Lost Before Translation: Social Information Transmission and Survival in AI-AI Communication

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.17674v1
• Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2026 17:18:46 GMT
• Title: Lost Before Translation: Social Information Transmission and Survival in AI-AI Communication
• Authors: Bijean Ghafouri, Emilio Ferrara,
• Abstract summary: We study what happens when AI talks to AI.<n>In five studies tracking content through AI transmission chains, we find three consistent patterns.<n>We show that the properties that make AI-mediated content appear authoritative may systematically erode the cognitive and affective diversity on which informed judgment depends.
• Score: 7.593123083236325
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: When AI systems summarize and relay information, they inevitably transform it. But how? We introduce an experimental paradigm based on the telephone game to study what happens when AI talks to AI. Across five studies tracking content through AI transmission chains, we find three consistent patterns. The first is convergence, where texts differing in certainty, emotional intensity, and perspectival balance collapse toward a shared default of moderate confidence, muted affect, and analytical structure. The second is selective survival, where narrative anchors persist while the texture of evidence, hedges, quotes, and attributions is stripped away. The third is competitive filtering, where strong arguments survive while weaker but valid considerations disappear when multiple viewpoints coexist. In downstream experiments, human participants rated AI-transmitted content as more credible and polished. Importantly, however, humans also showed degraded factual recall, reduced perception of balance, and diminished emotional resonance. We show that the properties that make AI-mediated content appear authoritative may systematically erode the cognitive and affective diversity on which informed judgment depends.

Related papers

• Future You: Designing and Evaluating Multimodal AI-generated Digital Twins for Strengthening Future Self-Continuity [25.629127439391166]
  We report a randomized controlled study evaluating three modalities of AI-generated future selves (text, voice, avatar) against a neutral control condition.<n>All personalized modalities strengthened Future Self-Continuity (FSC), emotional well-being, and motivation compared to control, with avatar producing the largest vividness gains.<n> Interaction quality metrics, particularly persuasiveness, realism, and user engagement, emerged as robust predictors of psychological and affective outcomes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-05T19:24:18Z)
• AI Deception: Risks, Dynamics, and Controls [153.71048309527225]
  This project provides a comprehensive and up-to-date overview of the AI deception field.<n>We identify a formal definition of AI deception, grounded in signaling theory from studies of animal deception.<n>We organize the landscape of AI deception research as a deception cycle, consisting of two key components: deception emergence and deception treatment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-27T16:56:04Z)
• Beyond Hallucinations: The Illusion of Understanding in Large Language Models [0.0]
  Large language models (LLMs) are becoming deeply embedded in human communication and decision-making.<n>They inherit the ambiguity, bias, and lack of direct access to truth inherent in language itself.<n>This paper argues that LLMs operationalize System 1 cognition at scale: fast, associative, and persuasive, but without reflection or falsification.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-16T13:19:44Z)
• Making AI Inevitable: Historical Perspective and the Problems of Predicting Long-Term Technological Change [0.0]
  It focuses on the deep disagreements over whether artificial general intelligence will prove transformative for human society.<n>The study begins by distinguishing two fundamental camps in this debate.<n>It shows the wide range of different arguments used to justify either the transformationalist or skeptical position.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-21T21:18:37Z)
• Almost AI, Almost Human: The Challenge of Detecting AI-Polished Writing [55.2480439325792]
  This study systematically evaluations twelve state-of-the-art AI-text detectors using our AI-Polished-Text Evaluation dataset.<n>Our findings reveal that detectors frequently flag even minimally polished text as AI-generated, struggle to differentiate between degrees of AI involvement, and exhibit biases against older and smaller models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-21T18:45:37Z)
• OceanChat: The Effect of Virtual Conversational AI Agents on Sustainable Attitude and Behavior Change [70.24245082578167]
  This paper presents OceanChat, an interactive system leveraging large language models to create conversational AI agents represented as animated marine creatures.<n>By balancing anthropomorphism with species authenticity, OceanChat demonstrates how interactive narratives can bridge the gap between environmental knowledge and real-world behavior change.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-05T03:45:33Z)
• Human Bias in the Face of AI: Examining Human Judgment Against Text Labeled as AI Generated [48.70176791365903]
  This study explores how bias shapes the perception of AI versus human generated content.<n>We investigated how human raters respond to labeled and unlabeled content.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-29T04:31:45Z)
• Fairness in AI and Its Long-Term Implications on Society [68.8204255655161]
  We take a closer look at AI fairness and analyze how lack of AI fairness can lead to deepening of biases over time. We discuss how biased models can lead to more negative real-world outcomes for certain groups. If the issues persist, they could be reinforced by interactions with other risks and have severe implications on society in the form of social unrest.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-16T11:22:59Z)
• The Who in XAI: How AI Background Shapes Perceptions of AI Explanations [61.49776160925216]
  We conduct a mixed-methods study of how two different groups--people with and without AI background--perceive different types of AI explanations. We find that (1) both groups showed unwarranted faith in numbers for different reasons and (2) each group found value in different explanations beyond their intended design.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-28T17:32:04Z)
• Theoretical Modeling of Communication Dynamics [0.0]
  Reputation game focuses on the trustworthiness of the participating agents, their honesty as perceived by others. Various sender and receiver strategies are studied, like sycophant, egocentricity, pathological lying, and aggressiveness for senders. Minimalist malicious strategies are identified, like being manipulative, dominant, or destructive, which significantly increase reputation at others' costs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-09T22:02:19Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.