Strange Undercurrents: A Critical Outlook on AI's Cultural Influence

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.17841v1
• Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2026 21:07:56 GMT
• Title: Strange Undercurrents: A Critical Outlook on AI's Cultural Influence
• Authors: Dejan Grba,
• Abstract summary: generative artificial intelligence (generative AI) is being examined extensively.<n>This paper summarizes a broader study of AI's influence on art notions focusing on the confluence of certain foundational concepts in computer science and ideological vectors of the AI industry that transfer into art, culture, and society.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: While generative artificial intelligence (generative AI) is being examined extensively, some issues it epitomizes call for more refined scrutiny and deeper contextualization. Besides the lack of nuanced understanding of art's continuously changing character in discussions about generative AI's cultural impact, one of the notably underexplored aspects is the conceptual and ideological substrate of AI science and industry whose attributes generative AI propagates by fostering the integration of diverse modes of AI-powered artmaking into the mainstream culture and economy. Taking the current turmoil around the generative AI as a pretext, this paper summarizes a broader study of AI's influence on art notions focusing on the confluence of certain foundational concepts in computer science and ideological vectors of the AI industry that transfer into art, culture, and society. This influence merges diverse and sometimes inconsistent but somehow coalescing philosophical premises, technical ideas, and political views, many of which have unfavorable overtones.

Related papers

• Deep Else: A Critical Framework for AI Art [0.0]
  I present a framework for the critical exploration of AI art.<n>I focus on the works that exemplify poetic complexity.<n>I outline the prospective strategies to advance the field.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-23T12:03:13Z)
• Art Notions in the Age of (Mis)anthropic AI [0.0]
  I take the cultural effects of generative artificial intelligence (generative AI) as a context for examining a broader perspective of AI's impact on contemporary art notions.<n>I summarize the distinct but often confused aspects of art notions and review the principal lines in which AI influences them.<n>I introduce several viewpoints for a further critique of AI's cultural zeitgeist.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-20T13:27:28Z)
• The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Traditional Art Forms: A Disruption or Enhancement [0.0]
  We look at the ways that recent technologies like Geneversarative Adrial Networks and Diffusion Models are changing the fields of painting, sculpture, calligraphy, dance, music, and the arts of craft.<n>Using examples and data, we illustrate the ways that AI can democratize creative expression, improve productivity, and preserve cultural heritage.<n>We advocate for the development of ethical guidelines, collaborative approaches, and inclusive technology development.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-07T16:37:04Z)
• The Shady Light of Art Automation [0.0]
  The paper summarizes a broader study of the roles that AI's conceptual and ideological substrata play in influencing art notions.<n>The focus is on divergent but coalescing and often questionable ideas, values, and political views that generative AI and other art-related AI technologies propagate.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-26T12:50:05Z)
• Aligning Generalisation Between Humans and Machines [74.120848518198]
  AI technology can support humans in scientific discovery and forming decisions, but may also disrupt democracies and target individuals.<n>The responsible use of AI and its participation in human-AI teams increasingly shows the need for AI alignment.<n>A crucial yet often overlooked aspect of these interactions is the different ways in which humans and machines generalise.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-23T18:36:07Z)
• Toward an Artist-Centred AI [0.0]
  This paper contextualizes the notions of suitability and desirability of principles, practices, and tools related to the use of AI in the arts. It was composed by examining the challenges that AI poses to art production, distribution, consumption, and monetization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-13T09:43:23Z)
• Now, Later, and Lasting: Ten Priorities for AI Research, Policy, and Practice [63.20307830884542]
  Next several decades may well be a turning point for humanity, comparable to the industrial revolution. Launched a decade ago, the project is committed to a perpetual series of studies by multidisciplinary experts. We offer ten recommendations for action that collectively address both the short- and long-term potential impacts of AI technologies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-06T22:18:31Z)
• The Mechanical Turkness: Tactical Media Art and the Critique of Corporate AI [0.0]
  I discuss art practices that thematize creative agency, crowdsourced labor, and delegated artmaking to reveal the social rootage of AI technologies. I focus on works whose poetic features indicate broader issues of contemporary AI-influenced science, technology, economy, and society.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-27T13:16:50Z)
• Fairness in Agreement With European Values: An Interdisciplinary Perspective on AI Regulation [61.77881142275982]
  This interdisciplinary position paper considers various concerns surrounding fairness and discrimination in AI, and discusses how AI regulations address them. We first look at AI and fairness through the lenses of law, (AI) industry, sociotechnology, and (moral) philosophy, and present various perspectives. We identify and propose the roles AI Regulation should take to make the endeavor of the AI Act a success in terms of AI fairness concerns.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-08T12:32:08Z)
• Building Bridges: Generative Artworks to Explore AI Ethics [56.058588908294446]
  In recent years, there has been an increased emphasis on understanding and mitigating adverse impacts of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies on society. A significant challenge in the design of ethical AI systems is that there are multiple stakeholders in the AI pipeline, each with their own set of constraints and interests. This position paper outlines some potential ways in which generative artworks can play this role by serving as accessible and powerful educational tools.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-25T22:31:55Z)
• An interdisciplinary conceptual study of Artificial Intelligence (AI) for helping benefit-risk assessment practices: Towards a comprehensive qualification matrix of AI programs and devices (pre-print 2020) [55.41644538483948]
  This paper proposes a comprehensive analysis of existing concepts coming from different disciplines tackling the notion of intelligence. The aim is to identify shared notions or discrepancies to consider for qualifying AI systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-07T12:01:31Z)
• The Short Anthropological Guide to the Study of Ethical AI [91.3755431537592]
  Short guide serves as both an introduction to AI ethics and social science and anthropological perspectives on the development of AI. Aims to provide those unfamiliar with the field with an insight into the societal impact of AI systems and how, in turn, these systems can lead us to rethink how our world operates.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-07T12:25:03Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.