Exploring the Ethical Concerns in User Reviews of Mental Health Apps using Topic Modeling and Sentiment Analysis

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.18454v1
• Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2026 16:35:27 GMT
• Title: Exploring the Ethical Concerns in User Reviews of Mental Health Apps using Topic Modeling and Sentiment Analysis
• Authors: Mohammad Masudur Rahman, Beenish Moalla Chaudhry,
• Abstract summary: The rapid growth of AI-driven mental health mobile apps has raised concerns about their ethical considerations and user trust.<n>This study proposed a natural language processing (NLP)-based framework to evaluate ethical aspects from user-generated reviews.
• Score: 5.226908304522686
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: The rapid growth of AI-driven mental health mobile apps has raised concerns about their ethical considerations and user trust. This study proposed a natural language processing (NLP)-based framework to evaluate ethical aspects from user-generated reviews from the Google Play Store and Apple App Store. After gathering and cleaning the data, topic modeling was applied to identify latent themes in the context of ethics using topic words and then map them to well-recognized existing ethical principles described in different ethical frameworks; in addition to that, a bottom-up approach is applied to find any new and emergent ethics from the reviews using a transformer-based zero-shot classification model. Sentiment analysis was then used to capture how users feel about each ethical aspect. The obtained results reveal that well-known ethical considerations are not enough for the modern AI-based technologies and are missing emerging ethical challenges, showing how these apps either uphold or overlook key moral values. This work contributes to developing an ongoing evaluation system that can enhance the fairness, transparency, and trustworthiness of AI-powered mental health chatbots.

Related papers

• EthicsMH: A Pilot Benchmark for Ethical Reasoning in Mental Health AI [0.2538209532048867]
  This dataset is a pilot dataset of 125 scenarios designed to evaluate how AI systems navigate ethically charged situations.<n>EthicsMH establishes a task framework that bridges AI ethics and mental health decision-making.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-15T07:35:35Z)
• Ethical Aspects of the Use of Social Robots in Elderly Care -- A Systematic Qualitative Review [0.0]
  The use of social robotics in elderly care is increasingly discussed as one way of meeting emerging care needs due to scarce resources.<n>This review develops an overview on ethical aspects of the use of social robots in elderly care from a decision-makers' perspective.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-14T08:46:24Z)
• A Conceptual Framework for Ethical Evaluation of Machine Learning Systems [12.887834116390358]
  Ethical implications appear when designing evaluations of machine learning systems. We present a utility framework, characterizing the key trade-off in ethical evaluation as balancing information gain against potential ethical harms. Our analysis underscores the critical need for development teams to deliberately assess and manage ethical complexities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-05T01:06:49Z)
• Ethical-Lens: Curbing Malicious Usages of Open-Source Text-to-Image Models [51.69735366140249]
  We introduce Ethical-Lens, a framework designed to facilitate the value-aligned usage of text-to-image tools.<n>Ethical-Lens ensures value alignment in text-to-image models across toxicity and bias dimensions.<n>Our experiments reveal that Ethical-Lens enhances alignment capabilities to levels comparable with or superior to commercial models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-18T11:38:25Z)
• Eagle: Ethical Dataset Given from Real Interactions [74.7319697510621]
  We create datasets extracted from real interactions between ChatGPT and users that exhibit social biases, toxicity, and immoral problems. Our experiments show that Eagle captures complementary aspects, not covered by existing datasets proposed for evaluation and mitigation of such ethical challenges.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-22T03:46:02Z)
• Generative Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare: Ethical Considerations and Assessment Checklist [10.980912140648648]
  We conduct a scoping review of ethical discussions on generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) in healthcare. We propose to reduce the gaps by developing a checklist for comprehensive assessment and transparent documentation of ethical discussions in GenAI research.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-02T11:55:07Z)
• Towards A Unified Utilitarian Ethics Framework for Healthcare Artificial Intelligence [0.08192907805418582]
  This study attempts to identify the major ethical principles influencing the utility performance of AI at different technological levels. Justice, privacy, bias, lack of regulations, risks, and interpretability are the most important principles to consider for ethical AI. We propose a new utilitarian ethics-based theoretical framework for designing ethical AI for the healthcare domain.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-26T02:10:58Z)
• Ethics in conversation: Building an ethics assurance case for autonomous AI-enabled voice agents in healthcare [1.8964739087256175]
  The principles-based ethics assurance argument pattern is one proposal in the AI ethics landscape. This paper presents the interim findings of a case study applying this ethics assurance framework to the use of Dora, an AI-based telemedicine system.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-23T16:04:59Z)
• The Role of AI in Drug Discovery: Challenges, Opportunities, and Strategies [97.5153823429076]
  The benefits, challenges and drawbacks of AI in this field are reviewed. The use of data augmentation, explainable AI, and the integration of AI with traditional experimental methods are also discussed.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-08T23:23:39Z)
• Metaethical Perspectives on 'Benchmarking' AI Ethics [81.65697003067841]
  Benchmarks are seen as the cornerstone for measuring technical progress in Artificial Intelligence (AI) research. An increasingly prominent research area in AI is ethics, which currently has no set of benchmarks nor commonly accepted way for measuring the 'ethicality' of an AI system. We argue that it makes more sense to talk about 'values' rather than 'ethics' when considering the possible actions of present and future AI systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-11T14:36:39Z)
• Case Study: Deontological Ethics in NLP [119.53038547411062]
  We study one ethical theory, namely deontological ethics, from the perspective of NLP. In particular, we focus on the generalization principle and the respect for autonomy through informed consent. We provide four case studies to demonstrate how these principles can be used with NLP systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-09T16:04:51Z)
• Scruples: A Corpus of Community Ethical Judgments on 32,000 Real-Life Anecdotes [72.64975113835018]
  Motivated by descriptive ethics, we investigate a novel, data-driven approach to machine ethics. We introduce Scruples, the first large-scale dataset with 625,000 ethical judgments over 32,000 real-life anecdotes. Our dataset presents a major challenge to state-of-the-art neural language models, leaving significant room for improvement.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-20T17:34:15Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.