Correcting coherent quantum errors by going with the flow
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.21076v2
- Date: Mon, 02 Mar 2026 23:08:47 GMT
- Title: Correcting coherent quantum errors by going with the flow
- Authors: Wayne M. Witzel, Anand Ganti, Tzvetan S. Metodi,
- Abstract summary: We show that the logical qubit performance beyond distance 3 for correlated single-qubit Hamiltonian noise models (i.e., global errant qubit rotations) matches the performance of Pauli noise model with the same process fidelity (fidelity after one application)<n>In a more general circuit model of noise, correlations may add constructively within syndrome extraction rounds but Pauli frame randomization from passive error correction mitigates this effect across multiple rounds.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: The performance of a given quantum error correction (QEC) code depends upon the noise model that is assumed. Independent Pauli noise, applied after each quantum operation, is a simplistic noise model that is easy to simulate and understand in the context of stabilizer codes. Although such a noise model is artificial, it is equivalent to independent, random, unbiased qubit rotations. What about spatially or temporally correlated qubit rotations? Such a noise model is applicable to global operations (e.g., NMR or ESR), common control sources (e.g., lasers), or slow drift (e.g., charge or magnetic noise) in various qubit technologies. In the worst case, such errors can combine constructively and result in a post-correction failure rate that increases with the number of error correction cycles. However, we show that this worst case does not generally arise unless taking active corrective actions while performing QEC. That is, by employing virtual Pauli frame updates ("passive" error correction) rather than physical corrections ("active" error correction), coherent errors do not compound appreciably. Starting in a random Pauli frame is also advantageous. In fact, through perturbation theory arguments and supporting numerical simulations, we show that the logical qubit performance beyond distance 3 for correlated single-qubit Hamiltonian noise models (i.e., global errant qubit rotations), when employing these "lazy" strategies, essentially matches the performance of Pauli noise model with the same process fidelity (fidelity after one application). In a more general circuit model of noise, correlations may add constructively within syndrome extraction rounds but Pauli frame randomization from passive error correction mitigates this effect across multiple rounds.
Related papers
- Fault-tolerant quantum computation with constant overhead for general noise [8.49301882142233]
We show that fault-tolerant quantum computation can be achieved with constant qubit overhead under general noise models.<n>We develop a fault-tolerant error correction scheme and a method for implementing logic gates under general circuit noise.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-12-02T13:41:25Z) - Adaptive Estimation of Drifting Noise in Quantum Error Correction [1.1998722332188005]
We present a framework to capture time-dependent Pauli noise, by exploiting the syndrome statistics of quantum error correction experiments.<n>We prove the noise-filtering behavior of sliding windows, linking window size to spectral cutoff frequencies, and provide an iterative algorithm that captures multiple drift frequencies.<n>Our window-based estimation methods and adaptive decoding offer new insights into noise spectroscopy and decoder optimization under drift.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-11-12T17:03:56Z) - Color code thresholds under circuit-level noise beyond the Pauli framework [0.0]
A quantum error correction code is assessed over its ability to correct errors in noisy quantum circuits.<n>This task requires extensive simulations of faulty quantum circuits, which are often made tractable by considering Pauli noise models.<n>We extend circuit-level noise beyond the Pauli framework by estimating the threshold of the color code under more general noise models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-11-07T21:24:51Z) - Bayesian Quantum Amplitude Estimation [46.03321798937855]
We present BAE, a problem-tailored and noise-aware Bayesian algorithm for quantum amplitude estimation.<n>In a fault tolerant scenario, BAE is capable of saturating the Heisenberg limit; if device noise is present, BAE can dynamically characterize it and self-adapt.<n>We propose a benchmark for amplitude estimation algorithms and use it to test BAE against other approaches.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-12-05T18:09:41Z) - Accelerated zero-order SGD under high-order smoothness and overparameterized regime [79.85163929026146]
We present a novel gradient-free algorithm to solve convex optimization problems.
Such problems are encountered in medicine, physics, and machine learning.
We provide convergence guarantees for the proposed algorithm under both types of noise.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-11-21T10:26:17Z) - Modeling error correction with Lindblad dynamics and approximate channels [0.0]
We study how different approximations of the noise capture the success rate of a code.<n>A Pauli approximation going beyond a single-qubit channel is sensitive to the details of the noise, state, and decoder.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-26T16:48:34Z) - Negative Pre-aware for Noisy Cross-modal Matching [46.5591267410225]
Cross-modal noise-robust learning is a challenging task since noisy correspondence is hard to recognize and rectify.
We present a novel Negative Pre-aware Cross-modal matching solution for large visual-language model fine-tuning on noisy downstream tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-12-10T05:52:36Z) - Accurate and Honest Approximation of Correlated Qubit Noise [39.58317527488534]
We propose an efficient systematic construction of approximate noise channels, where their accuracy can be enhanced by incorporating noise components with higher qubit-qubit correlation degree.<n>We find that, for realistic noise strength typical for fixed-frequency superconducting qubits, correlated noise beyond two-qubit correlation can significantly affect the code simulation accuracy.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-15T19:00:34Z) - Batch Bayesian Optimization for Replicable Experimental Design [56.64902148159355]
Many real-world design problems evaluate multiple experimental conditions in parallel and replicate each condition multiple times due to large and heteroscedastic observation noise.
We propose the Batch Thompson Sampling for Replicable Experimental Design framework, which encompasses three algorithms.
We show the effectiveness of our algorithms in two practical real-world applications: precision agriculture and AutoML.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-02T12:46:03Z) - Scalable noisy quantum circuits for biased-noise qubits [37.69303106863453]
We consider biased-noise qubits affected only by bit-flip errors, which is motivated by existing systems of stabilized cat qubits.
For realistic noise models, phase-flip will not be negligible, but in the Pauli-Twirling approximation, we show that our benchmark could check the correctness of circuits containing up to $106$ gates.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-03T11:27:50Z) - Witnessing entanglement in trapped-ion quantum error correction under
realistic noise [41.94295877935867]
Quantum Error Correction (QEC) exploits redundancy by encoding logical information into multiple physical qubits.
We present a detailed microscopic error model to estimate the average gate infidelity of two-qubit light-shift gates used in trapped-ion platforms.
We then apply this realistic error model to quantify the multipartite entanglement generated by circuits that act as QEC building blocks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-12-14T20:00:36Z) - Leveraging Randomized Compiling for the QITE Algorithm [0.0]
Iterative algorithms like Quantum Imaginary Time Evolution are susceptible to coherent errors.
This article presents the combination of both noise tailoring using Randomized Compiling and error mitigation with a purification.
We show how combining noise tailoring and error mitigation will push forward the performance of NISQ devices.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-04-18T09:26:25Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.