Role and Identity Work of Software Engineering Professionals in the Generative AI Era

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.18190v1
• Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2026 12:53:43 GMT
• Title: Role and Identity Work of Software Engineering Professionals in the Generative AI Era
• Authors: Jorge Melegati,
• Abstract summary: We argue the need for considering the role as a factor defining the identity work of software professionals.<n>We propose a research agenda to better understand how the role influences identity work of software professionals triggered by the adoption of GenAI.
• Score: 0.7106986689736825
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: The adoption of Generative AI (GenAI) suggests major changes for software engineering, including technical aspects but also human aspects of the professionals involved. One of these aspects is how individuals perceive themselves regarding their work, i.e., their work identity, and the processes they perform to form, adapt and reject these identities, i.e., identity work. Existent studies provide evidence of such identity work of software professionals triggered by the adoption of GenAI, however they do not consider differences among diverse roles, such as developers and testers. In this paper, we argue the need for considering the role as a factor defining the identity work of software professionals. To support our claim, we review some studies regarding different roles and also recent studies on how to adopt GenAI in software engineering. Then, we propose a research agenda to better understand how the role influences identity work of software professionals triggered by the adoption of GenAI, and, based on that, to propose new artifacts to support this adoption. We also discuss the potential implications for practice of the results to be obtained.

Related papers

• Adoption of Generative Artificial Intelligence in the German Software Engineering Industry: An Empirical Study [9.442926409509038]
  Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) tools have seen rapid adoption among software developers.<n>While adoption rates in the industry are rising, the underlying factors influencing the effective use of these tools have not been thoroughly investigated.<n>This issue is particularly relevant in environments with stringent regulatory requirements, such as Germany.<n>No empirical study has systematically examined the adoption dynamics of GenAI tools within the German context.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-23T12:42:33Z)
• Product Manager Practices for Delegating Work to Generative AI: "Accountability must not be delegated to non-human actors" [14.99180726933919]
  Generative AI (GenAI) is changing the nature of knowledge work, particularly for Product Managers (PMs) in software development teams.<n>We conducted a mixed-methods study at Microsoft, a large, multinational software company.<n>We contribute: (1) PMs' current GenAI adoption rates, uses cases, and perceived benefits and barriers; (2) a framework capturing how PMs assess which tasks to delegate to GenAI; and (3) PMs adaptation practices for integrating GenAI into their roles and perceptions of how their role is evolving.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-02T19:19:49Z)
• Generative AI in Training and Coaching: Redefining the Design Process of Learning Materials [44.99833362998488]
  We explore how AI integrates into the design process of learning materials, assessing its impact on efficiency, pedagogical quality, and the evolving role of human trainers and coaches.<n>Through qualitative interviews with professionals in education and corporate training, we identify the following key topics.<n>We derive how tools based on GenAI can successfully be implemented for trainers and coaches on an individual, organizational, systemic, and strategic level.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-06T03:42:43Z)
• AI in Software Engineering: Perceived Roles and Their Impact on Adoption [0.0]
  This paper investigates how developers conceptualize AI-powered Development Tools.<n>We identify two primary Mental Models: AI as an inanimate tool and AI as a human-like teammate.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-29T00:37:49Z)
• Generative AI and Empirical Software Engineering: A Paradigm Shift [9.284024538100063]
  This vision paper examines how the integration of large language models into software engineering disrupts established research paradigms.<n>We discuss how it transforms the phenomena we study, the methods and theories we rely on, the data we analyze, and the threats to validity that arise in dynamic AI-mediated environments.<n>Our aim is to help the empirical software engineering community adapt its questions, instruments, and validation standards to a future in which AI systems are not merely tools, but active collaborators shaping software engineering and its study.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-12T04:13:07Z)
• LLMs Integration in Software Engineering Team Projects: Roles, Impact, and a Pedagogical Design Space for AI Tools in Computing Education [7.058964784190549]
  This work takes a pedagogical lens to explore the implications of generative AI (GenAI) models and tools, such as ChatGPT and GitHub Copilot. Our results address a particular gap in understanding the role and implications of GenAI on teamwork, team-efficacy, and team dynamics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-30T14:43:33Z)
• Hey GPT, Can You be More Racist? Analysis from Crowdsourced Attempts to Elicit Biased Content from Generative AI [41.96102438774773]
  This work presents the findings from a university-level competition, which challenged participants to design prompts for eliciting biased outputs from GenAI tools. We quantitatively and qualitatively analyze the competition submissions and identify a diverse set of biases in GenAI and strategies employed by participants to induce bias in GenAI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-20T18:44:45Z)
• Generative AI in the Software Engineering Domain: Tensions of Occupational Identity and Patterns of Identity Protection [4.268049805078337]
  We build on the theoretical lenses of occupational identity and self-determination theory to understand how and why software engineers make sense of generative artificial intelligence (GAI) We find that engineers' sense-making is contingent on domain expertise, as juniors and seniors felt their needs for competence, autonomy, and relatedness to be differently impacted by GAI. We propose design guidelines on how organizations and system designers can facilitate the impact of technological change on workers' occupational identity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-04T16:20:39Z)
• Beyond Recommender: An Exploratory Study of the Effects of Different AI Roles in AI-Assisted Decision Making [48.179458030691286]
  We examine three AI roles: Recommender, Analyzer, and Devil's Advocate. Our results show each role's distinct strengths and limitations in task performance, reliance appropriateness, and user experience. These insights offer valuable implications for designing AI assistants with adaptive functional roles according to different situations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-04T07:32:28Z)
• Explainable Authorship Identification in Cultural Heritage Applications: Analysis of a New Perspective [48.031678295495574]
  We explore the applicability of existing general-purpose eXplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) techniques to AId. In particular, we assess the relative merits of three different types of XAI techniques on three different AId tasks. Our analysis shows that, while these techniques make important first steps towards explainable Authorship Identification, more work remains to be done.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-03T20:51:15Z)
• Investigating Explainability of Generative AI for Code through Scenario-based Design [44.44517254181818]
  generative AI (GenAI) technologies are maturing and being applied to application domains such as software engineering. We conduct 9 workshops with 43 software engineers in which real examples from state-of-the-art generative AI models were used to elicit users' explainability needs. Our work explores explainability needs for GenAI for code and demonstrates how human-centered approaches can drive the technical development of XAI in novel domains.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-10T08:52:39Z)
• AI Explainability 360: Impact and Design [120.95633114160688]
  In 2019, we created AI Explainability 360 (Arya et al. 2020), an open source software toolkit featuring ten diverse and state-of-the-art explainability methods. This paper examines the impact of the toolkit with several case studies, statistics, and community feedback. The paper also describes the flexible design of the toolkit, examples of its use, and the significant educational material and documentation available to its users.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-24T19:17:09Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.