Structural Properties [0.0]
  A growing tradition in the joint field of network studies and drama history produces interpretations from the character networks of the plays. Our aim is to create a method that is able to cluster texts with similar structures on the basis of the play's well-interpretable and simple properties. Finding these features is the most important part of our research, as well as establishing the appropriate statistical procedure to calculate the similarities between the texts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-16T12:36:16Z)
• Large Language Models Are Latent Variable Models: Explaining and Finding Good Demonstrations for In-Context Learning [104.58874584354787]
  In recent years, pre-trained large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable efficiency in achieving an inference-time few-shot learning capability known as in-context learning. This study aims to examine the in-context learning phenomenon through a Bayesian lens, viewing real-world LLMs as latent variable models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-27T18:59:01Z)
• PART: Pre-trained Authorship Representation Transformer [52.623051272843426]
  Authors writing documents imprint identifying information within their texts.<n>Previous works use hand-crafted features or classification tasks to train their authorship models.<n>We propose a contrastively trained model fit to learn textbfauthorship embeddings instead of semantics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-30T11:08:39Z)
• Temporal Embeddings and Transformer Models for Narrative Text Understanding [72.88083067388155]
  We present two approaches to narrative text understanding for character relationship modelling. The temporal evolution of these relations is described by dynamic word embeddings, that are designed to learn semantic changes over time. A supervised learning approach based on the state-of-the-art transformer model BERT is used instead to detect static relations between characters.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-19T14:23:12Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.