Queer NLP: A Critical Survey on Literature Gaps, Biases and Trends

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.16151v1
• Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2026 02:54:28 GMT
• Title: Queer NLP: A Critical Survey on Literature Gaps, Biases and Trends
• Authors: Sabine Weber, Angelina Wang, Ankush Gupta, Arjun Subramonian, Dennis Ulmer, Eshaan Tanwar, Geetanjali Aich, Hannah Devinney, Jacob Hobbs, Jennifer Mickel, Joshua Tint, Mae Sosto, Ray Groshan, Simone Astarita, Vagrant Gautam, Verena Blaschke, William Agnew, Wilson Y Lee, Yanan Long,
• Abstract summary: We examine NLP research papers that explicitly address the relationship between LGBTQIA+ communities and NLP technologies.<n>We find that while the number of papers on queer NLP has grown within the last few years, most papers take a reactive rather than a proactive approach.<n>This survey is a call to action for work towards more just and inclusive NLP technologies.
• Score: 17.135026716123047
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: Natural language processing (NLP) technologies are rapidly reshaping how language is created, processed, and analyzed by humans. With current and potential applications in hiring, law, healthcare, and other areas that impact people's lives, understanding and mitigating harms towards marginalized groups is critical. In this survey, we examine NLP research papers that explicitly address the relationship between LGBTQIA+ communities and NLP technologies. We systematically review all such papers published in the ACL Anthology, to answer the following research questions: (1) What are current research trends? (2) What gaps exist in terms of topics and methods? (3) What areas are open for future work? We find that while the number of papers on queer NLP has grown within the last few years, most papers take a reactive rather than a proactive approach, pointing out bias more often than mitigating it, and focusing on shortcomings of existing systems rather than creating new solutions. Our survey uncovers many opportunities for future work, especially regarding stakeholder involvement, intersectionality, interdisciplinarity, and languages other than English. We also offer an outlook from a queer studies perspective, highlighting understudied topics and gaps in the harms addressed in NLP papers. Beyond being a roadmap of what has been done, this survey is a call to action for work towards more just and inclusive NLP technologies.

Related papers

• A Survey on Stereotype Detection in Natural Language Processing [46.27245894098319]
  Stereotypes influence social perceptions and can escalate into discrimination and violence.<n>This work is presented a survey of existing research, analyzing definitions from psychology, sociology, and philosophy.<n>Findings emphasize stereotype detection as a potential early-monitoring tool to prevent bias escalation and the rise of hate speech.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-23T09:03:56Z)
• What Can Natural Language Processing Do for Peer Review? [173.8912784451817]
  In modern science, peer review is widely used, yet it is hard, time-consuming, and prone to error. Since the artifacts involved in peer review are largely text-based, Natural Language Processing has great potential to improve reviewing. We detail each step of the process from manuscript submission to camera-ready revision, and discuss the associated challenges and opportunities for NLP assistance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-10T16:06:43Z)
• White Men Lead, Black Women Help? Benchmarking and Mitigating Language Agency Social Biases in LLMs [58.27353205269664]
  Social biases can manifest in language agency in Large Language Model (LLM)-generated content.<n>We introduce the Language Agency Bias Evaluation benchmark, which comprehensively evaluates biases in LLMs.<n>Using LABE, we unveil language agency social biases in 3 recent LLMs: ChatGPT, Llama3, and Mistral.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-16T12:27:54Z)
• Beyond Good Intentions: Reporting the Research Landscape of NLP for Social Good [115.1507728564964]
  We introduce NLP4SG Papers, a scientific dataset with three associated tasks. These tasks help identify NLP4SG papers and characterize the NLP4SG landscape. We use state-of-the-art NLP models to address each of these tasks and use them on the entire ACL Anthology.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-09T14:16:25Z)
• Thorny Roses: Investigating the Dual Use Dilemma in Natural Language Processing [45.72382504913193]
  We conduct a survey of NLP researchers and practitioners to understand the depth and their perspective of the problem. Based on the results of our survey, we offer a definition of dual use that is tailored to the needs of the NLP community. We discuss the current state and potential means for mitigating dual use in NLP and propose a checklist that can be integrated into existing conference ethics-frameworks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-17T14:37:43Z)
• A Major Obstacle for NLP Research: Let's Talk about Time Allocation! [25.820755718678786]
  This paper argues that we have been less successful than we should have been in the field of natural language processing. We demonstrate that, in recent years, subpar time allocation has been a major obstacle for NLP research.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-30T10:00:12Z)
• Ensuring the Inclusive Use of Natural Language Processing in the Global Response to COVID-19 [58.720142291102135]
  We discuss ways in which current and future NLP approaches can be made more inclusive by covering low-resource languages. We suggest several future directions for researchers interested in maximizing the positive societal impacts of NLP.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-08-11T12:54:26Z)
• Grounding 'Grounding' in NLP [59.28887479119075]
  As a community, we use the term broadly to reference any linking of text to data or non-textual modality. Cognitive Science more formally defines "grounding" as the process of establishing what mutual information is required for successful communication.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-04T00:40:59Z)
• A survey on extremism analysis using Natural Language Processing [7.885207996427683]
  This survey aims to review the contributions of NLP to the field of extremism research. The content includes a description and comparison of the frequently used NLP techniques, how they were applied and the insights they provided. future trends, challenges and directions derived from these highlights are suggested.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-28T11:05:43Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.