A Systematic Review of Algorithmic Red Teaming Methodologies for Assurance and Security of AI Applications

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.21267v1
• Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2026 11:48:07 GMT
• Title: A Systematic Review of Algorithmic Red Teaming Methodologies for Assurance and Security of AI Applications
• Authors: Shruti Srivastava, Kiranmayee Janardhan, Shaurya Jauhari,
• Abstract summary: This systematic review consolidates existing research on automated red teaming.<n>By synthesizing findings from diverse studies, this review aims to provide a comprehensive understanding of how automation enhances red teaming.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Cybersecurity threats are becoming increasingly sophisticated, making traditional defense mechanisms and manual red teaming approaches insufficient for modern organizations. While red teaming has long been recognized as an effective method to identify vulnerabilities by simulating real-world attacks, its manual execution is resource-intensive, time-consuming, and lacks scalability for frequent assessments. These limitations have driven the evolution toward auto-mated red teaming, which leverages artificial intelligence and automation to deliver efficient and adaptive security evaluations. This systematic review consolidates existing research on automated red teaming, examining its methodologies, tools, benefits, and limitations. The paper also highlights current trends, challenges, and research gaps, offering insights into future directions for improving automated red teaming as a critical component of proactive cybersecurity strategies. By synthesizing findings from diverse studies, this review aims to provide a comprehensive understanding of how automation enhances red teaming and strengthens organizational resilience against evolving cyber threats.

Related papers

• Co-RedTeam: Orchestrated Security Discovery and Exploitation with LLM Agents [57.49020237126194]
  Large language models (LLMs) have shown promise in assisting cybersecurity tasks, yet existing approaches struggle with automatic vulnerability discovery and exploitation.<n>We propose Co-RedTeam, a security-aware multi-agent framework designed to mirror real-world red-teaming.<n>Co-RedTeam decomposes vulnerability analysis into coordinated discovery and exploitation stages, enabling agents to plan, execute, validate, and refine actions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-02T14:38:45Z)
• Techniques of Modern Attacks [51.56484100374058]
  Advanced Persistent Threats (APTs) represent a complex method of attack aimed at specific targets.<n>I will investigate both the attack life cycle and cutting-edge detection and defense strategies proposed in recent academic research.<n>I aim to highlight the strengths and limitations of each approach and propose more adaptive APT mitigation strategies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-19T22:15:25Z)
• Automated Red-Teaming Framework for Large Language Model Security Assessment: A Comprehensive Attack Generation and Detection System [4.864011355064205]
  This paper introduces an automated red-teaming framework that generates, executes, and evaluates adversarial prompts to uncover security vulnerabilities in large language models (LLMs)<n>Our framework integrates meta-prompting-based attack synthesis, multi-modal vulnerability detection, and standardized evaluation protocols spanning six major threat categories.<n> Experiments on the GPT-OSS-20B model reveal 47 distinct vulnerabilities, including 21 high-severity and 12 novel attack patterns.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-21T19:12:44Z)
• Red Teaming AI Red Teaming [11.08584572589146]
  We argue that there exists a significant gap between red teaming's original intent and its narrow focus on discovering model-level flaws in the context of generative AI.<n>We propose a comprehensive framework operationalizing red teaming in AI systems at two levels: macro-level system red teaming and micro-level model red teaming.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-07T23:23:40Z)
• Effective Automation to Support the Human Infrastructure in AI Red Teaming [5.463538170874778]
  We argue for a balanced approach that combines human expertise with automated tools to strengthen AI risk assessment.<n>We highlight key challenges in scaling automated red teaming, including considerations around worker proficiency, agency, and context-awareness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-28T03:36:15Z)
• Attack Atlas: A Practitioner's Perspective on Challenges and Pitfalls in Red Teaming GenAI [52.138044013005]
  generative AI, particularly large language models (LLMs), become increasingly integrated into production applications. New attack surfaces and vulnerabilities emerge and put a focus on adversarial threats in natural language and multi-modal systems. Red-teaming has gained importance in proactively identifying weaknesses in these systems, while blue-teaming works to protect against such adversarial attacks. This work aims to bridge the gap between academic insights and practical security measures for the protection of generative AI systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-23T10:18:10Z)
• Red-Teaming for Generative AI: Silver Bullet or Security Theater? [42.35800543892003]
  We argue that while red-teaming may be a valuable big-tent idea for characterizing GenAI harm mitigations, industry may effectively apply red-teaming and other strategies behind closed doors to safeguard AI. To move toward a more robust toolbox of evaluations for generative AI, we synthesize our recommendations into a question bank meant to guide and scaffold future AI red-teaming practices.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-29T05:46:14Z)
• Scalable and automated Evaluation of Blue Team cyber posture in Cyber Ranges [0.0]
  Cyber ranges have emerged as indispensable environments for conducting secure exercises and simulating real or hypothetical scenarios. One of the main challenges of cyber range scalability is the exercise evaluation that often requires the manual intervention of human operators. This paper proposes a novel approach that uses Blue and Red team reports and well-known databases to automate the evaluation and assessment of the exercise outcomes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-28T18:51:25Z)
• Adversarial Attacks and Defenses in Machine Learning-Powered Networks: A Contemporary Survey [114.17568992164303]
  Adrial attacks and defenses in machine learning and deep neural network have been gaining significant attention. This survey provides a comprehensive overview of the recent advancements in the field of adversarial attack and defense techniques. New avenues of attack are also explored, including search-based, decision-based, drop-based, and physical-world attacks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-11T04:19:31Z)
• Towards Automated Classification of Attackers' TTPs by combining NLP with ML Techniques [77.34726150561087]
  We evaluate and compare different Natural Language Processing (NLP) and machine learning techniques used for security information extraction in research. Based on our investigations we propose a data processing pipeline that automatically classifies unstructured text according to attackers' tactics and techniques.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-18T09:59:21Z)
• Enhanced Adversarial Strategically-Timed Attacks against Deep Reinforcement Learning [91.13113161754022]
  We introduce timing-based adversarial strategies against a DRL-based navigation system by jamming in physical noise patterns on the selected time frames. Our experimental results show that the adversarial timing attacks can lead to a significant performance drop.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-20T21:39:25Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.