From Conflicts to Collisions: A Two-Stage Collision Scenario-Testing Approach for Autonomous Driving Systems

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.15837v1
• Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2026 12:24:22 GMT
• Title: From Conflicts to Collisions: A Two-Stage Collision Scenario-Testing Approach for Autonomous Driving Systems
• Abstract summary: We introduce a collision-related concept of conflict as an intermediate search target.<n>We propose a two-stage scenario testing framework that first searches for conflicts and then mutates these conflict scenarios to induce actual collisions.
• Score: 9.14431445045481
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Autonomous driving systems (ADS) are safety-critical and require rigorous testing before public deployment. Simulation-based scenario testing provides a safe and cost-effective alternative to extensive on-road trials, enabling efficient evaluation of ADS under diverse and high-risk conditions. However, existing approaches mainly evaluates the scenarios based on their proximity to collisions and focus on scenarios already close to collision, leaving many other hazardous situations unexplored. To bridge this, we introduce a collision-related concept of conflict as an intermediate search target and propose a two-stage scenario testing framework that first searches for conflicts and then mutates these conflict scenarios to induce actual collisions. Evaluated on Baidu Apollo, our approach reveals up to 12 distinct collision types in a single run, doubling the diversity discovered by state-of-the-art baselines while requiring fewer simulations thanks to conflict-targeted mutations. These results show that using conflicts as intermediate objectives broadens the search horizon and significantly improves the efficiency and effectiveness of ADS safety evaluation.

Related papers

• Automatic Testing of Interacting Autonomous Vehicles [5.10779798572112]
  We propose EVITA, an approach that leverages multi-objective optimization to generate scenarios that trigger multiple interacting AVs.<n>The experimental results that we discuss in this paper confirm that EVITA triggers a higher variety of AVs interactions than state-of-the-art approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-14T07:28:43Z)
• From Attacks to Curricula: Learnability-Guided Adversarial Training for Safe Autonomous Driving [56.30087557121323]
  AlignADV is a learnability-guided closed-loop adversarial training framework.<n>It converts adversarial scenarios into resolvable and capability-aligned curricula.<n> Experiments show it reduces training steps by up to 40.6 percent.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-12T02:13:55Z)
• KG-ASG: Collision-Knowledge-Guided Closed-Loop Adversarial Scenario Generation With Primary-Support Attribution [11.204233852756808]
  KG-ASG is a collision-knowledge-guided closed-loop adversarial scenario generation framework with primary-support attribution.<n> Experiments on WOMD scenarios reconstructed in MetaDrive show that KG-ASG achieves strong adversarial effectiveness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-17T09:04:48Z)
• When Safety Collides: Resolving Multi-Category Harmful Conflicts in Text-to-Image Diffusion via Adaptive Safety Guidance [79.1968671824977]
  Text-to-Image (T2I) diffusion models have demonstrated significant advancements in generating high-quality images.<n>We propose Conflict-aware Adaptive Safety Guidance (CASG), a training-free framework that dynamically identifies and applies the category-aligned safety direction during generation.<n>Experiments on T2I safety benchmarks demonstrate CASG's state-of-the-art performance, reducing the harmful rate by up to 15.4% compared to existing methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-24T13:20:31Z)
• Controllable Collision Scenario Generation via Collision Pattern Prediction [22.736678908526653]
  We introduce controllable collision scenario generation, where the goal is to produce trajectories that realize a user-specified collision type and time-to-accident (TTA)<n>We propose a framework that predicts Collision Pattern, a compact and interpretable representation that captures the spatial configuration of the ego and the adversarial vehicles at impact.<n>Experiments show that our approach outperforms strong baselines in both collision rate and controllability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-14T06:56:33Z)
• Steerable Adversarial Scenario Generation through Test-Time Preference Alignment [58.37104890690234]
  Adversarial scenario generation is a cost-effective approach for safety assessment of autonomous driving systems.<n>We introduce a new framework named textbfSteerable textbfAdversarial scenario textbfGEnerator (SAGE)<n>SAGE enables fine-grained test-time control over the trade-off between adversariality and realism without any retraining.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-24T13:27:35Z)
• Adversarial Generation and Collaborative Evolution of Safety-Critical Scenarios for Autonomous Vehicles [47.25901323750217]
  The generation of safety-critical scenarios in simulation has become increasingly crucial for safety evaluation in autonomous vehicles prior to road deployment in society.<n>We propose ScenGE, a framework that can generate plentiful safety-critical scenarios by reasoning novel adversarial cases and then amplifying them with complex traffic flows.<n>We validate our framework through real-world vehicle tests and human evaluation, confirming that the generated scenarios are both plausible and critical.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-20T08:36:57Z)
• Causality-aware Safety Testing for Autonomous Driving Systems [12.138537069776884]
  Comprehensive evaluation requires testing across diverse scenarios that can trigger various types of violations under different conditions.<n>We propose a novel Causal-aware fuzzing technique to enable efficient comprehensive testing of Autonomous Driving Systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-10T10:53:26Z)
• Black-Box Adversarial Attack on Vision Language Models for Autonomous Driving [65.61999354218628]
  We take the first step toward designing black-box adversarial attacks specifically targeting vision-language models (VLMs) in autonomous driving systems.<n>We propose Cascading Adversarial Disruption (CAD), which targets low-level reasoning breakdown by generating and injecting semantics.<n>We present Risky Scene Induction, which addresses dynamic adaptation by leveraging a surrogate VLM to understand and construct high-level risky scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-23T11:10:02Z)
• ICSFuzz: Collision Detector Bug Discovery in Autonomous Driving Simulators [11.343198884451166]
  This paper aims to systematically discover ignored collision scenarios to improve the reliability of autonomous driving simulators. We present ICSFuzz, a black-box fuzzing approach to discover ignored collision scenarios efficiently. We compare ICSFuzz with DriveFuzz, a state-of-the-art simulation-based ADS testing method, by replacing its oracle with our ignored-collision-aware oracle.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-11T04:48:54Z)
• LMM-enhanced Safety-Critical Scenario Generation for Autonomous Driving System Testing From Non-Accident Traffic Videos [22.638869562921133]
  It is paramount to generate a diverse range of safety-critical test scenarios for autonomous driving systems.<n>Some accident-free real-world scenarios can not only lead to misbehaviors in ADSs but also be leveraged for the generation of ADS violations.<n>It is of significant importance to discover safety violations of ADSs from routine traffic scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-16T09:05:56Z)
• PAFOT: A Position-Based Approach for Finding Optimal Tests of Autonomous Vehicles [4.243926243206826]
  This paper proposes PAFOT, a position-based approach testing framework. PAFOT generates adversarial driving scenarios to expose safety violations of Automated Driving Systems. Experiments show PAFOT can effectively generate safety-critical scenarios to crash ADSs and is able to find collisions in a short simulation time.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-06T10:04:40Z)
• SAFE-SIM: Safety-Critical Closed-Loop Traffic Simulation with Diffusion-Controllable Adversaries [94.84458417662407]
  We introduce SAFE-SIM, a controllable closed-loop safety-critical simulation framework. Our approach yields two distinct advantages: 1) generating realistic long-tail safety-critical scenarios that closely reflect real-world conditions, and 2) providing controllable adversarial behavior for more comprehensive and interactive evaluations. We validate our framework empirically using the nuScenes and nuPlan datasets across multiple planners, demonstrating improvements in both realism and controllability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-31T04:14:43Z)
• A Counterfactual Safety Margin Perspective on the Scoring of Autonomous Vehicles' Riskiness [52.27309191283943]
  This paper presents a data-driven framework for assessing the risk of different AVs' behaviors. We propose the notion of counterfactual safety margin, which represents the minimum deviation from nominal behavior that could cause a collision.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-02T09:48:08Z)
• Congestion-aware Multi-agent Trajectory Prediction for Collision Avoidance [110.63037190641414]
  We propose to learn congestion patterns explicitly and devise a novel "Sense--Learn--Reason--Predict" framework. By decomposing the learning phases into two stages, a "student" can learn contextual cues from a "teacher" while generating collision-free trajectories. In experiments, we demonstrate that the proposed model is able to generate collision-free trajectory predictions in a synthetic dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-26T02:42:33Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.